Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:55:52 -0500
In addition, the Paragon II has a better computer controlled command set, FM standard, and fewer birdies. I am glad I made the additional investment. I really like mine. Ed, N5EI ____________________
Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 13:51:55 -0400
I have one that I am using and the manual. What would you like to know specifically? Ed, N5EI _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.c
Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 12:12:58 -0400
Perhaps they are planning to add it. Ed, N5EI Subject: [TenTec] Sherwood presentation at Dayton From: "Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales" <sales@tentec.com> Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 10:32:17 -0400 To: t
Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 17:33:24 -0400
I'd like to see a box that has the dsp IF of the Orion that I could attach to my Paragon II, but also the Omni, ... While the front end would not be as good, and there would not be improvement on SSB
Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:28:42 -0400
Subject: [TenTec] The "What is SDR?" question From: "Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales" <sales@tentec.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:40:54 -0400 To: tentec@contesting.com To: tentec@contesting.com Bac
Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 08:09:20 -0400
The key to the use of the differential tuner is a differential capacitor. Visualize a T with inductor to ground and the stator of the differential capacitor. Remember that in a differental capacitor,
Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 14:42:55 -0400
I am trying to use the II's computer interface. I am having difficulty with the responses to queried data, but not to receiving CDE (Matrix) data. TRX-Manager indicates communication error using IC73
Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:39:22 -0400
Thanks to all for your helpful suggestions. My manual for the Paragon II was dated 10/93. It said that the II emulated the IC-735. This is FALSE. VE1BN's manual dated 5/94 said that the II emulated t
Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 10:12:56 -0400
It does not seem to be there this morning. Ed, N5EI -- Subject: Re: [TenTec] Weak Signal DX'ing From: "Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales" <sales@tentec.com> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 08:24:38 -0400 To: t
Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 11:43:10 -0400
Several list members assisted me in determining that my problem was in using Mozilla 1.71. When I tried using Internet Explorer, I got it first thing! Ed Feustel _____________________________________
Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 05:39:29 -0400
The only disadvantage I can think of is in long wave reception where a resistive PAD decreases the sensitivity of the receiver. You would probably need a LW antenna matcher for really good reception.
Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:44:34 -0400
John, I have finally gotten my Paragon II to talk to my computer. The key is that it uses an Icom-765 interface (or an Omni 6 (not the +)) interface. TRX-Manager works with it as does XMLog. You must
Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:32:57 -0400
Paul wrote: -- Subject: [TenTec] How? Paragon II software control From: designer <designer@quickdata.com> Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 18:18:07 -0700 To: tentec@contesting.com If anyone has be successful w
Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:22:48 -0500
Jerry, Do you have the Paragon I or II? I am wondering how the II sensitivity might compare to the other rigs you mention. I have a TS 930S and like its CW Roofing and CW filters. I do prefer the Par
Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:09:36 -0500
Kurt, I have a Paragon II. I like it very much, especially its ability to do 60 meters. It has a number of upgrades from the Paragon I. If you have your choice and want to control by computer, use FM
Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 05:24:28 -0500
t Subject: RE: [TenTec] Paragon question From: "Scott Prather" <sdprat@worldnet.att.net> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:45:59 -0800 To: <tentec@contesting.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Paul-This problem
Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 15:12:22 -0500
Paul, I killed my diodes by using another transmitter with an antenna switch to select between the two. A little to much RF will take them out every time. Or a nearby lightning miss will do it as wel
Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 06:12:40 -0400
On 12 meters into a dummy load with a Paragon II, with "NO" swr, at about 15 watts output and 3 amps IC the 962 shuts down after a few seconds of key down. On 10 meters into the dummy load, there is
Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:01:26 -0400
On the Paragon II, 40M and 30M both pass through the same lowpass filter on transmit. On all bands except these two, the swr into my Heathkit cantenna is below 1.05 to 1. On these two bands, there is
Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:25:01 -0400
Is your internal FM Board broken? FM is "standard" with the Paragon II. Ed, N5EI _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com