Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:frenaye@direcway.com: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] comments from non-submitters? (score: 1)
Author: frenaye@direcway.com (Tom Frenaye)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:41 2003
Sounds like it might be useful information to have. Rather than making it into a research project that no one has the time to do, a simpler (do-it-now) solution might for each person on the reflector
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01608.html (11,538 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] Full Circle -- Why we operate (score: 1)
Author: frenaye@direcway.com (Tom Frenaye)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:41 2003
Starting this year digital modes will be permitted. Not without controversy though! -- Tom == e-mail: k1ki@arrl.org ARRL New England Division Director http://www.arrl.org/ Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01610.html (7,739 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] comments from non-submitters? (score: 1)
Author: frenaye@direcway.com (Tom Frenaye)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:41 2003
The ARRL does accept paper logs, but sure prefers and appreciates them electronically. As someone else said, the recent NCJ Sprint contest had a web-based input form that seemed to work well. I'm hop
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01619.html (9,813 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] Re: CONTEST RULES CHANGE - ARRL CONTESTS (score: 1)
Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:38:05 -0400
The only real change to off times in ARRL contests is that the 10m contest now requires a minimum of 30 minutes for off times - it didn't used to be specified and some people took advantage of it to
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-09/msg00064.html (9,150 bytes)

5. [VHFcontesting] ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: input invited (score: 1)
Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:16:28 -0500
To VHF+ contesters: For the last year or so the ARRL has been studying ways to increase interest and participation in VHF+ contests (and awards). It was a good sign that participation was up in last
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00038.html (18,678 bytes)

6. RE: [VHFcontesting] The eXhibition-Games = Combining UHF+uWae (score: 1)
Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 22:25:51 -0500
The first one was in 1978. It slowly grew to 249 logs in 1994, then dropped to 164 by 1998. Another effort to promote it in 1999 brought it back to 250 logs. The number of entries have dropped since
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-03/msg00068.html (8,610 bytes)

7. [VHFcontesting] ARRL technical awards (score: 1)
Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:23:25 -0500
Nomination deadline for ARRL technical awards is March 31! (Mar 22, 2004) -- Nominations for ARRL technical awards recognizing service, innovation and microwave development in the technical arena ar
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-03/msg00088.html (8,214 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] VHF/UHF subcommittee report (score: 1)
Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:42:28 -0400
The work done by the VHF-UHF Contests/Awards Subcommittee has been completed. The written report and along with some some in-person additional comments were given during the ARRL Board's Program & Se
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-07/msg00080.html (29,415 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] How to build the June VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 00:04:08 -0400
Detailed score listings were taken out of QST contest results starting with January 2003 QST. That coincided with the results of the June 2002 June VHF QSO Party. I don't believe any significant chan
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-07/msg00108.html (8,519 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] Too Many Contests? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:58:40 -0400
620 is not the final number. Paper logs are not included yet, for example. 725 is a good estimate to use. 771 average They are pretty close. Compared to 1996 the number of logs in June has dropped by
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-07/msg00134.html (9,302 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] Java Logbook? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 15:08:51 -0400
http://www.qsl.net/w1jq/ -- Tom -- e-mail: frenaye@pcnet.com YCCC --> http://www.yccc.org/ Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box J, West Suffield CT 06093 Phone: 860-668-5444 ___________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00007.html (7,229 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] Pack Rovers meet ARRL contest objectives (score: 1)
Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:37:23 -0400
Actually, maybe you've quite clearly pointed out one of the major differences between VHF/UHF/rover contesting and HF contesting. I've never been a serious contender in a VHF+ contest so I've never a
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00209.html (10,254 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu