Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jimlux@earthlink.net: 5229 ]

Total 5229 documents matching your query.

281. Re: [TowerTalk] analysis request (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 13:46:52 -0800
You've got to look at the material to find out if the inductance or resistance at the frequency of interest will dominate. You also might want to figure out how much power is being dissipated in the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00420.html (9,027 bytes)

282. Re: [TowerTalk] Replacement Cable for Wilson MT61 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:05:47 -0800
Wire rope (aka cable) isn't all that exotic a material. What's the diameter and number of strands? There's several places in L.A. that sell rigging stuff of various kinds. What are the ends like (thi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00471.html (8,620 bytes)

283. Re: [TowerTalk] Antennas "Looking Through" Other Antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 06:27:34 -0800
In the classic phrase: it depends... For yes... it does depend on the physical dimensions of the objects as well as the frequency. Throw in traps and it gets even more exciting.. This is why antenna
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00474.html (9,896 bytes)

284. Re: [TowerTalk] Replacement Cable for Wilson MT61 (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:13:17 -0800
At 10:42 AM 12/17/2003 -0600, FireBrick wrote: I'm not affiliated but have had great success, help, and advice from: http://versales.com They will supply cables, thimbles, press fittings, and assembl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00483.html (8,450 bytes)

285. (long) RE: [TowerTalk] One more ground radial question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:44:58 -0800
At 04:49 PM 12/17/2003 +0000, kb9cry@comcast.net wrote: I would agree 5 radials just won't cut it and your theory of impedance changing during rain is probably right on. Also your planned number of r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00484.html (16,422 bytes)

286. Re: [TowerTalk] One more ground radial question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 15:43:04 -0800
At 10:40 PM 12/17/2003 +0000, Rob Atkinson, K5UJ wrote: Y Fresh water (rain) does not have anywhere near the conductivity of salt water. It alone on your radial field should not make a drastic differ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00498.html (11,102 bytes)

287. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: One more ground radial question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 06:51:33 -0800
Hard to do, in a practical sense... You'd need a measurement receiver in an airplane, helicopter, balloon etc, because the field strength at "ground level" isn't really what you're interested. Perhap
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00512.html (12,068 bytes)

288. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: One more ground radial question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 07:10:45 -0800
Someone probably has made this kind of measurement, but, it was probably for ground wave and for 1MHz (i.e. AM Broadcast) and the measurement was made at ground level. There has been a fair amount of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00513.html (15,577 bytes)

289. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: One more ground radial question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 09:32:45 -0800
At 05:09 PM 12/18/2003 +0100, Jan Erik Holm wrote: You need no helicopter. In practical sense just measure the ground wave. We are not trying to confirm loobes in the vertcal plane, then you need hel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00518.html (15,410 bytes)

290. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: One more ground radial question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 09:39:53 -0800
Interesting point you raise... In the near field, the radials are mostly there to provide a "return path" or image for the current in the vertical. The question would be whether that "image" gets ben
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00519.html (12,582 bytes)

291. [TowerTalk] Radials, density, etc. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:22:16 -0800
I did some experimenting with NEC on a radial field that is uneven. A radial every 15 degrees (24 in a circle) on one side, and every 30 degrees on the other. Not a fancy model, in free space, just t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00526.html (7,339 bytes)

292. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: One more ground radial question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:21:44 -0800
Sounds about right... they'd be measuring ground wave (since that's what's of interest for AM broadcast) -- Original Message -- From: "Paul Playford" <w8aef@worldnet.att.net> To: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@ea
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00541.html (13,330 bytes)

293. Re: [TowerTalk] New? Cable (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 07:58:08 -0800
Is this actual LMR400 (from Times Microwave, http://www.timesmicrowave.com/) or some knockoff? It's hard to tell, but it's kind of telling that they say "meets LMR400 specifications"... One might won
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00637.html (9,285 bytes)

294. Re: [TowerTalk] New? Cable (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 09:58:49 -0800
toss heard RG-8 is a published specification in the public domain. Anyone can make something, call it RG-8, and as long as it meets the published specification, they're perfectly ok to do so. If the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00641.html (13,540 bytes)

295. Re: [TowerTalk] New? Cable (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 15:48:59 -0800
Indeed, I AM quite the cynic, when it comes to the wireless industry, or importers of off-shore illegal knockoffs. I'd be even worse if you were talking about the entertainment industry. Actually, I'
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00650.html (9,771 bytes)

296. Re: [TowerTalk] New? Cable (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 20:57:52 -0800
I agree with Joe here... I don't mean to impugn Jefatech.. just their webpage (the single page linked..by the way) seems to imply that they are selling LMR400, but not quite.. And, practically speaki
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00661.html (12,029 bytes)

297. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: JEFA Tech Cable - Direct from the company (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 21:06:52 -0800
Outstanding.. and they even responding over the weekend.. I am impressed.. I would caution on a few issues, not that they're relevant to Jefetech. ISO9001 doesn't mean that a product is of good quali
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00663.html (12,240 bytes)

298. Re: [TowerTalk] wind calcs (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 07:15:08 -0800
If you're just looking for ballpark (i.e. not suitable for filing with the regulatory officials), recall that aerodynamic loads go as the square of the wind speed. Load is proportional to ( area * sp
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00671.html (8,206 bytes)

299. Re: [TowerTalk] Locating Tower Guy Points (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 11:50:06 -0800
This is what surveying is all about. A reasonably competent surveyor could come out and stake out everything you need fairly quickly. You could probably do it yourself, if you had a friend to help ho
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00677.html (10,649 bytes)

300. Re: [TowerTalk] GROUND RADIAL SYSTEM MAGAZINE ARTICLES (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:07:09 -0800
At 02:40 PM 12/22/2003 -0600, hasan schiers wrote: In QST sometime in the last 3 or 4 months there was an EXCELLENT article that showed how to put down the most efficient radial system for any given
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00690.html (13,230 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu