- 1. Topband: ARRL 160 contest (score: 1)
- Author: jcclark@prexar.com (Craig Clark)
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 08:54:53 -0500
- Gentleman: Pete's question was not specifically about the window. Let's not mix messages. It was abt a lack of DX activity. There has never been a compelling reason for DX stations to participate in
- /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00149.html (9,542 bytes)
- 2. Topband: QRSS (score: 1)
- Author: jcclark@prexar.com (Craig Clark)
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:18:02 -0500
- For those in "the know," is QRSS similiar to what the US Navy uses for sub communications at VLF frequencies? 73, Craig Clark, K1QX RADIOWARE AND RADIO BOOKSTORE PO BOX 209 RINDGE NH 03461 603 899 69
- /archives//html/Topband/2002-11/msg00087.html (7,266 bytes)
- 3. Topband: too young for topband ! (?) (score: 1)
- Author: jcclark@prexar.com (Craig Clark)
- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 08:52:15 -0400
- Funny comment. I have been a dedicated op on 160 since 1972...................at age 21........ Learned a lot from the guys on then and yes they were older but they were kind and generous with their
- /archives//html/Topband/2002-10/msg00078.html (7,501 bytes)
- 4. Topband: DX window (score: 1)
- Author: Craig Clark <jcclark@prexar.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:36:01 -0500
- First of all, the key is if DX CQ's in the "window" they have to QSX OUT of the window. Secondly, the FCC will never mandate a "DX window." Good DX on 160 to all in 2004! At 11:32 PM 12/28/2003, you
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00262.html (8,937 bytes)
- 5. Topband: 160 meter fun (score: 1)
- Author: Craig Clark <jcclark@prexar.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 08:38:01 -0500
- There are two very nice parts of this thread: his book) due to my own marginal activity. Here's my contribution: With over 30 years on the band, working JA's on 160 has been right at the top of my mo
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00204.html (9,341 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu