Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dx35@hilding.com: 360 ]

Total 360 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Support (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:36:05 -0700
Here's a solution to e-x-p-e-d-i-t-e the issuance of certificates from contest sponsors, in consideration of the following: 1. Most contest ops have a computer and Internet connection. 2. Most logs a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00092.html (10,034 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP in August - stupid idea (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 19:05:34 -0700
A more "stupid idea'" was that I had planned to operate the August NAQP from Alaska. Fortunately, I cancelled my plane reservations on Monday (was supposed to leave for KL7 on Tuesday). Your post con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00130.html (7,423 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Logging Error Reduction Solution (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 19:23:49 -0700
It just came out of the blue today...the solution for a ZERO error rate for all contest log submitters, and it's very simple. If each contest exchange required both parties in the QSO to re-send what
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00131.html (7,693 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:32:34 -0700
(Subject Re-Threaded for brevity) Jim, N3BB, had written: I just remembered that Jim and I talked about this during an eyeball QSO next door to HRO in Sunnyvale (CA) a month or two back, and for most
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00324.html (10,370 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:37:08 -0700
Thank you for your supportive comments, Alex, especially as one who does 48 hours in many contests and wins #1 positions! It is obvious that you understand how such a less-hour duration category (for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00363.html (10,870 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:57:37 -0700
What I am advocating, along with others, is that "former" greyhounds (now on 3 legs), be allowed to still run competitively with the other 3-legged "greyhounds", but in a "3-legged Greyhound Category
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00365.html (8,829 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesters on CW (was: FCC on CW) (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:17:03 -0700
Fun!" What a GREAT idea, Scott Go-For-It, OM !!! I find it most interesting that the "art" of CONTESTING *could* actually be carried on without radios, just as other aspects of amateur radio *can* pr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00411.html (8,307 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting software and RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:38:44 -0700
really missing... for FREE! BEWARE!!! From personal experience circa 7/16/05, the N1MM Installation Procedures are whacked-out vs. reality on an XP machine, and results in unnecessary CONFUSION to th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00412.html (13,576 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:49:33 -0700
You have nicely clarified the precise benefits to all participants that AL, 4L5A/D4B and I mentioned. Thank You. Mr. Wardster, N0AX, commented: Methinks the contest sponsors and admins need to FULLY
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00431.html (10,685 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Thanks CQ-Contest Group Ic-728 (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:38:02 -0700
Congrats, OM. BTW, your "next contest" (opportunity) is sooner than you think...it's this Thursday Night...the NCCC NS :-) See N6ZFO's post with the details. Or, click here: http://www.nccc.cc/pdf/ns
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00458.html (7,266 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Installing N1MM Logger (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:05:53 -0700
The problem is NOT with my new computer. FYI, I just got this direct from yet another contester: Pete, N4ZR, commented: IMHO, most folks simply do not report problems, abandon the attempted install a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00460.html (9,250 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] W1AW/5 (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:37:34 -0700
Gosh, the only ops I heard & worked signing W1AW/5 on several bands were QRQ sharp guys and was curious who *they* were! FYI & 73... Rick, K6VVA _______________________________________________ CQ-Con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00792.html (7,061 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] N3BB & N6RO 2-Way SO2R Video (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:56:04 -0700
Jim, N3BB had written: Little did Jim know at the time both QSOs were being taped (Video & Audio) as a part of the NCCC SO2R Clinic v1.0 :-) I was the "Videographer", et.al. for the event, but won't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00793.html (8,327 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating Methods or Equipment? (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 13:25:07 -0700
Bill, K4XS responded to Bob, KE5CTY's question with some sage advice: experience Great advice from Bill, as well as the various suggestions from Ward/N0AX & Mal/W7MAL. Also see #4 below :-) I'll add:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00840.html (11,098 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating Methods or Equipment? (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 21:04:02 -0700
"Dipole Derby" ... cool idea, except the "Cliff-dweller" up 7,000 on the side of a mountain with equal skills most likely do a LOT better (some directions) than the guy down in the flatlands (or in a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00846.html (9,690 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] Subject: Operating methods or equipment? (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 23:01:24 -0700
Perhaps a good reality check on the "equipment" part here can be found via the pix at: http://www.qsl.net/d44tt/ (D4B) http://www.arraysolutions.com/Users/cn2r.htm http://ru1a.ru/eng/ (check out the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00885.html (7,677 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:32:34 -0700
(Subject Re-Threaded for brevity) Jim, N3BB, had written: I just remembered that Jim and I talked about this during an eyeball QSO next door to HRO in Sunnyvale (CA) a month or two back, and for most
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00913.html (10,370 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:37:08 -0700
Thank you for your supportive comments, Alex, especially as one who does 48 hours in many contests and wins #1 positions! It is obvious that you understand how such a less-hour duration category (for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00952.html (10,870 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:57:37 -0700
What I am advocating, along with others, is that "former" greyhounds (now on 3 legs), be allowed to still run competitively with the other 3-legged "greyhounds", but in a "3-legged Greyhound Category
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00954.html (8,829 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesters on CW (was: FCC on CW) (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:17:03 -0700
Fun!" What a GREAT idea, Scott Go-For-It, OM !!! I find it most interesting that the "art" of CONTESTING *could* actually be carried on without radios, just as other aspects of amateur radio *can* pr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01000.html (8,307 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu