- 1. Topband: 160m L impedance?? (score: 1)
- Author: "John" <fraz1@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:39:36 -0600
- OK Gurus...... Quarter-wave L, vertical to 66 feet, balance horizontal. 32 radials on the ground, length ranging from 35 to 68 feet with a good mix of those lengths. Using 14 solid copper, insulated
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-12/msg00092.html (6,965 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: Gold Plated AC Outlets Accelerate W3UR's Quest for TBDXCC-300 (score: 1)
- Author: "John Frazier" <fraz1@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 07:13:15 -0600
- Bernie..... I see that they are claiming 3-4 DB gain. Is that with or without gold outlet covers, please? 73 John W4II -- Original Message -- From: "Bernie McClenny, W3UR" <bernie@dailydx.com> To: <d
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00030.html (10,178 bytes)
- 3. Topband: UA0CA....Zone? (score: 1)
- Author: "John Frazier" <fraz1@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:04:59 -0600
- Good conditions in AL this morning, bagging TX3A and this guy. Anyone know what zone he is in, please? It appears he has a stateside manager, but KX7Z doesn't list an email on QRZ.com. 73 John W4II _
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00198.html (6,697 bytes)
- 4. Topband: UA0CA is in Zone 19 (score: 1)
- Author: "John Frazier" <fraz1@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:20:14 -0600
- Andy, RF4ZA, responded that UA0CA is in Zone 19. Thanks, Andy. John W4II _______________________________________________ 160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00199.html (6,558 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: Is this considerd assisted (score: 1)
- Author: "John" <fraz1@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:45:14 -0600
- The ultimate decision could be a little hairy. 73 W4II John -- Original Message -- From: "David Hollander" <n7rk@cox.net> To: "Howard K2HK" <k2hk@arrl.net> Cc: "topband" <topband@contesting.com> Sent
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00251.html (8,364 bytes)
- 6. Topband: Laziness and Stupidity...and listing of callsigns! (score: 1)
- Author: "John" <fraz1@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:52:51 -0600
- Hello Mr. Jim.... Perhaps you should review the RED BOLD letters under the reflector rules. We all make mistakes or use less than our best judgment from time to time. We're all in this together. 73 J
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00274.html (6,499 bytes)
- 7. Re: Topband: W0ZF_QSL (score: 1)
- Author: "John" <fraz1@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 15:04:55 -0600
- Hi Victor..... Your server keeps bouncing my notes to you. I sent W0ZF an email about your QSO. We'll see if he responds. The database shows his call was to expire, so something may have happened? --
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00048.html (7,692 bytes)
- 8. Topband: EWE experts.....or non too... (score: 1)
- Author: "John Frazier" <fraz1@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:59:26 -0600
- Hi Folks.... Using a freshly erected EWE (easterly direction from AL) optimized for 80m. It is 10' high, 35' long, and fed with nice 9:1 transformer, terminated in 900 ohms, and uses 4' copper ground
- /archives//html/Topband/2010-01/msg00062.html (7,095 bytes)
- 9. Re: Topband: re topband QRP (score: 1)
- Author: John Frazier <fraz1@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 21:32:44 -0600
- Tom, not exactly certain of your meaning of legal. But, 97.199 4(C) Station Identification does allow for the addition of an "indicator" to your FCC assigned call sign. (c) One or more indicators may
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00385.html (9,065 bytes)
- 10. Re: Topband: Fwd: Strange propagation (score: 1)
- Author: "John" <fraz1@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:09:48 -0600
- We are all entitled to our opinions and, of course, they may differ from others. I'm fine with thoughtful discussion. I think it's healthy. I do, however, tire of always having the technology bit thr
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00253.html (7,482 bytes)
- 11. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
- Author: John Frazier <fraz1@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:22:53 -0600
- Well......many of us /have/ worked to change the rules to reflect the use of remote operations. In FACT, the ARRL DX Advisory Committee recommended to the ARRL BOD that a distance limit be included i
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00360.html (9,396 bytes)
- 12. Re: Topband: FCC regulations circa 1960's (score: 1)
- Author: John Frazier <fraz1@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 10:16:41 -0600
- Tom.... I /think/ I understand your point and question. If I recall, didn't we have to send our call as a / (stroke) suffix after the lower class call? That's what I recall anyway. Anyone else with b
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00418.html (8,842 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu