Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:grimm@lynchburg.net: 44 ]

Total 44 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] Ham rotor (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1998 07:32:03 -0400
Shane, Dick has given you the correct hookup for both the Ham M and the Ham II. It is definitely time to get out your VOM and do a little checking inside the box and with your connecting wires. The r
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00198.html (10,453 bytes)

22. [TowerTalk] Ham rotor (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1998 07:45:20 -0400
Sorry about that last post. After re-reading you message, I see that you do have the diagram . Take the HAM II box apart and start checking with the VOM is still my best suggestion and the place I wo
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00200.html (8,009 bytes)

23. [TowerTalk] vert. polarized antenna (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 11:52:40 -0400
Tom, I can sorta see this USIA thing in my mind's eye, but would really like to see and/or hear more about it. Have you got any print refs? If not, could you describe it in greater detail? Tnx OM es
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00406.html (8,133 bytes)

24. [TowerTalk] vert. polarized antenna (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 14:37:12 -0400
Thanks for the references, Henry. I'm off to the library to check them out. I'm sure I will have trouble fitting one of these into the back yard, but they seem to be very interesting critters. 73, Ke
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00447.html (10,344 bytes)

25. [TowerTalk] We're celebrating in Virginia (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 23:55:09 -0400
To see why all of us hams are smiling here in Virginia, have a look at http://rbnet.com/~hamcotec/sb480.html 8*} -- Ken K4XL grimm@lynchburg.net Boatanchor Manual Archive - ftp://198.28.36.115/pub --
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00488.html (7,055 bytes)

26. [TowerTalk] New Discussion Topic: Dipole secrets (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 15:35:48 -0400
Delusions, hell! It is almost a carbon copy of my own installation. Of course mine works better, since K4VUD is too lazy to drain the SWR out of his feedline each year the way I do. I've discovered t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00843.html (9,560 bytes)

27. [TowerTalk] C-3 & TH7 comparison - a revision (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 13:06:06 -0400
What it really, REALLY, demonstrates is that practical dbs are considerably bigger than theoretical dbs. Or, put another way, dbs in the air are better than they are on paper. Love them dbs! 73, -- K
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00914.html (9,043 bytes)

28. [TowerTalk] 402-CD vs. EF-240X (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 13:29:06 -0400
This comment got me to wondering what the advantages of insulated parasitic elements on a beam are. Tom, of Force 12, whose antennas use insulated parasitic elements on yagis once commented that if
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00917.html (9,785 bytes)

29. [TowerTalk] 402-CD vs. EF-240X (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 19:19:15 -0400
Charles will have to speak to the TH-7, but certainly the Hy-Gain monobanders like the 204BA, although having insulated driven elements, were at DC ground through the beta match attached to the boom.
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00941.html (11,447 bytes)

30. [Fwd: Re: [TowerTalk] C-3 & TH7 comparison - a revision] (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 14:42:29 -0400
I'll cast my vote with Steve here. One dB is the smallest change detectable by the human ear. The 3 dB figure is expression for a doubling of power. And the 6 dB thing was an S-unit...until Tom decid
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00994.html (8,231 bytes)

31. [TowerTalk] The Balun Blues (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 1998 23:42:01 -0500
<a bunch of stuff snipped> I've burned up BN-86s and had problems with the W2DU type baluns. Come to think of it, over the years, baluns have been a dependable source of problems! I've finally given
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00050.html (8,691 bytes)

32. [TowerTalk] The Balun Blues (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 1998 15:01:31 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --7377214D6FC97B7CB1D90550 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Well, Steve, since it was the article posted here la
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00083.html (18,416 bytes)

33. [TowerTalk] The Balun Blues (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 1998 15:05:16 -0500
Obviously! 8-) -- Ken K4XL grimm@lynchburg.net -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.c
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00084.html (7,785 bytes)

34. [TowerTalk] Re: Baluns (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 1998 15:34:49 -0500
As I said earlier, I burned up a box full of BN-86s before turning to W2DU style ferrite choke. My latest failure was with a W2DU made by W2AU. It was a heat failure near the antenna end of the choke
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00089.html (8,165 bytes)

35. [TowerTalk] Coaxial Choke Winding Specifications (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 1998 16:21:44 -0500
snip... Oops, I meant to mention this and forgot. Glad you were listening Bob. I made a choke using the 4 1/2 in. sewer pipe as a form and Times LMR-400U. Times Microwave specify the minimum radius f
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00095.html (8,031 bytes)

36. [TowerTalk] PE services (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 11:00:19 -0500
Maybe so, but most of the discussion has been about BX and 20 or 25G. The staple of a modest installation. I think it is a pity that Rohn, for whatever reasons, has chosen to provide so little inform
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00149.html (8,744 bytes)

37. [TowerTalk] PE services (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 21:46:49 -0500
. . .it's gonna cost you $250 up front. ;-) -- Ken K4XL grimm@lynchburg.net -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00188.html (9,441 bytes)

38. [Antennas] Re: [TowerTalk] Balan tech lit - free (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 1998 14:20:00 -0500
Try http://www.adobe.com/acrobat/ -- Ken K4XL grimm@lynchburg.net -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-R
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00254.html (8,231 bytes)

39. [TowerTalk] A4S SWR correction-new problem (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 23:23:49 -0500
If the sloper worked before and you haven't added anything to the antenna farm around it, it's gotta be between the feedpoint and the output of the rig. Have you checked both sides of the connection
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00378.html (8,478 bytes)

40. [TowerTalk] Wireman LMR bargain.(addendum, attn:W1VC) (score: 1)
Author: grimm@lynchburg.net (Kenneth D. Grimm)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 17:07:54 -0500
A more complete description of LMR900 can be had at http://www.timesmicrowave.com/products/commercial/selectguide/ <stuff snipped> 73, -- Ken K4XL grimm@lynchburg.net -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contes
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00424.html (7,667 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu