Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ehertz@tcaf.org: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] newbie question on inverted-L's, tuners, and radials (score: 1)
Author: "Eugene Hertz" <ehertz@tcaf.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 18:40:40 +0000
Hello all, I have spent the better part of the day reading through the posts on this list covering topics of radials and inverted-Ls (nearly 3,000 posts!). Great wealth of information. I have, I beli
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00475.html (10,411 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] one last question (score: 1)
Author: "Eugene Hertz" <ehertz@tcaf.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 20:23:02 +0000
sorry, meant to add this into my first post. I am looking to buy antenna wire. I am trying to decide between copperweld or this stuff called "flex-weave". Has anyone had experience with both to formu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00480.html (7,206 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Thanks - and follow up Q's. (score: 1)
Author: "Eugene Hertz" <ehertz@tcaf.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:15:13 +0000
Super thanks to everyone who responded to my questions. Not only did I learn all about the pros and cons of antenna wire, not only did I get some fill-in-the-gap knowledge about radials, but as an ad
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00531.html (11,903 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] different OCF dipoles? (score: 1)
Author: "Eugene Hertz" <ehertz@tcaf.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 04:20:51 +0000
Hello all, I am thinking of abandoning an original idea for a fan inverted-L and instead going for a windom/ocfd. I saw a few mfg of these for up to 80m and while they both had very similar total len
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00017.html (7,177 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] OCF and 160m? (score: 1)
Author: "Eugene Hertz" <ehertz@tcaf.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:23:33 +0000
Hello all, ok: I got a real bender for you experts and modelers out there (I am neither!). I have two trees on my property. They are 195' apart. I am thinking of an OCF dipole with 45' and 90' legs w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00076.html (8,238 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] OCF and 160m (score: 1)
Author: "Eugene Hertz" <ehertz@tcaf.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:53:08 +0000
Hi again all, Just a big thank you to everyone who responded about my truly hare-brained scheme! The good news is, N2EA gave me the great idea to get a 160m ocf (252+ feet) and let one end hang down
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00242.html (6,531 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] OCF 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Eugene Hertz" <ehertz@tcaf.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 12:35:49 +0000
Hi Jim, do you think #12 flexweave is preferred over, say, #12 copper clad steel 7-strand (uninsulated) or #13 "vari-flex" 19-strand copper-clad insulated? radioworks sells the windoms made from that
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00250.html (8,130 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Stringing dipoles? (score: 1)
Author: "Eugene Hertz" <ehertz@tcaf.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:15:41 +0000
Ok, this may be the simplest question I will ever ask here so here goes. During my research for OCF dipoles, I have read about some horror stories of dipoles breaking or coming apart due to the stres
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00323.html (8,913 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu