Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jjreisert@alum.mit.edu: 941 ]

Total 941 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] DX Telnet Spotting Network (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 00:01:09 -0500
At 03:04 PM 1/17/2004, TNeill1648@aol.com wrote: With the DX Telnet network on the Internet intended for DX spotting, why do we get so much domestic clutter from stateside stations spotting other sta
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00258.html (8,956 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] contesting tips (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:35:26 -0500
At 12:25 PM 1/30/2004, Hanlon, Steve wrote: recently i was reading some tips about working different bands. one of the more notable concerned the correct way to search a band. conventional wisdom is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00516.html (9,996 bytes)

43. [CQ-Contest] Jim White, K4OJ, SK (from ARRL Letter) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 08:09:23 -0500
** The ARRL Letter Vol. 23, No. 07 February 13, 2004 ** The Amateur Radio contesting community is mourning the death of James A. "Jim" White, K4OJ, (ex-K1ZX and ex-WA1NNC), of Seffner, Florida. The w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00298.html (12,520 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] K4OJ's last post? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 19:07:41 -0500
At 11:31 PM 2/13/2004, Eugene Walsh N2AA wrote: In this archive, on 4 February 04, is a post which is "CLASSIC OJ"! And the URL is... http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00304.html (8,053 bytes)

45. [CQ-Contest] Lost leading 'dit' (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:13:40 -0800 (PST)
More so than in the past, I seemed to hear a lot of missing leading dits this weekend, i.e. AD1C came out as TD1C. * Was my break-in delay set too slow? * Are more stations forgetting to key their am
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00402.html (8,762 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] Lost leading 'dit' (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 11:08:04 -0800 (PST)
One obvious point I forgot to mention was that I was *NOT* using an amplifier. So the PTT delay is a non-issue for me. - Jim == Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 USA +9
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00407.html (9,209 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] pwr info (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:18:58 -0500
At 11:57 AM 2/23/2004, K3FT wrote: There was ONE station that was sending an incremented contact serial number in the 'POWER' spot in the exchange. I listened to him for a couple mins and noted that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00413.html (9,815 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Cheating (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:58:29 -0500
At 11:07 AM 2/25/2004, Bill Turner wrote: I've never understood what packet adds to the contest experience. I used packet once or twice back in the nineties and have never used it since. Wouldn't it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00453.html (10,292 bytes)

49. [CQ-Contest] N0AX is 2003 Orr Technical Writing Award winner (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 08:42:26 -0500
** The ARRL Letter Vol. 23, No. 09 February 27, 2004 ** The ARRL Foundation has bestowed the 2003 Bill Orr, W6SAI, Technical Writing Award on QST Contributing Editor H. Ward Silver, N0AX, of Vashon I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00506.html (11,760 bytes)

50. [WriteLog] Re: CTY files release 2 March 2004 (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 23:23:00 -0500
The WL_CTY.DAT file was broken (thanks to Dick WC1M for noticing it). You can download cty-1401.zip or WL_CTY.DAT from the web page again. The file parameters are: 3/02/2004 23:16 41,422 wl_cty.dat S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00024.html (8,986 bytes)

51. [WriteLog] Re: CTY files release 2 March 2004 (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 07:01:40 -0500
Yesterday was not my day. * The link from CTY.ZIP to the latest file was still pointing to the OLD file. Make sure you get CTY-1401.ZIP when you download CTY.ZIP. * WL_CTY.DAT was broken, thanks to D
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00025.html (9,332 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Phone - 40 m lack of bandplan compliance (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 12:21:20 -0800 (PST)
Hi Rag, Until 40 meters is "fixed" in 2009, this will continue to be a problem. There is a simple solution: until Europeans STOP answering us when we listen below 7.040, we will continue to do so. If
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00085.html (9,617 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] saving us from ourselves (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:10:23 -0800 (PST)
Know your radio inside and out. Look at the TRANSMIT light every time you go key-down and see where you're transmitting. My personal pet peeve is DX spots that don't spot a QSX frequency properly (o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00094.html (10,529 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2004 ARRL DX CW M/2 Shootout (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:28:52 -0500
At 10:49 PM 3/4/2004, Ellen White, W1YL wrote: Just want all of you to know that K4OJ arranged for the superb conditions. And you know Jim preferred CW because of the "wonderful" conditions during th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00100.html (8,862 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deading dits chomped off (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:31:48 -0500
At 08:13 PM 3/7/2004, Tree wrote: The problem of chopping off leading dits has always been one of my personal hot buttons. Does anyone on the 'net know if the IC-781 asserts PTT before any RF comes o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00101.html (9,331 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Phone - 40 m lack of bandplan compliance (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:58:26 -0800 (PST)
And we who listened only below 7.050 (at least when Bruce was tuning around) paid the price. KC1XX did not work ZF2 on 40 meters during the contest. 73 - Jim AD1C == Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00127.html (10,100 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] rfi-proof telephone (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 08:01:33 -0500
At 01:44 PM 3/12/2004, Andrew Faber wrote: Does anyone have a current recommendation for an rfi-proof telephone that I could buy to use for telephone interference testing? Radio Shack was supposed to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00243.html (9,173 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to K5ZD's comments (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:21:47 -0800 (PST)
I find it interesting, in light of N6AA's golf anology, how these discussions gain the most strength when the sunspots are waning. It seems to me that when conditions are good and multiple bands are
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00314.html (10,260 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] DX Sprint is a good idea (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 19:33:01 -0500
At 08:32 PM 3/18/2004, Paul D. Schrader wrote: 1) One idea is for all East coast stations to point their beams 180 degrees from normal when working Europe. Normal for all other directions. And the QR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00549.html (10,707 bytes)

60. RE: Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 12:38:41 -0800 (PST)
Barry, this is an extreme view of packet. Operators who use packet (SOA[U] and Multi-ops) have learned how to time WHEN to head for a spot. Remember, your run frequency is at stake. Once you get ther
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00019.html (10,755 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu