Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ham_reflectors@wa9als.com: 40 ]

Total 40 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Webmaster for rttyinfo? (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 10:40:55 -0500
If you view the source code for the home page, you will find: mailto:ww3s@zoominternet.net He's smart not to have his call readily detectable by spam robots. However, having it in plain text within t
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00190.html (8,254 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Webmaster for rttyinfo? (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:44:45 -0500
Ed, noone's "exposing" that information - As someone mentioned, the email address appears when you hover your mouse cursor over the email link. I wouldn't have made my post if I thought the informati
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00195.html (8,467 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] RE: Interfaces (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:43:19 -0500
Are you interested in making some cables for less than $10 that even we appliance ops can build, or are you interested in the several-hundred dollar commercial solutions to accomplish the same thing
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00223.html (6,641 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Capable Amp (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:10:29 -0500
Here's my two cents re QRO RTTY: 1. PW-1 - Perfect gallon. Not even warm to the touch. Too expensive. RTTY as long as you like. Boring - just sits there and works all the time. I put it on a bottom s
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00232.html (10,008 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] Ritty with Writelog (score: 1)
Author: WA9ALS - John <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 16:16:39 -0500
I think maybe 3.5 works, but definitely not 2... _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00068.html (7,883 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] Don't send IN during the exchange! (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:02:17 -0500
I have to send 599 IN IN - Then people ask me State? State? thinking I never told them "in where?" Callsign recognition helps a little with this. wasn't one as _______________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00086.html (9,657 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] Don't send IN during the exchange! (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:22:05 -0500
WL picks them up if they're in the Master Callsign Database. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00089.html (10,662 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Dual Receive with WriteLog/MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:52:06 -0500
motivation window I've done it with 2 radios, so same difference if you just split the audio from one radio into 2 soundcards. See http://www.qsl.net/wa9als/so2r-mmttyx2.htm I don't think you could
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00117.html (7,490 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] Operating above 21.100 or 28.100 rtty (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:49:36 -0500
Ah, my favorite "gotchca'! Joe, you are correct. If people don't cut the power up there, they are in violation of FCC rules. I think it's only a problem on 15M, but it's VERY difficult to remember t
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00139.html (7,712 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] 2004 RTTY Roundup -lets stir the pot again! (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:53:48 -0500
Tom, might I suggest a little experiment to validate your concerns? Set up and operate SO2R yourself and show us that you can blow away the competition. I sure can't. In fact, I put up a tower and b
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00153.html (7,728 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] 2004 RTTY Roundup -lets stir the pot again! (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 20:03:28 -0500
SO2R - One radio for MARK and the other for SPACE - Would that violate the rules? Anyone know any chicken jokes? At least we know the reflector still works! 73 _______________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00178.html (9,405 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] RTTY AFSK / PSK-31 with TenTec Orion (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:31:25 -0500
What are the audio input choices? On the 1000MP, audio on the AFSK connector is NOT in the VOX circuit, but the PATCH input is. way from and someone have a ___________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00233.html (8,830 bytes)

13. [RTTY] Re: [WriteLog] Re: Windows 98 page (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:32:49 -0500
Ed, I just looked, and darn it, I couldn't find a thing about RTTY, WriteLog, or CQ-Contest! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contest
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00258.html (8,039 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Reflector (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 21:40:13 -0500
Hi Dick - The link to subscription information (http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty) appears at the bottom of all messages posted to the RTTY list (see below your message). 73 - John, W
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00262.html (7,728 bytes)

15. RE: [RTTY] Concept of a new RTTY Contest (score: 1)
Author: WA9ALS - John <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:10:42 -0500
I support a shorter contest; SARTG format is OK if 24+ hrs are desired. You could even consider SARTG format, but even shorter, say 4-6 hrs for each segment. The super fun contests are those with HUG
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00269.html (11,098 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] Need 5 1/4 inch floppies (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:17:27 -0500
The person who has these is also sure to have an Edsel and a VIC-20! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00279.html (7,101 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] Need 5 1/4 inch floppies (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 22:20:15 -0500
I was surprised to learn recently that there are Commodore emulators for Windows. I have 2 old C-64s, but I'm not sure I have a complete working system. However, my son showed me where to get the emu
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00286.html (8,075 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] CABRILLO TOOLS HELP (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 18:05:07 -0500
The WT4I Contest Tools email reflector has been established to provide additional support of the product. New users are encouraged to subscribe to the email reflector and ask the general user commun
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00328.html (7,821 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] CABRILLO TOOLS HELP (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 06:55:48 -0500
Sort of like the RS-232C "standard"... _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00347.html (7,752 bytes)

20. [RTTY] DAYTON? (score: 1)
Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:40:16 -0500
Frank, N2FF, is back on the reflector after a brief vacation from the list, and he would be interested in what the interest level is in having a RTTY forum at Dayton this year, as well as any interes
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00348.html (6,538 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu