Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jimr.reid@verizon.net: 87 ]

Total 87 documents matching your query.

61. [TowerTalk] Thermal Noise Levels (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 13:33:28 -1000
Wow, thank you to the several who have confirmed my dim memory, hi. I rcv'd both private and reflector responses, some in great detail, working it all out. -114 dBm ( or most accurately calculated by
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00609.html (7,692 bytes)

62. [TowerTalk] 72 ohm transmitting twin lead (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 07:49:04 -1000
And that stuff is very difficult to work with!! Very tough insulation, and the conductors are spaced very close together. Just try and strip the insulation neatly, hi. I have fought with it several
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00154.html (7,673 bytes)

63. [TowerTalk] vertical antennas math & 1/2 waves (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 10:59:11 -1000
And, because half wave verticals have very INTENSE E fields at the base of the vertical, they still need LOTS of radials! As WWVH learned out here on Kauai. See: http://www.boulder.nist.gov/timefreq
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00363.html (8,543 bytes)

64. [TowerTalk] Re: Force12 (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 11:37:15 -1000
Force 12 spec depends upon 100 feet of coax: Some years ago, Dave Leeson, now W6NL posted the explanation here on Tower Talk. The length of line creates a double tuned transformer which per theory do
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00082.html (9,848 bytes)

65. [TowerTalk] Viking KW matchbox. (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 16:30:50 -1000
Well, my kW Matchbox Manual has the brand new price of $124.50 printed directly on it. Of course, that was decades ago, hi. Have no idea what today's price might be. Mine works fine, by the way. Use
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00324.html (8,526 bytes)

66. [TowerTalk] Competent and Reliable Wire/Cable Seller (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:16:15 -1000
Go to "The Wireman", Press Jones, N8UG!! 73, Jim KH7M List Sponsored by AN Wireless: AN Wireless handles Rohn tower systems, Trylon Titan towers, coax, hardline and more. Also check out our self sup
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00190.html (8,069 bytes)

67. [AMPS] Re: [TowerTalk] True Or Not True #2 (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:27:10 -1000
You do not divide dB, you add or subtract them. dB's are logarithms or ratios of powers. Zero dB is equal to unity power ratio, or no change in power. A zero dB s/n means both are equal in power lev
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00246.html (8,896 bytes)

68. [AMPS] Re: [TowerTalk] True Or Not True #2 (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:31:35 -1000
Correction: dBs are logarithms OF ratios of power. Jim KH7M List Sponsored by AN Wireless: AN Wireless handles Rohn tower systems, Trylon Titan towers, coax, hardline and more. Also check out our sel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00248.html (8,680 bytes)

69. [TowerTalk] Twin Tower Engineering/Collapse (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 09:39:24 -1000
LONG Perhaps of interest to those into the mechanics of tower design. By a professor of mechanical/structural engineering: "The twin towers were designed by Leslie Robertson, structural engineer from
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00463.html (12,069 bytes)

70. [TowerTalk] Twin Tower Engineering/Collapse (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 11:06:52 -1000
Hi again, For those interested, here is a link with much more/better info on the building design, construction, the "tube" explanation (I needed, hi) and many comments by other structrual engineers a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00465.html (7,797 bytes)

71. [TowerTalk] Re: Magnetic Declination (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 10:58:49 -1000
Yes, my F12 C4, 2 el/band beam (C3 plus 40 meter dipole) has a 3 dB beam about 90 degrees wide; this per the test data by K7LXC and N0AX, "HF Tribander Performance..", 1998. And I have found it to b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00602.html (9,582 bytes)

72. [TowerTalk] U.S. Tower Raising Fixtures MAF-XXX (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 20:17:11 -1000
Hi, Follow this link to lots of photos of the installation of an MA-550 with base and all: http://www.karc.net/Activities/Photokh7m.htm Note that you MUST strap the ladder to the tower up near the t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00703.html (7,908 bytes)

73. [TowerTalk] New book announcements (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 08:20:42 -1000
I suspect part of the doubt by some stems from the coverage given in the past to the "crossed field antennas" . Not sure what has ever come of this device; a few were installed in Egypt; planned else
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00300.html (9,129 bytes)

74. [TowerTalk] New book announcements (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:43:48 -1000
Aloha Jack, Thanks much for the link to your columns about the CFA status. Pretty much still stuck in limbo, I guess. Weird! Yes, it would be nice IF a very small and very efficient antenna for lower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00306.html (8,381 bytes)

75. [TowerTalk] homebrew 20m ground mouted vertical... good idea?? (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 13:53:16 -1000
Some one suggested: You will be dissapointed!! The E-field lines at the ends of the resonant elevated radials will couple strongly to earth at such a low height! The result will be that both xmit'd a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00365.html (10,592 bytes)

76. [TowerTalk] 80M dipoles/height gain (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 18:34:18 -1000
This series of information has been one of the great benefits of this reflector. Praise to those who are participating. Just wish I had the QTH to allow some of this info to become applied, hi. Have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00445.html (8,100 bytes)

77. [TowerTalk] Awesome HF Array Spotted (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 16:51:15 -1000
The LP on top is certainly for lower frequencies. Appears the two lower ones are to be, possibly, "ganged". 73, Jim KH7M -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00584.html (7,085 bytes)

78. Re: [TowerTalk] Best Tuner Value? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:44:07 -1000
Yes, that is the tuner I use daily. Not sure it is sold any more however. I think its' cost to build was just too high which resulted in a $1k or so selling price. However, I don't use it for twin l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00618.html (8,545 bytes)

79. Re: [TowerTalk] Best Tuner Value? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:37:20 -1000
My adaptation/realization of L.B.Cebik's (W4RNL) optimization of Link-Coupled Antenna Tuners, see: 1. Five part tutorial, http://www.cebik.com/link/link0.html 2. Updated discussion of one recently a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00622.html (11,160 bytes)

80. [TowerTalk] N4XM's X Match Tuner Info (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:29:03 -1000
Hi, I have had one of these tuners for a few years now. Have not used it much at all, as I no longer have antennas suitable for 160 meters; now using my modified kW Matchbox to my doublet for 80 and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00085.html (11,086 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu