Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jc_ki7y@q.com: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] False Signals (score: 1)
Author: Jim CASSIDY <jc_ki7y@q.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:10:04 +0000
This thread reminds me of an incident that happened to me when operating from TI5 a few years ago. I was running DX stations and a heckler came on, high speed CW and repeatedly telling me I was a lid
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00387.html (7,661 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Jim CASSIDY <jc_ki7y@q.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:15:46 +0000
Seems to me that self spotting is similar to CQing on a band with a second transmitter as well as being thru the internet. I suppose there would be no problem with that if allowed in an assisted clas
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00277.html (6,960 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] WW Rule question (score: 1)
Author: Jim CASSIDY <jc_ki7y@q.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:53:09 +0000
I have a question regarding operators in the CQ WW contests. Is there any rule that prohibits an operator from operating at a Multi Op station and also at his own station with his own call? TNX 73 Ji
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00224.html (6,500 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is QSL Bureau pertinent in today HAM Radio (score: 1)
Author: Jim Cassidy <jc_ki7y@q.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:40:24 -0400 (EDT)
I am a Bureau sorter in the 7th call area bureau. I thought I would add some insight from the volunteers perspective. Its not a huge time consumer to handle the cards but has many small hassles that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00215.html (10,699 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted (score: 1)
Author: Jim Cassidy <jc_ki7y@q.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 20:50:30 -0400 (EDT)
If this use of questionable assistance is of such importance why not use it and enter the Assisted class??? No question about that being OK. -- Jim Cassidy KI7Y ______________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00214.html (6,880 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX and LOTW (score: 1)
Author: Jim Cassidy <jc_ki7y@q.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:48:07 -0400 (EDT)
A lot of the sorting for the ARRL outgoing QSL Bureau is done by volunteers. I have a couple of friends who have done quite a lot of it. 73 Jim KI7Y Two points -- 1) A number of US organizations have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00283.html (10,880 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX and LOTW (score: 1)
Author: Jim Cassidy <jc_ki7y@q.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:11:29 -0400 (EDT)
I should have added that the incoming bureau cards are also handled by all volunteers at the call area level. I am involved with the 7th area bureau and we have 27 volunteers that sort and distribute
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00284.html (12,100 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRL? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Cassidy <jc_ki7y@q.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:47:09 -0500 (EST)
I am puzzled by the technique of asking QRL? and then starting a CQ about 1 or 1.5 seconds later. Even K4BAI probably cannot get to his paddle quick enough to reply. 73 KI7Y Following the Stew Perry
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00145.html (7,883 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Poisson d'Avril ? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Cassidy <jc_ki7y@q.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 14:36:10 -0400 (EDT)
Was that to be a battery QRP entry??? Hi Jim Yes, I noticed it wasn't on the schedule. I worked it any way and did pretty good. Didn't make any Q's but had lots of multipliers. I wanted to try out my
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00143.html (9,400 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] HF Triplexers (score: 1)
Author: Jim Cassidy <jc_ki7y@q.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:34:12 -0400 (EDT)
I have used the Inrad triplexer and Dunestar single band filters for Field Day a couple of years ago. The whole setup worked really well and allowed us to use all 3 bands at the same time at the 100w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-03/msg00176.html (7,494 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] W1AW/5 in SS. "everyone was affected the same way, so nn problem" (score: 1)
Author: Jim Cassidy <jc_ki7y@q.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 12:52:27 -0400 (EDT)
In the case of W1AW/5 and another W1AW/ call, it was not the same station, just the same call. This is a complicated issue. According to the Sweepstakes rules: "6.1. Work each station only once, rega
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00210.html (9,395 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] latency and code readers (score: 1)
Author: Jim Cassidy <jc_ki7y@q.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:55:30 -0500 (EST)
I think some of the latency might be due to computer logging and some having difficulty getting the call entered correctly, and the need to do that before starting the CW sending. -- Jim Cassidy KI7Y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00537.html (6,669 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Leading Zeros etc.- I hate'm ! (score: 1)
Author: Jim Cassidy <jc_ki7y@q.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 21:26:35 -0400 (EDT)
I had a couple of stations who would not confirm the Two but kept on saying no and repeating Zero Zero Two. And some even go as far as 0002. KI7Y In Phone or CW contests. Especially later in the cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00283.html (9,492 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Q-signal (score: 1)
Author: Jim Cassidy <jc_ki7y@q.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 18:02:04 -0400 (EDT)
It is good to see that this Summer rules discussion did start about on time In the interest of saving bandwidth, I propose we redefine the QRU Q-signal to mean "Rules Unfair". Usage: "QRU (contest na
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00135.html (8,170 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] MULTIPLIER BELL (score: 1)
Author: Jim Cassidy <jc_ki7y@q.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 15:15:19 -0400 (EDT)
Years ago stations used mechanical bells at each position, like used by businesses on counters. I have always wanted to rig up a doorbell for CQWW with the single ding for a mult and the ding-dong fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-09/msg00178.html (8,680 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu