Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jimlux@earthlink.net: 5229 ]

Total 5229 documents matching your query.

381. Re: [TowerTalk] Auto antenna tuner (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 07:00:35 -0800
There aren't a huge number of autotuners that can handle the high power (most are aimed at the 200W and under market).. I like my LDG tuners. Others have had good luck with the SGC line. Things to th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00608.html (9,979 bytes)

382. Re: [TowerTalk] Bang for the buck? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 07:10:11 -0800
Most of the crank-up towers are advertised with 70 mph ratings, but it is difficult for me to translate that to 85 mph, as I understand that the wind loading goes up exponentially. Back of the envelo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00609.html (8,333 bytes)

383. Re: [TowerTalk] Auto antenna tuner (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:54:12 -0800
I can hazard a guess as to why. It's mostly marketing.. At that power level, you'll have a fair amount of money into your whole system. Most hams probably don't go out and buy the whole QRO setup all
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00617.html (10,308 bytes)

384. Re: [TowerTalk] Auto antenna tuner (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:10:45 -0800
Because the tuner should really be at the antenna, not at the amplifier. Otherwise, you've got circulating reactive currents flowing through the feedline to the tuner and back, which just goes to hea
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00620.html (8,878 bytes)

385. Re: [TowerTalk] Tension on tramline (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 08:22:04 -0700
They're all cases of catenary curves, and a bit of googling will find a lot of detail Try http://home.earthlink.net/~w6rmk/math/catenary.htm for some equations which might help. getting antennas weig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00029.html (10,420 bytes)

386. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna impedence and ground impedence?? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 13:18:55 -0700
Yes and no... First off, impedance is complex (it has both a real (resistance) and imaginary (reactance) part). A loaded antenna is using a reactive component to "counteract" the reactive component
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00120.html (8,642 bytes)

387. Re: [TowerTalk] UBC On-Line? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 13:23:41 -0700
Indeed... Title 24 isn't online (except for certain sections), since it's a copyrighted code (one of those nifty peculiarities). You'll have to go to the library. In general, all California laws are
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00127.html (9,480 bytes)

388. Re: [TowerTalk] UBC On-Line? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 13:30:18 -0700
Forgot to mention in last response.. Since you're going to have to have a licensed PE sign the plans, they'll have the code handy, and will have no problem making the statement on the title sheet. I'
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00128.html (10,685 bytes)

389. Re: [TowerTalk] Using riding mower to run radials (2nd Try) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 09:16:06 -0700
At 08:47 AM 4/12/2004 -0700, Dan Bookwalter wrote: Anyone have a good design for an attachment to fit a riding mower to slice the ground, put the wire down and cover it back up ??? yes i am lazy :-)
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00140.html (8,983 bytes)

390. RE: [TowerTalk] Using riding mower to run radials (2nd Try) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 11:03:51 -0700
At 12:05 PM 4/12/2004 -0500, Wendell Wyly - W5FL wrote: Unfortunately, almost ALL 3 point hitches DO NOT apply any downward pressure - only upward pressure. This is true on nearly all tractors. -- On
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00146.html (10,014 bytes)

391. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna impedence and ground impedence?? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 22:24:33 -0700
resistance HF anything what George Hagn (formerly at SRI) did a lot of work on measuring actual ground parameters at RF, using a open two wire transmission line. He actually started using dipoles (f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00165.html (13,322 bytes)

392. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna impedence and ground impedence?? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 06:01:39 -0700
real This was the approach that George Hagn started with. He was looking at propagation and antenna designs in SouthEast Asia, especially for field expedient antennas (i.e. no multi element beams on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00172.html (12,376 bytes)

393. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna impedence and ground impedence?? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 06:21:17 -0700
frequencies, the I don't know that it's particularly difficult to get measurements to a few percent. Tedious, perhaps, but not requiring any real special equipment. A standard antenna impedance analy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00176.html (11,336 bytes)

394. [TowerTalk] Re: Accuracy of models (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 06:26:21 -0700
-- Original Message -- From: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> To: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; <towertalk@contesting.com>; "Pete Smith" <n4zr@contesting
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00177.html (11,516 bytes)

395. Re: [TowerTalk] Staples for radials (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 12:39:10 -0700
How would this work for the feed line? I have a Gap vertical I put up over the winter. Now that the ground is thawed I need to do something about the coax feed into the house. It's presently laying o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00197.html (8,892 bytes)

396. [TowerTalk] the value (or not) of modeling (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:27:10 -0700
Periodically on TT (and in other forums) the issue of modeling, accuracy of modeling, and the value of modeling comes up. I thought I'd throw out my thoughts for comment. First, I'd like to start wit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00213.html (11,762 bytes)

397. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 4 Element Yagi - Analysis and Thoughts (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:16:17 -0700
-- Original Message -- From: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net> To: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; "'G.E. Tucker'" <gtucker@bostoneng.com>; "'Dan Levin'" <djl@andlev.com>; <towertalk@contesting.co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00222.html (10,272 bytes)

398. Re: [TowerTalk] Underground PVC Tubing? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 04:02:18 -0700
Schedule 40 and "schedule A" or "125 psi" aren't the same thing. Sch 40 is thicker wall. Sch 80 is even thicker. Electrical and water Sch40 PVC conduit are about the same cost. The water pipe is whit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00237.html (8,972 bytes)

399. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax & Control Wires ~ Crankup Tower (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 07:50:30 -0700
Hello Towertalkians. This forum provides a wealth of knowledge! I have a question about how to handle the coaxes and control wire that come off my 50' Aluma tower crank up tower. I ran these, 2 coaxe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00244.html (8,889 bytes)

400. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [Amps] Relays for RF switching (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 06:10:06 -0700
If you're truly interested in reducing the losses and parasitic L, then you could always look into Litz wire. It's available from specialty wire companies like MWS (in Westlake Village, CA) and other
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00354.html (12,045 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu