Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk: 293 ]

Total 293 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Crossfield Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:06:11 +0000
Cable radiation, anyone? I've yet to see a review of a CFA/EH that demonstrated the reviewer understood that possibility, took serious precautions against it, and then measured it. Lacking all that,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00328.html (8,452 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] station grounding question (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:03:11 +0000
Don't worry - INSIDE the station, you are not expecting large lightning currents in the RF ground bonding, so the grounding bolts on the backs of the rigs are already quite big enough. The purpose of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00645.html (9,310 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] station grounding question (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 21:42:48 +0000
While not disagreeing with the facts that Eric states, I do think it's putting a possible problem ahead of the main Big Idea of lightning protection. The Big Idea is to create a protected environment
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00682.html (12,601 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] station grounding question (score: 1)
Author: <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:40:42 +0000
Good point. As our stations grow larger and more complex, the 'star' grounding method becomes less and less realistic. You wind up with connections of very different lengths running back to the grou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00780.html (10,669 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Aperture and stacking distance (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 11:54:48 +0000
This is one of those old approximate concepts which gives a useful general understanding, but it is no substitute for modern modeling techniques. For a general discussion, see: http://www.ifwtech.co.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00082.html (10,394 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Radiation angle (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:58:17 +0000
If Bob (who started this thread) buys the ARRL Antenna Handbook to get a copy of HFTA, he'll find that author N6BV approaches the whole problem in a radically different way. Instead of jumping straig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00167.html (12,334 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] Radiation angle (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 17:48:51 +0000
[...] Extending HFTA to vertical polarization has to be top of everybody's wish list... but the whole problem is much more affected by ground conductivity and permittivity a long way out from our ant
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00174.html (10,704 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] crank down automation was Re: Crank Up towers (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:25:31 +0000
A slightly frivolous reply to a very serious question... The Royal Navy's way of dealing with the risks around remotely operated gun mountings is to post a helpful warning notice. I found this messag
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00565.html (9,650 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] Modeling a Cushcraft Beam (score: 1)
Author: GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:03:38 +0000
You'll find some information in my 'VHF/UHF Long Yagi Workshop' pages, including a link to an online calculator. 73 from Ian GM3SEK www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek ___________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00225.html (7,720 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Advances in Antennas [was Building Antennas] (score: 1)
Author: GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:43:54 +0000
There were many VHF long yagi designs developed from the 1940s through the 60s and 70s, but all the amateur designs were based on range measurements with large margins of error. The famous NBS design
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00313.html (8,758 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Building Antennas (score: 1)
Author: GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:58:10 +0000
That is categorically not true. Computer modeling has revolutionized antenna design, so we're using much stronger magic now. (Let's not take the Harry Potter line of argument any further... but I'm m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00314.html (8,670 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: eznec (score: 1)
Author: GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:36:24 +0000
Don't worry - you just happen to have chosen a slightly tricky antenna for your first outing. Roy Lewallen hangs out on the rec.radio.antenna newsgroup, and he also responds to direct e-mails... but
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00397.html (8,041 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Tools for Installing Ground Rod? (score: 1)
Author: "Ian White, GM3SEK" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 07:28:11 +0000
Think about buying an SDS impact drill: http://www.diyfaq.org.uk/powertools/sds.htm These tools are now in the DIY price range, and the difference from your old hammer drill is amazing. Even a small
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00455.html (10,819 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] Tools for Installing Ground Rod? (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 10:07:07 +0000
Ground rods are quite easily stopped by small rocks, but don't give up on the SDS yet. You can buy drill bits up to 1.0 metre long, which do a surprisingly good job of either breaking up the rocks or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00024.html (8,879 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] lightning and insulated elements.. (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:12:35 +0000
No, the extra ionisation was too localised to make any dramatic difference. What they did find was radioactively contaminated rainwater running down lightning conductors... and if one of the radioact
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00162.html (9,215 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] UST HDX589 crank-up tower base on rock? (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:35:57 +0000
"Or both"... interesting idea - has anybody here used it? On a smaller scale - five posts for verticals, rather than a tower - I'll soon have 20 of these anchors to put in, so would welcome any and a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00208.html (8,789 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] UST HDX589 crank-up tower base on rock? (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:45:45 +0000
Thanks for all the replies - and I hope Les is getting as much useful information from my replies as I'm getting from his. I already had your site bookmarked, Joe. That must be the largest dental cro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00217.html (11,763 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] UST HDX589 crank-up tower base on rock? (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:39:38 +0000
Sorry - I should have said "adhesive anchors". Unfortunately my backyard is like that too - a random mix of large and small boulders, everything from granite to slate-like shale, all brought here by
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00218.html (12,849 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] Ideal DXP Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:48:59 +0000
The Spiderbeam is another wire/fibreglass beam that was designed for DXpeditions and has a good track record: www.spiderbeam.net -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK _______________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00053.html (7,234 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing verticals and stubs (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 16:22:12 +0100
Any triangle system can be used with either two or three elements energized - check with ON4UN's book for details. In either case, the most practical and versatile system for beam switching is the eq
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00104.html (9,215 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu