Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:glhuber@msn.com: 555 ]

Total 555 documents matching your query.

241. Re: [TenTec] Rhombics (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:54:18 -0600
During Desert Storm One, there was a MARS station in Florida which had a Rhombic designed for the short path to Kuwait. I believe each leg was something on the order of 1000 feet providing something
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00187.html (12,905 bytes)

242. Re: [TenTec] receiver specifications ---Eagle (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:04:19 -0600
In casual operation you probably cannot tell the difference is the simple answer. In a pile-up you may be able to tell the difference. In a couple of recent contests I have been able to compare a FLE
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00378.html (10,432 bytes)

243. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs any other (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:28:12 -0600
Jerry, Would you care to comment on http://lists.contesting.com/_tentec/2002-10/msg00602.html (diode ring mixer and transformer feedback circuit of the Corsair) compared to the recent receiver design
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00394.html (9,978 bytes)

244. Re: [TenTec] Eagle vs. any other (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:20:29 -0600
Thanks Jerry. PLL, DSP, and SDR implementation seems much improved over the past ten years for newer radios commonly available to/used by Hams. 73 es DX, Gary - AB9M Most receiver designs use mixers.
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00419.html (14,841 bytes)

245. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 12:08:16 -0600
During the mid 1970's, U.S. ARMY FIELD MANUAL 24-18, Appendix M and other pubs referenced the Near Vertical Incident System antenna and its development to meet a 0 to 500 mile skip-zone free communic
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00569.html (10,789 bytes)

246. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 21:36:45 -0600
Jerry, I quoted from a recent revision of FM 24-18 (my hard copy is dated 13 December 1984) but I do recall a TC (training circular) released between December 76 and mid 1980 while I had unit trainin
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00593.html (11,846 bytes)

247. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 17:37:21 -0600
I am NOT taking sides on this thread, but reporting my twenty five year experience with NVIS and vertical antennas at my location. My conditions are a rural subdivision one acre lot, with several fee
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00114.html (17,883 bytes)

248. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 Logic Board Failure (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:07:52 -0600
Previous reports of Omni 6 logic board failures have stated a IC is no longer available. I have wondered if TenTec could retrofit using a PIC, programmed using the original firmware code parameters.
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00333.html (10,124 bytes)

249. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:55:09 -0600
I believe the most significant result of this discussion thread has been the development of possible failures on the logic board as well as the fixes. Knowing to replace the battery and ICs in order
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00452.html (14,733 bytes)

250. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:16:14 -0600
Mike, You are probably right, but I don't believe I'm going to be overly concerned if it does. The OMNI-VII is a great radio; I believe for my use, after learning to operate it, that its better than
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00459.html (11,318 bytes)

251. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:46:06 -0600
Phil, The 715 works on ANY TT SSB radio. You will need to choose a specific cable to connect with your transceiver's microphone connector and may need a mic adapter for your microphone to terminate o
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00526.html (9,789 bytes)

252. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI 1st IF Narrow CW Filter Enable? (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:51:11 -0600
After looking at a 564 schematic it does appear that Y2 (standard 2.4kHz) could be replaced with a 9 MHz 1.8kHz or 500Hz filter for the roofing filter and N1 and N2 (Y3 and Y4) can be 9MHz CW filters
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00534.html (12,129 bytes)

253. Re: [TenTec] CorsairII notch potentiometer (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 20:38:04 -0600
I have a Corsair II that I use everyday to log PSK-31 DX. With the external VFO and 1.8kHz, 500 Hz, and 250 Hz options, I 've worked a lot of DX with it. I had the digital display recapped and thats
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00233.html (9,030 bytes)

254. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II VFO level? (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:33:26 -0500
That would be a real game changer for those who love their Corsair's capabilities but miss the convenience of the computer interface. 73 es DX, Gary - AB9M My C2 DDS pipe dream: package the DDS/encod
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00208.html (9,411 bytes)

255. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II VFO level? (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:06:11 -0500
It seems to me that a remote 263-G style DDS along with a DDS replacement for the main VFO could provide the DUAL RX capability for the CORSAIR/CORSAIR-II. I would like to have the RA-RB, TA-TB, RAB,
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00212.html (11,155 bytes)

256. Re: [TenTec] does anyone know ? (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:12:52 -0500
The N4PY mod works with the OMNI-VII and Eagle allowing a SDR to operate with a SDR.... that mod does not tap the IF but rather the RX antenna loop. 73 es DX, Gary - AB9M The short answer is no. 73,
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00323.html (7,969 bytes)

257. Re: [TenTec] does anyone know ? (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 21:15:06 -0500
You really need to see a SDR running PowerSDR in panadapter mode to fully appreciate what looking closely to the details of the signal in the bandpass and signals nearby do to help you real-time tune
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00033.html (9,232 bytes)

258. Re: [TenTec] Corsair - blank LED segments (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 20:53:51 -0500
I had a lot of display problems during the years my Corsair II was not used much. After re-capping the display board back in the late nineties and using the Corsair II as my PSK-31 radio almost daily
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00128.html (7,971 bytes)

259. Re: [TenTec] Club Owned TenTec Equipment (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:33:57 -0500
On the Paragon; I had one which developed similar "phase lock loop not locked" symptoms. I sent it back to TT several times, but the fix is relatively simple, make sure the boards are grounded. It ma
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00237.html (9,036 bytes)

260. Re: [TenTec] O3 wish list (score: 1)
Author: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 12:02:57 -0500
It may sound like heresy on this forum, but the use of an external SDR receiver like the Flex-1500 or any basic SDR running PowerSDR via the N4PY sub-RX mod provides the panadapter function without t
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00074.html (11,581 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu