Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com: 143 ]

Total 143 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor damage from Shunt Feeding your tower? (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 09:59:27 -0400
Dick, There is not much to damage inside the Ham IV rotor itself as the wire-wound direction slider can take most induced RF from shunt feeding at normal amateur power levels. The indicator swing can
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-11/msg00236.html (8,979 bytes)

22. [TowerTalk] Is there a good 1:1 Balun for a Beam (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:25:07 -0400
Having ready all the problems with various baluns that rate from junk to near junk I have been using the coiled cable to feed most antennas that require a balanced feed. I would like to hear what is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-11/msg00509.html (7,287 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] Best Balun (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 21:02:45 -0400
Thanks for all the wonderful suggestions (many off line) for a better balun than my BN-86's. I just ordered from Force 12 (Chip K7JA) their bead balun model EB-1 as this is easier for me to install o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-11/msg00532.html (8,586 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun for Quad (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:40:55 -0400
I guess I am to blame for starting this thread in the first place but after hearing an old timer tell me years ago that a balun is only good for hanging your dipole wire on to.... so I wanted some ad
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-11/msg00560.html (9,853 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Choking on chokes (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 06:35:18 -0400
I have always wondered ......... since I have acquired six of those square snap on ferrite blocks if they would provide any sufficient chocking action on my 12 meter or 6 meter beam coax feeds as the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00019.html (11,023 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Crimp-on connectors for hardline. (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:59:09 -0400
I bought some connector on eBay from China to connect LMR-600 to PL-259 male but was not very happy about the results. The price was right but not the performance as the connection appear to feel los
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00030.html (10,533 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] Choking on chokes (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 12:49:15 -0400
I was led to believe that by tie wrapping a rotor cable (along with coax cables) to one tower leg establishes over the cable length sufficient enough distributed capacitance that choking or using RFC
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00046.html (12,666 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole gain? (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:09:49 -0400
Stacking dipoles like in the FM radio world produces significant gain of course. If the dipoles are of the same polarity and properly stacked and fed you can double your radiated power every time you
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00091.html (11,210 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 05:39:56 -0400
Dave, Since the MS spell check now seems to be so important in how we organize our posts, please put in "obamacare" (with a lower case o) and see how bill Gates apparently has a sense of humor. Does
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00075.html (11,291 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor v. Rotator (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 12:36:27 -0400
And oh yes IMHO "position" is so much more important in normal life than "rotation." Herb, KV4FZ On 1/4/2015 12:33 PM, George VE3YV wrote: How is correct word usage (yes, it is Rotator) important to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00088.html (8,207 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: Long shank U-Bolts (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 12:41:42 -0400
And also very important in preventing finger degloving is to never wear a ring....never. Also *never* go without a gloves when climbing towers. A simple slip before the safety belt or fall arrest har
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00090.html (17,052 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor v. Rotator (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 12:43:28 -0400
I was referring to 88s! 73, George VE3YV / K8HI _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00091.html (8,483 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Now THIS is a tower climb! (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 23:09:02 -0400
I once visited a BC station in Trinidad that had the red "on the air" light inside a double panel of glass between the studio and control room. I foolishly asked "do you mean you have to remove one o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00238.html (10,072 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] Removing PL259s (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:55:05 -0400
A small hand held butane torch works for me but be careful not to apply to much heat on those connector that are not Teflon insulated. Herb, KV4FZ There is a plethora of literature on how to place PL
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00379.html (7,588 bytes)

35. [TowerTalk] Rohn 45 to Rohn 25 adapter (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:17:51 -0400
One of my towers starts out with 40 feet of Rohn 45 and I would like to continue with another 20 feet with Rohn 25. (I have the proper top section for Rohn 25 and rotor plate) Currently I use large c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00463.html (7,051 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 45 to Rohn 25 adapter (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 12:01:38 -0400
Thanks Stan for the suggestion. Currently on two towers I have the Rohn 25 inside the 45 about 3 feet and some very good clamps. The top guy is at this point and only about 7 feet is above this of Ro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00468.html (9,261 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 16:24:57 -0400
Depending on how long the fence is IMHO this act like a long unbalanced transmission line with on side grounded thus destroying the wavefront tilt ability of the single wire Beverage. OTOH if you put
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00095.html (10,165 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] rg-59 manufacturer (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 20:54:12 -0400
Don't throw it away....but use it for ground radials as you may require. 73, Jim K9YC S.I.W TYPE RG-59/U-SP-95 MADE IN U.S.A and S.I.W TYPE RG-59/U-P-95 MADE IN U.S.A I am looking for the manufacture
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00251.html (8,756 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] 75 or 70 Ohm twinlead or ladderline cable - does it exist? (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 12:18:37 -0400
Telephone C drop wire may work in your case and it is very strong. I believe the characteristic impedance is 70 ohms. On 3/24/2014 4:15 PM, jpk5lad@cox.net wrote: From where I'm sitting, I can see a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00276.html (10,824 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] Long pole / simple, tall construction for small antenna (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 15:32:23 -0400
Consider small telephone poles...sometimes the used ones that are damaged or compromised by the ground can be sawed off, treated, and replanted with successful results. Expect to pay about $150 for t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-05/msg00193.html (11,028 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu