Mail Archive Search: <+from:jimr.reid@verizon.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:jimr.reid@verizon.net: 87 ]

Total 87 documents matching your query.

81. [TowerTalk] Force 12 and the Earthquake (score: 1): Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:00:21 -1000; Guess we will learn in time the situation at the Force 12 facility in Paso Robles, CA. Two reported dead so far in collapsed building, etc. in that town. Damage at wineries also in the area. Must jus; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00693.html (7,033 bytes)
82. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Tuners and Matchers (score: 1): Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:36:22 -1000; Nearly always, the "best" setting using the typical T tuner is that either the input or output C is set to the maximum capacitance, and the inductance set to the least possible value. If the impedan; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00281.html (9,476 bytes)
83. Re: [TowerTalk] 4-Square Radials (Buried or Elevated) (score: 1): Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:34:11 -1000; Gord, VE6SV, wondered: Nope, not at all in a usual installation. Why? Because the elevated radials are supposed to be resonant, or nearly so. This means they have very high electrical field strength; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00208.html (8,917 bytes)
84. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials, elevated, or otherwise (score: 1): Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:25:13 -1000; Hi, ref questions about elevated dipoles: Here is an excellent photo of exactly the sort of antenna you describe: http://www.boulder.nist.gov/timefreq/images/radiostations/ wwvh-large/wwvh5.jpg _____; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00221.html (8,396 bytes)
85. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials, elevated, or otherwise (score: 1): Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:37:50 -1000; Hi, ref questions about elevated dipoles: Here is an excellent photo of exactly the sort of antenna you describe: http://www.boulder.nist.gov/timefreq/images/radiostations/ wwvh-large/wwvh5.jpg you m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00222.html (9,987 bytes)
86. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials, elevated, or otherwise (score: 1): Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:49:13 -1000; Ref: my post which contained this photo link: Clicking just on the highlighted line above takes you to a page with a long list of photos. Look down the list and click on: wwvh-large This brings up an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00223.html (8,432 bytes)
87. Re: [TowerTalk] 9913; Rotor loops (score: 1): Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:59:03 -1000; Same here, except I have LMR-600 up my crank up (US Tower MA-550), the entire tower rotates from the base up. Been in use a few years now, no problems. Cable hangs free from the top tie point. Could; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00544.html (7,749 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 87
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]