Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dtburr@speakeasy.net: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Burr" <dtburr@speakeasy.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:19:21 -0600
I know this seems to be a weird question, but I have the subject amps that I can use with my '7800, and I think one of them needs to go because I can really only use one at a time. There are lots of
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00380.html (7,016 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Burr" <dtburr@speakeasy.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:32:57 -0600
Yeah, I am hoping to have people tell me that because it seems smarter to keep the PW1 and I need to overcome that and keep my real favorite. _______________________________________________ Amps mail
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00392.html (11,067 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Burr" <dtburr@speakeasy.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:06:25 -0600
In any case, FWIW, both these amps have QSK. In addition, it is not what capabilities you have in a piece of equipment, but how you use it, that determines whether you're a LID, so this seems like a
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00401.html (11,079 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Burr" <dtburr@speakeasy.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:31:10 -0600
Dick: Yes, I owned an Emtron DX-2sp and liked it quite a bit. Maybe the thing to do is sell the PW1 and then when it is time to replace the 91B I will look at the DX4, especially because the Alpha pr
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00462.html (12,449 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Burr" <dtburr@speakeasy.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:58:59 -0600
No, I think the guy that designed the Chevy Impala is the one the designed the TS-2000. Or maybe it was the guy that designed the Pontiac Aztek. -- Original Message -- From: Bill Turner To: Dave Burr
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00491.html (9,174 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Burr" <dtburr@speakeasy.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:00:46 -0600
_______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00492.html (10,902 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Test (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Burr" <dtburr@speakeasy.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:06:03 -0600
That's interesting! Thanks for sharing. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00500.html (7,285 bytes)

8. [Amps] 91B and 4CX800Aa (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Burr" <dtburr@speakeasy.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 14:38:10 -0600
Hi Gang. When come out of the Wait state with my 91B, the amp faults and shuts down. I put a new set of tubes in it and it appears to be fine now so I am thinking I have an internal issue (an open or
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00074.html (6,584 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] Drake L-7 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Burr" <dtburr@speakeasy.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 21:33:37 -0600
The odds are *fairly* good, although you should be prepared to by another L-7 with it. L-7s are very highly sought after. You have close to zero chance of someone advertising an L-7 power supply by i
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00219.html (7,311 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] SB-220 Shorted HV Transformer (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Burr" <dtburr@speakeasy.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:20:12 -0600
To each his own, but *I* wouldn't do it even though it is indeed a creative solution. There is nothing in the amp that can't be cleaned using the right cleaner and some care. Drenching it with water
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00392.html (9,565 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu