Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jlangdon@outer.net: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Tue Dec 28 10:14:17 1999
I have previously tried some of the old DTMF based systems via UHF links and found them very frustrating for DXing and impossible for contesting. I also did some work with a TS870 using the RCP progr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00260.html (8,489 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs. SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "John Langdon" <jlangdon@outer.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:04:06 -0500
How about separate classes for those with supportive spouses (make meals, cover the telephone, let dogs in and out, etc.), versus neutral spouses (leave for the contest weekend) versus unsupportive s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00593.html (10,249 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Remote Contesting is not an advantage (score: 1)
Author: "John Langdon" <jlangdon@outer.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 05:07:42 -0500
The folks who argue for a separate category or for banning remote stations make an assumption that should be examined more carefully: that remote operation, like SO2R, is an advantage. It usually is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00678.html (10,722 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Amazing crank-up at Dayton Hamvention (score: 1)
Author: "John Langdon" <jlangdon@outer.net>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 07:49:40 -0500
It's been advertised in QST for last several months Luso www.luso.us 73 John N5CQ --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00145.html (10,823 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] QZB (Suggestion) (score: 1)
Author: "John Langdon" <jlangdon@outer.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:40:55 -0600
I noticed the same thing, but thought my receiver (TS-480) front end just couldn't handle the very strong signals on 20 and 40. It resulted in people calling longer and longer until somebody was reco
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00240.html (9,717 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: "John Langdon" <jlangdon@outer.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 08:04:57 -0600
Perhaps we should also ban logging software as " something other than amateur radio contesting"? 73 John N5CQ Paul, As long as all his transmitters, receivers, and antenna are inside the 500-meter ci
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00347.html (12,168 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Windmill generators (score: 1)
Author: "John Langdon" <jlangdon@outer.net>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 07:19:43 -0500
Paul, Electrically, the chance for noise is most likely from the lines serving them, and is about the same as any other line, except they are often underground, so less of a problem. At that distance
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-05/msg00153.html (8,843 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Aniother rules/remote RX issue (score: 1)
Author: "John Langdon" <jlangdon@outer.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 06:20:27 -0500
Should we have a separate category for ops with very supportive spouses who provide meals at planned breaks, answer all the phone calls, and do all the chores around the house on the contest weekend
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00042.html (44,360 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] W7RM SS CW Operation on LiveATC (score: 1)
Author: "John Langdon" <jlangdon@outer.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 18:50:19 -0600
Certainly not so if you use wireless links in the ham bands, like K6VVA does for example. Ergo his QSO's are valid, by your lights. What about people that use a public utility for electrical power? A
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00052.html (8,898 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote contest operation (score: 1)
Author: "John Langdon" <jlangdon@outer.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:46:15 -0500
I thought ignorance was supposed to be bliss! 73 John N5CQ Over the last few days, this thread has included the terms listed below. I don't recognise amateur radio contesting in any of them. Most are
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00250.html (10,216 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] WARC bands and contesting. (score: 1)
Author: "John Langdon" <jlangdon@outer.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 14:01:43 -0500
The 30, 17, and 12M bands are so narrow that a contest would obliterate all other users. But lots of ops chase DXCC on the WARC bands, and activity is not all that low when conditions are good. 73 Jo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-08/msg00021.html (10,188 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu