Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jlangdon@outer.net: 97 ]

Total 97 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] $/db (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 13:56:05 -0500
No discussion would be complete without reviewing the old "Station Design for DX" series in QST by Rockwell. This was great stuff, complete with graphs of marginal cost of the next dB. His rules of t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00313.html (10,815 bytes)

22. [TowerTalk] Grounding photo link and ? (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 21:13:11 -0500
Forget all the wire options - even the biggest wire is not as good as the strap. I would use some sort of compression clamp to compress the strap against on of the flat surfaces of the tower leg wher
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00439.html (8,848 bytes)

23. [TowerTalk] Stealth Paint (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 20:12:16 -0500
There is a power substation on a hill not far from N3BB's place that is surprisingly well camouflaged by the technique of painting the top half of all the structures at the installation sky blue and
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00579.html (7,948 bytes)

24. [TowerTalk] Phasing Harness problem (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 16:17:35 -0400
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0002_01BED6B9.34E26A60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit If you have tested the feedline to
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00434.html (11,078 bytes)

25. [TowerTalk] Alternatives to Phillystran? (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 06:37:36 -0400
Also look at the Towertalk reflector archives http://www.contesting.com/_towertalk/ for K5NA's cost anaylsis of the rod, which Richard is currently using. 73 John N5CQ -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.conte
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00471.html (7,409 bytes)

26. [TowerTalk] US Tower HDX-572MDL (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 19:55:23 -0500
IMHO: 1) I think they all run on 220, probably 20 amp should be okay. I bet local code will tell you what to run for an electric dryer, and that should be close enough. 2) Follow local codes for the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00195.html (9,621 bytes)

27. [TowerTalk] Connecting Tower GND to Service GND (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 20:00:02 -0500
75 feet is practically complete separation as far as lightning protection is concerned. I would not tie the two grounds together at all. If you wanted to connect them, even 00 would not be as good as
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00196.html (8,534 bytes)

28. [TowerTalk] leveling tower (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 06:30:52 -0500
I have never had much luck with a plumb bob, even without wind problems, which we usually have here. If you want to do it right, rent two transits and set them up 90 degrees from each other at equal
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00203.html (9,062 bytes)

29. [TowerTalk] Antenna Measurements (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 11:04:47 -0500
Amen about reviewers, Tom. When you are the manufacturer or author, it sometimes seems as though the reviewers are Murphy's disciples on earth. They are able to generate a minimum of 17 different exp
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00212.html (11,385 bytes)

30. Recall: [TowerTalk] Mosley ad (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 11:09:21 -0500
John Langdon would like to recall the message, "[TowerTalk] Mosley ad". -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00269.html (6,547 bytes)

31. [TowerTalk] Mosley ad (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 11:08:48 -0500
I just read the Mosley ad again after setting it aside for a few days. If there were licenses for marketers like physicians, who ever cooked up this baby would be looking for a malpractice lawyer! Fi
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00270.html (8,633 bytes)

32. [TowerTalk] Mosley ad (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 11:50:20 -0500
I just read the Mosley ad again after setting it aside for a few days. If there were licenses for marketers like physicians, who ever cooked up this baby might be looking for a marketing malpractice
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00271.html (11,302 bytes)

33. [TowerTalk] RE: Here's a way to move that big tower to a better location... (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:14:28 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_000A_01BEBF15.0960A660 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Take a look at http://www.widomaker
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00310.html (13,662 bytes)

34. [TowerTalk] Tower proximity alarms (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 07:04:39 -0500
I remember reading about a system that was designed for accident prevention as a primary goal and liability reduction as a secondary goal. I think it was installed on pools that were used for some ma
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00187.html (8,986 bytes)

35. [TowerTalk] Hy-Gain, responsibility shifted (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 15:50:43 -0500
Triex, not Telex and forget Telrex! 73 John N5CQ -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00242.html (8,700 bytes)

36. [TowerTalk] EF140 up Cushcraft A4S (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 12:04:30 -0500
I have C4XL's with the roughly the same 40M elements as the EF140. At five feet you will see interaction with anything you put there, whatever orientation. Eight feet would be pushing it. I seen to r
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00399.html (7,448 bytes)

37. [TowerTalk] Easyway tower (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 16:39:02 -0500
I used an RBX 50 with the finned base also many years ago in South Texas. It was clay soil, but my PE consultant at the time (Jim Naismith) said to fill the hole with packed fine sand and it would be
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00401.html (8,524 bytes)

38. [TowerTalk] Antenna Switch Cabinet (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 16:42:28 -0500
See also www.sescom.com for boxes with panels available pre cut for DB9 and DB25. 73 John N5CQ more These boxes are cheaper than buying a blank Bud box and they already have the DB connector holes in
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00519.html (8,362 bytes)

39. [TowerTalk] Best Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 05:45:53 -0500
It doesn't need radials, buried or otherwise, and it's short enough to hide behind most privacy fences, too. In a restrictive covenants situation, I expect you could construct arrays of these things
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00617.html (8,317 bytes)

40. [TowerTalk] 40m Yagi @ 66' vs 92' (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 07:02:49 -0600
I have 2 element "shorty" 40M yagis at 65, 125, and 195' with a WX0B StackMatch to switch them. Of course, this is from W5 land. The lower antenna is better in the afternoon before sunset for listeni
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00070.html (8,352 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu