- 1. [TowerTalk] Round Hole vs Square Hole... (score: 1)
- Author: ham-radio-mail-lists@ahjg.co.uk (Anthony R. Gold)
- Date: Sun Mar 30 07:15:32 2003
- I love the look of that Wilson pole. Is anything similar in current manufacture? Tony
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-03/msg00398.html (8,260 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Round Hole vs Square Hole... (score: 1)
- Author: ham-radio-mail-lists@ahjg.co.uk (Anthony R. Gold)
- Date: Sun Mar 30 12:25:33 2003
- Hi Fred. I was '72, but not much of a party-goer. It looks impressive but I really did want the tilt I saw in W5AJ's Wilson as I like to work near to the ground. Tony
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-03/msg00401.html (8,549 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Round Hole vs Square Hole... (score: 1)
- Author: ham-radio-mail-lists@ahjg.co.uk (Anthony R. Gold)
- Date: Mon Mar 31 05:24:18 2003
- Thanks for the pointer. I can't see much detail - it appears that maybe the towers themselves do not rotate, so the rotator must be put up at the top of the tower. But I'll send of for their catalog
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-03/msg00421.html (8,383 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Need help please? (score: 1)
- Author: "Anthony R. Gold" <ham-radio-mail-lists@ahjg.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:34:41 +0100
- See: http://www.w5gi.com/mysteryantenna.htm Tong G3SKR/W2TG _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00194.html (7,763 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] Non-Tower Question (score: 1)
- Author: "Anthony R. Gold" <ham-radio-mail-lists@ahjg.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 00:30:49 +0100
- Hi all. I recently bought a house on a city lot with protected trees on much of the unbuilt property, so I will have great difficulty planting a tower on the property. I have just received news that
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00603.html (8,116 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 5BA (score: 1)
- Author: "Anthony R. Gold" <ham-radio-mail-lists@ahjg.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 17:14:31 +0100
- It's not suitable in a breezy location, the closely spaced elements wave around and touch each other, then the VSWR goes up and my amp trips out. Tony _______________________________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00849.html (8,117 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 5BA (score: 1)
- Author: "Anthony R. Gold" <ham-radio-mail-lists@ahjg.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 17:38:48 +0100
- Whoops, sorry but I meant that comment about the Force 12 5BA but quoted the wrong post. I have no comment to make on the SteppIR antennas. Tony _______________________________________________ See: h
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00852.html (7,906 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 5BA (score: 1)
- Author: "Anthony R. Gold" <ham-radio-mail-lists@ahjg.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 20:04:54 +0100
- My wrong, that comment was about the 5BA. Fluid Motion insulated plastic tubes couldn't have that "feature" even if they could bend that far. Tony _______________________________________________ See
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00854.html (8,441 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TowerTalk] Baluns/tutorial/notes. (score: 1)
- Author: Anthony R. Gold <ham-radio-mail-lists@ahjg.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 10:22:15 -0400
- But why stop there? Once you get below 1:1, and have trespassed outside the realms of physical reality, you might just as well go negative too. Maybe scientologists could use an SWR meter in place of
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-05/msg00510.html (9,432 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TowerTalk] 75 ohm - v - 50 ohm coax (score: 1)
- Author: Anthony R. Gold <ham-radio-mail-lists@ahjg.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:10:52 +0000
- A good thought, and if you use a 75 ohm VSWR meter you can measure that. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTa
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00267.html (9,426 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu