Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jimlux@earthlink.net: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: [TowerTalk] Reminder - Deadline for Comments on BroadbandOver Powerline NOI (score: 1)
Author: jimlux@earthlink.net (Jim Lux)
Date: Thu Jul 3 10:36:15 2003
I'd also mention that all too many of those comments seem to be along the lines of "BPL will make HF unusable, don't do it" When the FCC has said that BPL is a done deal, and they're just looking for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00045.html (13,064 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Bad news for BPL = Good news for us (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 07:29:51 -0700
You hope... But what about all those BPL advocates and lobbyists who will be thrown out on the street to wreak havoc and mayhem if left to their own devices? I've always thought that BPL is more a cl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00295.html (8,230 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] [CQ-Contest] Bad news for BPL = Good news for us (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:07:42 -0700
I think you are misinterpreting my comment. My comment *is* that BPL isn't a very good way to bring broadband to the hinterlands, just as you say. However, it *is* also a good way to provide employme
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00299.html (9,474 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] [CQ-Contest] Bad news for BPL = Good news for us (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:14:06 -0700
Sure, there are better ways to do SCADA, but the utility already owns the wires, and if they can convince someone to allow them to do data transmission on the regulated side(or even subsidizing bring
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00302.html (9,890 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Green Power Lightbulb QRN (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:02:14 -0700
There is a huge variability in RFI among various brands and models. In theory, they meet FCC standards (Part 15? or maybe exempted as lighting equipment or because the switching rate is low enough o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00413.html (7,808 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu