I have been looking at some old CQWW CW logs for hints and tips, to discover how some of the top guns operate. In some of them I came across apparantly glaring anomolies which did not accord with my
Thanks Doug and others. I did not say that this was illegal, perhaps my post implied it as I had a couple of offlist mails which assured me that there would be only one transmitted signal at any giv
Could anyone provide a link to SRR pages for previous results for above contest, preferably english language pages. Thanks in advance. Brian 5B4AIZ. _______________________________________________ CQ
I am only a 50 minute flight away from OD5 and for some time have been attempting to discover how to obtain a licence. They do not have a CEPT agreement in place. I want to know the possibility of ob
Looking for help from any Russian speakers who entered this one. The results just issued suggest there are some serious issues with the checking software. My UBN which was made available looks a joke
We are now only about 3 weekends away from the SSB contest and yet last years results have not appeared online. Publication in CQ mag was some 3 months ago so why have they not yet appeared on the we
There sould not be any shades of gray. Single operator says what it means. Once that contest clock starts to tick then you should be on your own. The following rules taken from the WRTC website for
Absolutely Dave. The message that guys have to take on board is that if they do not log dupes, or refuse to work what they think will be a dupe, they could and will lose the points for what they thin
I am open to the idea of creating a limited time category. However, I dont want to give people a reason not to be on the air and making contacts! What do you think is the best solution? (K5ZD). Your
When I lived in Falmouth Cornwall UK more than 20 years ago I helped out from time to time on the maritime mobile net which was run by a another Falmouth ham, Rudi G4FTO. IIRC it was either this same
And just how do you do that peter? It depends what floats you boat. Personlly I have little interest in a contest which penalises you for the other uys mistake. Moreover, as a semi rare dx stn, I
Igor. So an artificial log can be created and those points can be allowed. I don't feel that I am 'nit picking' if I ask how do they know that the operator of that non combatant station copied m
Bravo Jim - I doubt that anything can be added to that. Problem is that the technology ops just can't see it as a different world. Shame tho' to see the loss of interest from lot's of the top guy
Having followed this debate I do feel that Prasad does make a very good suggestion with regard to the award of two points per inter-asian contacts, same would stand for inter oceana too.. It seems to
I dust off the mic just a couple of times per year for the two 'big ones'. I began about 6.00am Saturday and around five or six hours into the event began to wonder 'What the heck am I doing here?'
. I wonder if someone until today has checked if the participants were members of a specific club or were inside the distance's limitation... 73 Kostas sv1dpi Obviously not Kostas, Certainly in EU th
What this debate highlights is the anomoly of creating only one listing for the QRP section, whereas every other section is divided, NA & Rest of the World. Because of the different scoring systems
Absoulutely no doubt about it. Jamie should publish a retraction by way of an apology to the LZ9W group - that's the way things should be done. 73 Brian C4Z. From: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel
Very interesting to see that not only are these logs are open to public view but also the ubn reports. I don't know if permission is a pre-requisite of entry but can imagine the storm if CQ or AR
Sure you are ok Hank. In the other guys log there is no 'dupe'and he will get a bust for the first contact with the bad call. Your second contact is marked as a 'dupe' in your scored log with no pena