Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:g.m.mcadams@comcast.net: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX question (score: 1)
Author: "Gary McAdams" <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 07:44:46 -0800
Klaus: with I believe that this means that when your log is scored, it will only be compared to others in the same category. You will still be able to call/work any station in the test, the differenc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00491.html (8,208 bytes)

2. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Gary McAdams" <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:08:28 -0800
Hello Guys... I have been following this debate, and I wanted to ask Mal a question: Mal, N7MAL SEZ: Mal, Are you saying that FCC has rules pertaining to contests? Yes, there are FCC regulations pert
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00668.html (10,044 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] HELP-Accused of Cheating (score: 1)
Author: g.m.mcadams@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 01:04:06 +0000
Bill, You bet! Ignore it. This is nothing more than an extreme case of sour grapes. Although the accuser shows a little more courage than most of the snipers. You know how you competed; the other sta
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00043.html (8,975 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW Participation (score: 1)
Author: g.m.mcadams@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 02:22:48 +0000
Pat, Speaking as a middle-to-end of the pack contestor, I sometimes upload to LOTW BEFORE I send the Cabrillo file to the contest sponsor. I have found that the contest community as a whole is very g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00175.html (9,960 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Toughest SS CW sections 2006 (score: 1)
Author: g.m.mcadams@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 02:28:41 +0000
Mike, I did not get the clean sweep this year.... Darnit! Toughest one(s) for me: EWA believe it or not! Finally got WA7LT on 80. MT; did not ever hear Montana this year. NT; could not copy VY1JA und
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00177.html (9,030 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Changing categories (score: 1)
Author: g.m.mcadams@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:45:44 +0000
Rick, Speaking as a casual contestor who has only been in the running, never at the top, your idea is not practical. Or are you saying that only participants who "expect to win" should register? Eith
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00305.html (8,974 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesters and LOTW (score: 1)
Author: "Gary McAdams" <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:27:57 -0700
Original message edited for brevity... Not content. SNIP SNIP Shelby, While you apparently consider yourself a mid-level, not overly-active contester, I would think that you are on a much higher leve
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00093.html (10,591 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] RE;, RE, RE Skimmer.. Give it a rest already! (score: 1)
Author: g.m.mcadams@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 01:15:05 +0000
Guys, As a middle or bottom of the pack, low life contester type, I can only ask that all you highly motivated contest experts take the skimmer debate to E-mail! I can't believe the amount of time an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00133.html (7,338 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Triple Play Award (score: 1)
Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:45:12 -0700
Yeah, Me too.. I already have fifty on phone, fifty on RTTY and forty-seven on CW. All via LOTW. Getting those last few confirmations on CW will not be a real problem, I'll just do NAQP or Sweeps. It
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00209.html (8,668 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] ETHICS (score: 1)
Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:41:05 -0700
Glen, 14.196 is not out of US allocations. 14.147 maybe but not .196 Unless the caller is not an Extra or Advanced. Yeah I know, our band slices for various licensees are very confusing, even to us,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00021.html (10,046 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] ETHICS (score: 1)
Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 07:33:43 -0700
Fellows, This stuff really gets out of hand doesn't it? I don't understand where the "ethics" part comes from, especially if we ware talking about the "called" station. How anyone in the excitement o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-04/msg00091.html (9,885 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Something we need to remember (score: 1)
Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:53:45 -0700
Randy, (and the others) Now you have opened the floodgates. After every major contest, we, the contest community and the ham community at large, are subjected to these same complaints. This subject h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00312.html (9,319 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public logs, public perception (score: 1)
Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 06:35:05 -0700
OK Guys, Speaking only as one of the bottom feeder type of con-tester, you know; one of those folks that all you top-tier types need to fill in your precious logs... It is a matter of little to no co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00232.html (9,966 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:04:41 -0800
This fellow did the same to his call that he was doing to the DX calls. Check VE7FKM. I think that will answer your questions 73 Gary _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00314.html (8,130 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Unending arguments... (score: 1)
Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:45:48 -0700
Guys, I have been a subscriber to the list for quite some time. I have also read most, if not all, of the hot button debates that come up from time to time. Sometimes, I even learn something from the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-08/msg00083.html (7,621 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSO Party Rules (score: 1)
Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 05:31:58 -0700
Having worked every state in the union more than once, I usually only participate in state QSO parties for fun. But since I live in Washington state, a number of our local clubs are fairly competitiv
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-09/msg00029.html (10,524 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu