Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:i4jmy@iol.it: 132 ]

Total 132 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Re: [Towertalk] Freq on Ground and On Tower (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 10:05:56 +0100
Hi Martin, unfortunately you can't test at 10ft and tune the driven element only. Neither adjusting SWR is the proper way to obtain reasonable F/B, BW and gain. Even tilting upward the antenna isn't
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00096.html (9,382 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] IS Boom length the HOLY GRAIL ? (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 00:56:56 +0100
You forgot the only real advantage of a 2 elements quad over a 2 elements yagi, a better F/B. All the rest about gain, efficiency and take off angle is a pure mith, just like when an antenna manufact
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00398.html (9,171 bytes)

3. [Towertalk] Re: [Towertalk] Quad vs Yagi (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:27:40 +0100
Comparing apples with oranges may lead that a banana is longer. Differrent modeling software converge that gain of a 2 elements optimized quad is not significatively different than gain of a two elem
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00418.html (10,038 bytes)

4. [Towertalk] Re: [Towertalk] Re: [Towertalk] Quad vs Yagi (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:51:53 +0100
i.e. a 2 element quad vs a trapped tribander (but bananas can be fried) 73, Mauri I4JMY
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00422.html (6,592 bytes)

5. [Towertalk] Coax Baluns TT101 (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:49:46 +0200
This is a correct point, but not the only reason to have a choke near the element. The piece of line that runs between the feed element and the coil is infact a part of the antenna, another antenna.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00362.html (8,114 bytes)

6. [Towertalk] split feed antennas (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 19:26:36 +0200
If you don't mind a single band device, then put two quarterwave 75 ohm lines, each one in series with each antenna line at the before the T; if SWR is good, then also the power is spliting reasonabl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00643.html (7,735 bytes)

7. [Towertalk] lmr 400 question (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 18:56:26 +0200
it Yes, it's known trick to use semi rigid cables like cellflex in rotable systems. 73, Mauri I4JMY
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00659.html (8,396 bytes)

8. [Towertalk] Re: [Towertalk] Pattern (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:19:35 +0200
Hi Dan, I've no experience with boom loaded dipoles, but with self supporting loaded dipoles on low bands yes. I think a 140 ft high dipole on 80m will be an efficient transmitting antenna meanwhile
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00360.html (8,896 bytes)

9. [Towertalk] Co-ax Traps (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:52:49 +0200
No, it is not important. Although easy to build, coax traps have more losses than conventional ones and don't handle much power. 73, Mauri I4JMY
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00800.html (7,236 bytes)

10. [Towertalk] Co-ax Traps (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 19:33:06 +0200
I do not understand your answer. Do You mean that a parallel resonant circuit used as a trap is not reversible ? Why ? ones I must disagree, its a compromise. No one would use other than vacuum, air
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00806.html (8,599 bytes)

11. [Towertalk] Re: [Towertalk] KLM Tribanders (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 09:29:19 +0200
A dual trace oscilloscope is a good instrument to check the phase (and balance) of KLM baluns. The balun on the installed antenna should be temporary removed and checked. In any case the coax to the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00000.html (7,866 bytes)

12. [Towertalk] 160m Inverted L (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 14:31:18 +0200
Rr has NOT to be confused with the resistive part of the complex impedance, in the series form, that one you're actually reading. In other words, if the resistive part of the complex impedance would
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00342.html (11,052 bytes)

13. [Towertalk] Antennas vs. Antennae (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 16:16:14 +0200
Many English words, especially in biology, medicine, and law, have been adopted from Latin or Greek. Although most English words form their plurals simply by adding the letter 's', this is not true o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00674.html (8,239 bytes)

14. [Towertalk] Antennas vs. Antennae (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 21:16:21 +0200
Guy, things are different than you reported above (in Latin), and anywai I don't see why to be so excited for well known things. Subjective Antenna pl. Antennae Genitive Antennis Antennarum Dative A
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00678.html (9,162 bytes)

15. [Towertalk] Fw: Vertical Monoband Log periodic Antenna for contesting (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 20:37:20 +0200
The gap with vertical polarization over an average ground is in the poor energy radiated below the pseudo brewster angle and also the missing of signal enforcement (up to 6 dB) by ground reflections.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00133.html (11,844 bytes)

16. [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 17:00:09 +0200
When one uses a very short vertical radiator, rarely it happens that a good and extensive RF ground system is instead available. All considerations about nearly good grounds and antenna loading are m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00163.html (16,804 bytes)

17. [Towertalk] Re: [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:01:17 +0200
rrent This is correct if the antenna current distribution is or remains almost linear, in other words if the antenna is full size or only slightly loaded. Hence ve When an antenna is very short one
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00183.html (9,016 bytes)

18. [Towertalk] Re: [Towertalk] F12 C4S (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:20:05 +0200
Transmitting is not everything and a dipole has a low rejection of unwanted signals from high angles, it's F/S is quite objectionable to be considered directivity at medium high elevations. If this w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00187.html (9,189 bytes)

19. [Towertalk] Re: [Towertalk] F12 C4S (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:10:12 +0200
Unless during flares, the 40m ground floor is definitely higher than average man made urban noise, at least here. In any case, after than having seen this concept "reprinted" for decades on books, i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00191.html (7,203 bytes)

20. [Towertalk] Re: [Towertalk] Inverted "L" on 40/80? (score: 1)
Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:49:00 +0200
An efficient dipole, placed at a minimum of 1/2 Wl from ground can have some transmitting gain on 40m when compared to a single element efficient vertical, may be... The calssical inverted V dipole o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00264.html (8,945 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu