Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jim@luxfamily.com: 308 ]

Total 308 documents matching your query.

241. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun for C3 (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 12:05:45 -0800
I'd pick something UV resistant (some polycarbonate is, some isn't) - but I like the general idea - that lets the choke be in the open air, for better cooling. Zip ties if UV resistant are ok, but wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00190.html (8,582 bytes)

242. Re: [TowerTalk] TIC plastic gears (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 10:32:41 -0800
What about Stock Drive Products: https://www.sdp-si.com/products/Gears/Index.php specifically http://shop.sdp-si.com/catalog/?cid=p207&filter=a6%3A2%3A55.0&sort=a59&view=table They've got a fair numb
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00028.html (9,181 bytes)

243. Re: [TowerTalk] Just for fun reading: Mysterious antennas near Salt Lake City (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 16:13:12 -0800
73, Charlie, N0TT _______________________________________________ https://youtu.be/lARsgBr3SGg is the KSL-TV story.. I'm surprised they didn't just take a spectrum analyzer and watch them (in situ). 
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00043.html (8,506 bytes)

244. Re: [TowerTalk] Just for fun reading: Mysterious antennas near Salt Lake City (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 16:37:18 -0800
s-found-throughout-foothills-of-salt-lake-city/ 73, Charlie, N0TT _______________________________________________ https://youtu.be/lARsgBr3SGg is the KSL-TV story.. I'm surprised they didn't just ta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00044.html (10,898 bytes)

245. Re: [TowerTalk] DIY Air Wound Coils (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 21:23:34 -0800
Grant, after seeing several neat coil form designs in the style of Air Dux, I've been wondering if a precisely shaped groove might hold the wire reliably without glue. I imagine it snapping into plac
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00071.html (9,249 bytes)

246. [TowerTalk] K7NV archive was Re: Tower Collapse in South Dakota (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 11:31:24 -0800
Speaking of our dearly departed K7NV: Since his website is defunct, has someone acquired that content and posted it somewhere else yet? https://web.archive.org/web/20220929233431/http://k7nv.com/note
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00087.html (8,866 bytes)

247. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Collapse in South Dakota (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 14:57:01 -0800
From a regulatory standpoint the latter isn't really workable. The adjacent property owner could build a new structure (barring setbacks, etc.) that's closer to the boundary, after the tower is up. _
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00089.html (9,223 bytes)

248. Re: [TowerTalk] Common Mode Choke Locations (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 07:08:15 -0800
I'm not trying to promote choke overkill, but look at it this way. If it is a truly high impedance CMC at the antenna, the shield of the remaining coax run to the shack is essentially a receiving ant
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00121.html (10,364 bytes)

249. Re: [TowerTalk] Ring Rotors (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 10:48:40 -0800
Although my 7 K0XG R65 rings have worked great minus one motor failure, I would do side mounts for future (unlikely) towers. The advantages of side mounts are lower cost & weight, using standard rota
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00132.html (9,036 bytes)

250. Re: [TowerTalk] Ring Rotors (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 11:23:02 -0800
Although my 7 K0XG R65 rings have worked great minus one motor failure, I would do side mounts for future (unlikely) towers. The advantages of side mounts are lower cost & weight, using standard rota
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00134.html (11,040 bytes)

251. Re: [TowerTalk] Amplified Receiving Loop Size (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:12:38 -0800
I've been experimenting with an amplified receiving loop for 160/80 and trying to come up with a loop size that gives the best s/n ratio. I found that smaller loops in the 1.5 to 2 foot diameter rang
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00157.html (8,710 bytes)

252. Re: [TowerTalk] More Radials = Higher SWR??? (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2023 19:57:01 -0800
On 2/5/23 5:29 PM, Steve Jones wrote: Dennis, Use an antenna analyzer to see what's going on. I recently used a RigExpert AA-54 to tune up my 160M vertical with elevated radials. It provides a lot of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-02/msg00018.html (9,200 bytes)

253. Re: [TowerTalk] More Radials = Higher SWR??? (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2023 20:18:41 -0800
On 2/5/23 8:11 PM, Jim Brown wrote: On 2/5/2023 7:57 PM, Lux, Jim wrote: One of the nice things with the VNA is that you can do a calibration at the end of the coax, so you don't have to figure out w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-02/msg00020.html (10,494 bytes)

254. Re: [TowerTalk] More Radials = Higher SWR??? (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2023 20:59:44 -0800
On 2/5/23 8:41 PM, Jim Brown wrote: On 2/5/2023 8:18 PM, Lux, Jim wrote: I just do a cal with the coax, putting the O,S,L at the end. Then between that measurement, and the no coax cal, you've got th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-02/msg00022.html (10,620 bytes)

255. Re: [TowerTalk] More Radials = Higher SWR??? (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 14:41:29 -0800
On 2/8/23 2:35 PM, K8LX wrote: YES, absolutely. That mode plus the stub length calculations are extremely useful. The beauty of these self contained analyzers is how easy they are to use in the field
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-02/msg00033.html (12,217 bytes)

256. Re: [TowerTalk] More Radials = Higher SWR??? (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 16:17:24 -0800
I should have clarified that I was speaking of the Rig Expert line. I'm wondering whether the ability to store multiple cal's on other units would overcome the ease of use of the AA devices - great U
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-02/msg00039.html (10,462 bytes)

257. Re: [TowerTalk] Looking for typical size attic info (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 08:45:06 -0800
On 2/13/23 6:29 AM, Chuck Dietz wrote: I understand many (all?) of the newer houses have insulation with aluminum foil backing inside the roof. My friends who have HOA restrictions, put antennas on t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-02/msg00048.html (14,162 bytes)

258. Re: [TowerTalk] Looking for typical size attic info (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 10:47:19 -0800
Be interesting to know 'who told you'. In Texas if you were not informed during the closing and/or not given a copy of the deed restrictions then you can sue the real estate agent and the title comp
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-02/msg00053.html (9,860 bytes)

259. Re: [TowerTalk] Looking for typical size attic info (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 11:23:07 -0800
Yeah, it's that "laches" thing - the problem is, it's non trivial to contest it, regardless if it has any chance of success.  That is you've got to find an attorney who will do the motion to dismiss,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-02/msg00055.html (9,075 bytes)

260. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: How To Remove Tarnish off Bare Copper Wires (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 15:59:33 -0800
Rick N6RK And rinse well afterwards! On 2/18/2023 1:25 PM, Steve Jones wrote: How about Brasso?  We always used it to clean copper cable stubs at Farinon before shipping the microwave radio racks to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-02/msg00092.html (11,808 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu