Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ersmar@comcast.net: 445 ]

Total 445 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [TowerTalk] insulators "Applications" (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 23:14:31 -0400
TT: The insulators shown are for high-voltage insulator strings used in the electric utility industry. The ball at the bottom of one insulator slips into the clevis joint at the top of the next one i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00698.html (14,735 bytes)

182. Re: [TowerTalk] Does a Shunt Fed tower Care...? (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 15:22:47 +0000
Pat: For my shunt-feed system, I use a hybrid of the two techniques (individual attachment points plus with a wire buss surrounding the tower base). I connect several radial wires to each #2 ground w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00707.html (10,675 bytes)

183. Re: [TowerTalk] Securing the cables to the tower? (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 23:57:33 +0000
Alan: I have a Trylon tower with angular steel legs like the AN Wireless tower. I ran the cables in the same place you are contemplating - inside the leg angle. To fasten the cables to the steel, I u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00039.html (9,533 bytes)

184. Re: [TowerTalk] installing monster masts in towers (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 19:33:45 +0000
JC: You've got it: Build the Trylon or ANW tower AROUND the CM mast. Seriously. It's what I did, although a bit belatedly. (See below.) After you have the first/bottom section built and concreted int
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00192.html (11,114 bytes)

185. Re: [TowerTalk] installing monster masts in towers (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 20:44:01 +0000
JC et al: Sorry. Only the KNOT should fit into the bottom of the CM mast. The shackle should be large enough to keep the knot from sliding farther inside the mast, but small enough to fit through the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00194.html (12,954 bytes)

186. Re: [TowerTalk] installing monster masts in towers (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 20:34:19 -0400
Dave: You're correct - to a point. The knot/shackle at the bottom of the CM (or any other) mast does not have to thread through either/any bearings. Once past the rotator plate level, the mast is as
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00207.html (19,527 bytes)

187. Re: [TowerTalk] installing monster masts in towers (and ? twothrustbearings?) (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 00:15:37 -0400
JC: You'll have your hands full trying to get two bearing blocks AND a rotator AND the attaching shelves all lined up on the tower. Leave out the second (middle) bearing assembly and make your life a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00215.html (15,808 bytes)

188. Re: [TowerTalk] installing monster masts in towers (and? twothrustbearings?) (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 15:46:06 +0000
TT: First of all, the industrial bearings some of us use atop our towers are intended for mounting with the mast horizontal, such as in manufacturing environments. In those instances, the bearings al
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00222.html (13,797 bytes)

189. Re: [TowerTalk] installing monster masts in towers (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 12:29:07 -0400
Peter: ... and a realtively calm day is needed. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F that elsewhere. I had a they on a T2X. Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and as
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00226.html (10,171 bytes)

190. Re: [TowerTalk] installing monster masts in towers (and ? twothrustbearings) (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:44:46 +0000
Steve: This is a posting I made some time ago on the subject: http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00163.html . When I made my posting from a few days ago I had this in min
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00251.html (10,362 bytes)

191. Re: [TowerTalk] installing monster masts in towers (and ? twothrustbearings) (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:54:21 +0000
(Second time sending this note; first one bounced due to quote marks maybe?) Steve: This is a posting I made some time ago on the subject: http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00256.html (10,518 bytes)

192. Re: [TowerTalk] Getting ground rods OUT (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:38:23 -0400
Jim: I removed a ground rod by bolting a ground clamp near the top and wrapping a chain of some heft around it. Then I used a ratchet bumper jack (not a scissors jack) to pull on the chain. As I reca
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00304.html (9,565 bytes)

193. Re: [TowerTalk] Pad and Pier Foundations (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:09:45 +0000
Kelly: Digging this kind of excavation is a royal PITA. First, you dig the hole the size of the bottom pad, e.g., 5X5 feet, to the final depth of the hole. You place rebar for the pad AND for the pie
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00076.html (12,035 bytes)

194. Re: [TowerTalk] Pad and Pier Foundations (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:43:11 -0400
JC: I believe there is a liquid product that is applied to the first-poured concrete that will enhance adhesion to the later pours. I can't recall it's name; maybe someone else on the reflector knows
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00084.html (12,441 bytes)

195. Re: [TowerTalk] Obstruction Lighting (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 00:32:34 -0400
cut the Doug: When you mount a vertical antenna in the inverted position as you are contemplating, you need to allow for drainage of any accumulated water from within the radome. (There is probably a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00111.html (9,555 bytes)

196. Re: [TowerTalk] Rigging Dipoles and Growing Old (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 19:11:15 +0000
Lee: You ought to support the center coax in dipoles mainly to prevent the coax from tearing (bare coax wired to radiating elements) or to keep the PL-259 connector from pulling loose (your case with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00147.html (11,911 bytes)

197. Re: [TowerTalk] Pad and Pier Foundations (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:34:15 +0000
Kelly: There is a trick to getting the equivalent of undistrubed earth performance from earth that's been disturbed. This is done all the time in the professional (tower) construction industry. (BTW
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00270.html (11,847 bytes)

198. Re: [TowerTalk] concrete weight (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 06:05:12 +0000
Terry: Concrete weighs about 4000 pounds per cuyd. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00305.html (7,665 bytes)

199. Re: [TowerTalk] Simple Tower Construction (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 19:08:02 +0000
Scott: I would not recommend a tilt-over tower on the roof of your house. The average residential, framed roof system is not designed to withstand the forces generated by wind loading on a tower or f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00395.html (10,253 bytes)

200. Re: [TowerTalk] Cage vertical (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 23:07:32 +0000
Tom: If you attempt to use aluminum, you have the issue of mechanically connecting the metallic spreaders to the copper wire. Then you have the issue of sealing this connection to prevent Galvanic co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00404.html (8,360 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu