- 1. Re: [TowerTalk] Prosistel PST61 Control Box problem (score: 1)
- Author: "gd0tep" <gd0tep@manx.net>
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 15:56:20 -0500
- I'd change the pot in the bottom of the rotator itself.. Prosistel aren't as big as you think.. http://gd0tep.com/pst61/PST61.htm 73 Andy http://gd0tep.com Hi guys, I am rebuilding the station and as
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00198.html (8,626 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Prosistel PST61 Control Box problem (score: 1)
- Author: "gd0tep" <gd0tep@manx.net>
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 18:34:40 -0500
- The idea of the Prosistel is a good one, its just built to a price, and in some places it shows. The PST61 of mine that failed, was due the FOUR tiny metal machine screws that hold the rotator onto
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00204.html (8,773 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] PST61 Rotor Reliability? (score: 1)
- Author: "Andy GD0TEP" <gd0tep@manx.net>
- Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 06:37:50 -0500
- I have a PST61 turning a 6M11JKV (69ft boom) I say I have a '61, but what version? My impression on Prosistel is that designs changed along the way, but model numbers remained. I contacted the compan
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-12/msg00097.html (8,813 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Prosistel 61D (score: 1)
- Author: <gd0tep@manx.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 06:32:36 -0500
- The problem with Prosistel in Italy is that they have so many variants of the same model, BUT without identifying each as different. I have two PST61 rotators, the first was green and has a 48v AC mo
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00175.html (10,147 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Prosistel 61D (score: 1)
- Author: <gd0tep@manx.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 17:27:37 -0500
- Bizarrely, I initially thought I'd bought a PST51 (the 48v one) and later on bought a PST61. It wasn't until I saw the web site of K8RI I realised that it was a 61. My newer 61 (12v) was bought some
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00179.html (12,951 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu