Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dx35@hilding.com: 360 ]

Total 360 documents matching your query.

41. [CQ-Contest] RE: SO2R with KENWOOD Radios +++ (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:35:50 -0800
I plan to do this when the solution is found. Perhaps I should have specified the DXD-Decoder-Dunestar lineup connected to a KENWOOD. In the interim, it seems most ops are using only 2 of the 3 item
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00315.html (9,787 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: SO2R with KENWOOD Radios +++ (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 05:44:02 -0800
Are you saying like an RS-232 cable goes between the Kenwood and the KRC-2, and then another RS-232 cable comes out of the KRC-2 and goes to the computer? If so, I think I will pee my pants here. Tnx
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00321.html (9,849 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: SO2R with KENWOOD Radios +++ (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 05:55:07 -0800
Barry, W2UP wrote: == My setup is not exactly the same (FT1000/FT990, Top Ten Band Decoders and Six Ways, NQN bandpass filters, homebrew SO2R audio switching). However, I have one related suggestion:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00322.html (10,698 bytes)

44. [CQ-Contest] SO2R Of The Future... (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 16:03:36 -0800
(Yet another RE-thread for reasons below). Gosh, guys, once again TNX so much for all of the input which is revealing new considerations toward the future of SO2R when changes need to be made (like a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00335.html (9,388 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: SO2R with KENWOOD Radios +++ (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:50:31 -0800
You are obviously an enterprising experimenter...Congrats, Barry !!! Nice tip...I hope this option may help others here...Tnx. But doesn't the radio's "band data" go from a non-serial port connection
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00352.html (9,804 bytes)

46. [CQ-Contest] RE: The battle of the callsigns (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:39:43 -0800
Jim, N6TJ/ZD8Z added: Jose was kind enough to do an analysis for me: I know you love cut numbers, Jimbo. Alas, I guess a partial relief for me (if it were legal) could be: T T E E E ...or better yet,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00354.html (8,352 bytes)

47. RE: [CQ-Contest] Synthesizer Opinions... (score: 1)
Author: K6VVA <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:32:00 -0800
lifting the microphone. I'm soooooo thrilled you posted this, Gerry, 'cuz this subject turns me on like you wouldn't believe!!! By "voice font" ... something commercially available? Please tell-tell-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00357.html (9,071 bytes)

48. RE: [CQ-Contest] RE: SO2R with KENWOOD Radios +++ (score: 1)
Author: K6VVA <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:36:21 -0800
Pete, N4ZR wrote: == Maybe it is time for the Windows logging software people and the SO2R hardware people to get together and agree on a standard way of performing "traditional" SO2R LPT port functi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00358.html (9,096 bytes)

49. RE: [CQ-Contest] Synthesizer Opinions.... (score: 1)
Author: K6VVA <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:47:48 -0800
Hilarious...absolutely hilarious, Tom. Seriously, for those who may still be pooh-poohing FULL voice automation in contesting, I strongly encourage you to make a paradigm shift real quick...because t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00359.html (8,835 bytes)

50. RE: [CQ-Contest] IC-706 vs. FT-857 (score: 1)
Author: K6VVA <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:03:50 -0800
Kelly, VE4XT: home (or primary if they outperform the 850). the 706 (according to Mr. Heil, anyway), and the Heil the 850. (Too bad the 706 doesn't have the same mic the 706? More than "thoughts", Ke
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00360.html (8,650 bytes)

51. RE: [CQ-Contest] Synthesizer Opinions.... (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:38:13 -0800
Gerry, W1VE posted: == - My "glue" to make this an actual contest keyer was a Visual Basic program. I use Writelog -- with Writelog is very easy to get the callsign entered, as well as the current fr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00377.html (10,577 bytes)

52. RE: [CQ-Contest] Synthesizer Opinions.... (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:57:32 -0800
prohibited in the FCC rules. Ooops...I must have missed something here. "What" is specifically prohibited? Using someone else's voice? We are on the same page in terms of intended use being a "good t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00383.html (9,995 bytes)

53. [CQ-Contest] Voice Automation Enhancements (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 23:13:52 -0800
** RE-Posted from the WriteLog Reflector for the benefit of other Contest Logging Software authors and voice-automation enthusiasts. If you're not in one of these categories, please delete this post.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00399.html (15,261 bytes)

54. [CQ-Contest] RE: Voice Automation Enhancements (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 23:54:30 -0800
voice-keyer right at my fingertips on-the-keyboard... Ooops...some of those 48 buttons are actually for things like: 1. CW Up/Down 2. Rig Swap 3. Wipe QSO 4. ENTER ...and other non-message (voice-key
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00400.html (7,245 bytes)

55. RE: [CQ-Contest] Voice Automation Enhancements and the future (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:44:11 -0800
I am only one of several folks whacking away at chunks of the "opportunity" pie :-) a CW contest? Not entirely, IMHO. Phone rates per hour are much higher than CW rates, and it will take a number of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00406.html (10,023 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] Voice Automation Enhancements and the future (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 19:53:07 -0800
copy with no problems--stations Umh, here's a novel thought: all of the "real heavy accent" stations use ENGLISH voice-fonts :-) :-) :-) Nostalgic Trivia: I doubt most folks know that Jim, N6TJ/ZD8Z,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00413.html (8,215 bytes)

57. [CQ-Contest] RE: DX QTH Rental Wanted? (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 12:13:51 -0800
I think it was this forum but can't find the post...someone was recently looking for a DX QTH Rental or place to go this month. Due to bizz responsibilities here, I've just had to cancel my planned t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00038.html (7,124 bytes)

58. RE: [CQ-Contest] RTTY and CW Sprints (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:42:28 -0800
Joe, K4IK wrote: == No, it is the sponsors of a NORTH AMERICAN contest who chose to move it into conflict with an INTERNATIONAL RTTY contest. The solution is to return CW Sprint to the first weekend
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00144.html (9,129 bytes)

59. [CQ-Contest] RE: Sprint Alternatives (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:14:55 -0800
Paul, K5AF suggested: on the time of year, Ooops...with regard to 10m, did you mean to say "depending on where we are in the Sunspot Cycle" ? :-) I like the idea of MORE Sprints ... more options to j
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00188.html (7,683 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best HF rig under $900 (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:23:46 -0800
If you want strictly "Used" with no 6m, I bought my TS-870S rigs each for about $900 via Ebay. IMHO, check for loose change in the couch, etc. and come up with about $30+ more and buy yourself a **NE
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00257.html (9,397 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu