Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dtx@verizon.net: 58 ]

Total 58 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:36:25 -0500
I'm now using an Omni 6+, serial 08A10477; not fully used to it yet, but it sure acts like what I've come to expect of a Ten-Tec. Will someone tell me what this # means, please. Also, though it has t
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00136.html (7,065 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] OM7 on 40m in Europe (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 08:31:43 -0500
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00001.html (15,732 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Whats a good way to monitor your cw signal? (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:25:41 -0400
In the good old days of separate rx + tx I used a Drake 2b + Viking II for CW (the vast majority of my operating). The 2b was connected to the antenna through a VT T/R switch. It played back what my
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00344.html (11,615 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Remote rig operations (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:28:27 -0400
I guess most if not all of us would rather have the actual rig right in front of us with at least part of the hardware built by our own hands. But each of us has his/her own likes and dislikes and wh
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00723.html (11,376 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Remote rig operations (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:21:45 -0400
Only one big hitch to WB1HGA's idea for running remote for Field Day: the rule that all stations have to be in a 1000 foot circle, which would be fine for one running FD in his own back yard, and ass
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00001.html (9,054 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Remote rig operations (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 15:41:29 -0400
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00005.html (12,328 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] AUX Keying OminiVI Plus (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 00:13:49 -0400
By this extreme definition of no relays, etc. it appears to be impossible for a transceiver to have pure QSK since much circuitry is common to TX and RX. My own experience was with separate TX and RX
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00471.html (12,289 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] CW Tuning with Omni 6 Plus (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 21:57:08 -0400
Like so many other physical phenomena, the effect of zero beating is so difficult to express in words, but with several simple vector diagrams the whole situation becomes obvious. -- Original Message
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00010.html (12,215 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] TenTec's SUmmary of Lightning Strike Damage (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:59:27 -0400
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00283.html (8,877 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Customer Service (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:24:07 -0400
Paul's comment needs expansion: Service up and down the chain is so much more important than first-cost. Correllary: You don't necessarily get what you pay for. K3TX -- Original Message -- From: "Pau
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00285.html (9,512 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Abbreviations (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:42:58 -0500
C, commonly used in traffic nets, = CONFIRM; the opposite being N. C is also used in the same nets as YES. -- Original Message -- From: "Ross F. Guldenbrein" <w6fg@pacbell.net> To: <tentec@contesting
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00066.html (7,799 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Subject: Abbreviations used by amateurs.doc (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:27:54 -0500
To me QSL means either acknowledging receipt of the night's formal traffic, or wants a card. So, if when I'm not on the net and someone says QSL the only possible answer is I answer cards received. -
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00093.html (8,649 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Subject: Abbreviations used by amateurs.doc (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 12:18:03 -0500
What's wrong with just plain "R"? I never have a problem with it though often I send "TU" - both a lot faster than QSL. - - - nothing like back when 10 was first opened to the CB'ers when every other
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00105.html (11,471 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] List Abbreviations (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:10:17 -0500
I've got to remember that long comma bit - though a bit difficult with a keyer -- that old commercial system with the first-second-third phone and first-second-third CW and AT(aircraft telegrapher wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00140.html (13,081 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:54:54 -0500
I guess the new meaning of R is: I hear you. -- Fact of life: the slower the sending the more the repeats. I try to demonstrate practice to the blessed ones trying hard to keep CW active by sending t
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00168.html (8,448 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 21:55:17 -0500
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00188.html (9,171 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Model 705 Microphone (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 23:27:50 -0500
I can fax or mail the full manual for 705 - available by phone or can phone you (costs me zero) if you give me number. With no call shown can't easily look you up. Dave, K3TX (fine QRZ and phone book
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00711.html (8,894 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] New to Ten Tec (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:08:14 -0400
I too tried (owned and used) almost everything else around, though hardly the 45 years you waited. And I never found a transceiver that would come close to equalling the CW performance of my Viking I
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00335.html (9,777 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238A settings? (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:42:54 -0400
The spark plug arrester has the disadvantage of rather blunt points. Much better, as someone mentioned, is a pair of copper (prefereably) or brass plates with facing sharp points, gapped about l/32"
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00268.html (12,799 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238A settings? (score: 1)
Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:46:08 -0400
Agree except the spark plugs don't have the desirable sharp points - the breakdown potential in air from a sharp point is very much lower than from a smooth surface. K4TX -- Original Message -- From:
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00269.html (12,340 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu