Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:elwell@salisbury.net: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Lazy U Antenna (score: 1)
Author: elwell@salisbury.net (Henry G. Elwell, Jr.)
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 21:07:09 -0500
Now that the flurry of Inverted U antennas is over, let me comment on the Lazy U for those that want a simple, effective antenna for 160m without the fuss of radials. This antenna was originally deve
/archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00063.html (8,815 bytes)

2. Topband: Lazy U (score: 1)
Author: elwell@salisbury.net (Henry G. Elwell, Jr.)
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 20:46:01 -0500
Hi Denny, I'm grateful for your reply, and your interest in modeling the Lazy U. My model on EZNEC shows it to have a gain of 2.77 dbi with an input impedance of 43 - j42000. By removing the lower 90
/archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00086.html (7,028 bytes)

3. Topband: Folded wire verticals (score: 1)
Author: elwell@salisbury.net (Henry G. Elwell, Jr.)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:15:58 -0500
Although these are antenna statements, they are pertinent to 160m verticals FACTS: 1. Radiation efficiency of an antenna is determined by; Radiation resistance Eff.=-- Rad. resist.+Ground resist.+Tun
/archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00166.html (8,081 bytes)

4. Topband: Folded dipole (score: 1)
Author: elwell@salisbury.net (Henry G. Elwell, Jr.)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:15:58 -0500
I love Ham Radio and the Hams in it. What could have been received as a frivolous question, is input resistance the same as radiation resistance, was answered by Hams from Italy, Germany, and across
/archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00180.html (9,509 bytes)

5. Topband: Top loading (score: 1)
Author: elwell@salisbury.net (Henry G. Elwell, Jr.)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:57:08 -0500
In September 1971 when I was W2MB, Ham Radio published an article by me on a top loaded vertical for 80 meters: it applies to 160 meters. The antenna was 1/4 wave in length, with a six foot diameter,
/archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00193.html (8,461 bytes)

6. Topband: Top Loading (score: 1)
Author: elwell@salisbury.net (Henry G. Elwell, Jr.)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 16:21:23 -0500
This topic had less interest to the group, or less people are knowledgeable about the subject; I received three answers and one request for a summary of the answers from AA6WG. Questions 1.: Does a t
/archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00207.html (10,214 bytes)

7. Topband: Reminiscing (score: 1)
Author: "Henry G. Elwell, Jr." <elwell@salisbury.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:35:45 -0500
Hi Gang, Nobody has mentioned it, but there was a 160m band back in the '30s, but was not DX oriented, or there were no or few DX stations on. As an 18 year old kid on AM in '38 with 100w and a Zepp
/archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00208.html (7,237 bytes)

8. Topband: Cattle and Beverages (score: 1)
Author: "Henry G. Elwell, Jr." <elwell@salisbury.net>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 21:26:44 -0400
There is a physical problem with cows in a field with transmission lines/beverages high enough to be over the cows. Cows take great delight in rubbing their necks against support structures, and even
/archives//html/Topband/2005-05/msg00003.html (7,528 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu