Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:gerry@w1ve.com: 66 ]

Total 66 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] PDA logging (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 09:22:30 -0400
There is a program called PocketDOS for the pocketPC... This is available from http://www.pocketdos.com I have ran the old "freeware" version of CT on my Toshiba PocketPC using PocketDOS. (The later
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00714.html (8,197 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] license class and m-m op's (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 10:10:13 -0400
The FCC is VERY clear about third party rules and contesting. I'm sure this FCC Enforcement Letter was what started this thread. outside his privledges, even with a higher-license-class control Opera
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00123.html (11,167 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] license class and m-m op's (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 12:50:18 -0400
Holy Cow, you only read what you want to read: Again, from the FCC Enforcement letter: "You could have also participated under the direction of a control operator, but you would have been limited to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00125.html (13,966 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] What to log? (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 10:08:35 -0400
Hi Brett, Well, actually, it's perfectly valid to sign, for example, VE1/W1VE or W1VE/VE1 (Not for me, since I hold a Canadian license also.) The W1VE/VE1 is the generally accepted method and arrange
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00299.html (11,383 bytes)

5. RE: [CQ-Contest] Synthesizer Opinions.... (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:24:27 -0500
Hi Eric, See my comments below: Gerry, W1VE posted: == - My "glue" to make this an actual contest keyer was a Visual Basic program. I use Writelog -- with Writelog is very easy to get the callsign en
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00381.html (12,267 bytes)

6. RE: [CQ-Contest] More on using TRlog on a WinXP machine with athumbUSB drive (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:33:41 -0500
Cool Solution. Another is running Microsoft Virtual PC... $100 or so from many spots on the web. Virual PC allowws you to run any X86 compatible OS in a window or XP, Win2K etc. I've built Virtual PC
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00048.html (12,798 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] WSJ Article: In the interest of full disclosure (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 19:50:21 -0500
Hey All, Mr. Brown of WSJ is not interested in providing a clear picture of the issues, that's for sure. Check out his website at http://www.simtronics.net -- hey, mabe you'll want to buy his "big bo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00527.html (7,876 bytes)

8. RE: [CQ-Contest] ANOTHER SMELLY SUBJECT (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 11:02:26 -0400
Wah, Wah, Wah... You guys sound like my 18-month-old twin girls!! Have you ever heard of the honor system? If you win a contest or set a record because you ran 10KW, is that honorable? If you lost to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00090.html (11,268 bytes)

9. RE: [CQ-Contest] ANOTHER SMELLY SUBJECT (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 12:48:31 -0400
Bill, You missed my point completely. If you loose a contest to a identifiable, proven cheater, ABSOLUTELY the community should call this person to task (it is up to contest committees to decide if a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00095.html (11,186 bytes)

10. RE: [CQ-Contest] The Next BIG Step in contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:15:27 -0500
Hi Red, As Randy stated, I did build such an application for Writelog, called "Leaderboard Live". It showed all participants Writelog score in real time on a web page, as well as in a window within W
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00515.html (14,318 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] Three Logging Systems now support GetScores.org (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:12:13 -0400
Hello All, Three of the major logging programs are now supporting the Getscores.orginterface -- N1MMLogger, Win-Test, and WriteLog. I just completed a beta version of my WriteLog interface. This can
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00454.html (7,316 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:19:39 -0500
This is a very interesting discussion. If one follows the 500-meter-circle rule, remote operation has always been allowed. Rich, N5ZC, has been doing it for quite a while. When, say, a W6 builds a su
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00249.html (10,109 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:47:21 -0500
Hi Dave, I would say: "Due to politics, contesting is stagnant. Technology is trying to evolve contesting. This is inevitable", but that is a matter of opinion. Nevertheless, there are more fundament
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00265.html (13,393 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 08:56:17 -0500
No offense, Gerry, but you can't be serious! I have no problem with people "thinking outside the box" when it comes to improving technology to make things better. The SteppIR antenna is a case in poi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00268.html (18,212 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:58:25 -0500
Paul, "But, like you say, if the object of the exercise is to just talk to people regardless of where they are, then use Echolink, Skype, or the telephone. I got involved with amateur radio to talk t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00360.html (15,571 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:28:24 -0500
-- Gerry, W1VE/VE1RM Explore real-time competition in ham radio - post your score to http://www.getscores.org! _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00551.html (15,164 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:29:38 -0500
On 3/29/07, Paul J. Piercey <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com> wrote, in part: "Some have argued that opening the door to remote operation will increase the numbers of amateurs on the bands. Frankly, if they
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00656.html (10,298 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote - my 2 centavos worth (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:34:04 -0500
That's just plain wrong. That would make remotely-operated stations -- Gerry, W1VE/VE1RM Explore real-time competition in ham radio - post your score to http://www.getscores.org! ____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00666.html (8,627 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Realtime Scoreboard (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 08:56:50 -0500
Ed, Luis, Ev et Al... There is lots of lively debate on this subject. It seems the hot spot of contention is Single-Operator, Unassisted operation. I do not believe any of us who are pushing the conc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00385.html (14,345 bytes)

20. [WriteLog] New Home for www.getscores.org... (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:53:34 -0400
Hello All, It's coming down to the wire for the big contest season. I've been working for a while to secure a dedicated web server for the getscores site. The old location was on a shared server, and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00331.html (8,334 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu