Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jmaass@columbus.rr.com: 148 ]

Total 148 documents matching your query.

121. [CQ-Contest] Re: Which is Best SO2R Box? (score: 1)
Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (Jeff Maass)
Date: Mon Apr 30 09:10:00 2001
I posted this request for comments late last week, and will post a summary of the responses later this week. If you have comments on the Array Solutions/WX0B "SO2R Master" or TopTen "DX Doubler" SO2R
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-04/msg00209.html (8,087 bytes)

122. [CQ-Contest] Band-pass filters -- insertion loss (score: 1)
Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (Jeff Maass)
Date: Thu May 3 19:29:30 2001
Array Solutions BPF6 specifies <0.4 dB insertion loss in-band for each of the six bands. The specs are at: http://www.arraysolutions.com/Products/wx0bbpf6.htm 73, Jeff Maass jmaass@columbus.rr.com Lo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00052.html (9,822 bytes)

123. [CQ-Contest] (SUMMARY) RE: Which is Best SO2R Box? (score: 1)
Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (Jeff Maass)
Date: Sun May 13 20:40:37 2001
THE ORIGINAL QUERY: "I'm looking at SO2R boxes, and there appear to be two available. I'd like to get the opinions of experienced SO2R operators as to which has the better mix of features." Top Ten '
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00142.html (15,716 bytes)

124. [CQ-Contest] Don't repeat my STUPID mistake! (score: 1)
Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (Jeff Maass)
Date: Wed May 30 14:25:32 2001
PCs keep lousy time, and I finally got fed up. Now I use a program that keeps my PC clock synchronized to the proper time via SNTP on the internet. Since I have a cable modem, I have it configured to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00311.html (10,410 bytes)

125. [CQ-Contest] SO2R radio positioning (score: 1)
Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (Jeff Maass)
Date: Mon Jun 25 10:50:43 2001
Why put the second-band radio on top? That's the one you'll be adjusting all the time (tuning across bnd, etc.), and so it needs to be in the most comfortable position for your arm. The run radio wi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-06/msg00178.html (8,508 bytes)

126. [CQ-Contest] Best QSOs per Hour on SSB and CW (score: 1)
Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (Jeff Maass)
Date: Thu Jun 28 22:35:40 2001
Bob Hayes, KW8N, pointed out at a recent MRRC meeting that it was actually easier to make high rates on paper than it is using the computer. On paper, you can put multiple calls or parts of calls fr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-06/msg00281.html (8,692 bytes)

127. [CQ-Contest] 'bogus' check (score: 1)
Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (Jeff Maass)
Date: Sat Apr 27 11:07:10 2002
I guess I'm going against the Majority on this one. Could I have been to be the only one to have read the rules in modern memory? The rules specify what to send for *check* in the same way it does fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00431.html (10,582 bytes)

128. [CQ-Contest] headphones (score: 1)
Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (Jeff Maass)
Date: Wed May 22 14:56:56 2002
Absolutely! It's important to change positions periodically if you are going to operate for extended sessions! The airlines are seeing cases where people are dying from sitting in a restricted positi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00261.html (10,327 bytes)

129. [CQ-Contest] IARU 2002 Headquarters Stations QRV (score: 1)
Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (Jeff Maass)
Date: Thu Jul 4 14:17:30 2002
The NU5DE QSL card is singularly unsatisfying, but still is an item of interest in this shack! Jeff Maass jmaass@columbus.rr.com Located near Columbus Ohio USPSA # L-1192 NROI/CRO Amateur Radio K8ND
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00047.html (8,411 bytes)

130. [CQ-Contest] NU5DE and Operating Style (score: 1)
Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (Jeff Maass)
Date: Thu Jul 4 14:40:55 2002
All the NU5DE conversation brings to mind the cartoon I found recently. http://home.columbus.rr.com/jmaass/images/CasualFriday.jpg Given that *I* am a telecommuter, and the temperature in my workspac
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00049.html (7,443 bytes)

131. [CQ-Contest] possible error on my part (score: 1)
Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (Jeff Maass)
Date: Tue Jul 23 16:57:14 2002
I'm surprised that the Section News debacle wasn't by voice vote as well. The public service folks (traffic handlers, ARES types, etc.) get precious little recognition as it is, and many were driven
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00361.html (9,793 bytes)

132. [CQ-Contest] Why not complain about CQ also? (score: 1)
Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (Jeff Maass)
Date: Wed Jul 24 10:04:42 2002
Perhaps because CQ is not the membership journal of our organization, but simply a business. CQ is not answerable to any of us, but ARRL should be. Jeff Maass jmaass@columbus.rr.com Located near Col
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00387.html (8,180 bytes)

133. [CQ-Contest] Headset Mic vs. Boom Mic (score: 1)
Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (Jeff Maass)
Date: Tue Oct 1 00:16:07 2002
Dog barks, need repeats. Sneeze, need repeats. Phone rings, need repeats. Wife/family bark, need repeats. Clear throat, need repeats. Bump microphone with straw, need repeats. Breath too hard, need
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00004.html (7,719 bytes)

134. Re: [CQ-Contest] Longest Callsign Possible? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:56:43 -0400
Although not strictly responsive: In any given pileup at any given time, the longest callsign is, without fail, that of the LOUDEST and SLOWEST calling station. Jeff K8ND ____________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00167.html (9,323 bytes)

135. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW 2004 Results (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 17:46:53 -0400
G'day Steve: CQ hasn't posted any CQWW CW results newer than 2002 online. http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/cqwwhome.html I hope you can still get the gang on this year! 73, Jeff Maass K8ND Station Man
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00166.html (8,240 bytes)

136. Re: [CQ-Contest] Competing in the Daylight (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:26:30 -0400
That's not been my experience. I can start a CQ from PJ2 (not a very rare spot) and have several callers almost immediately, and a good-sized pile in five minutes, any time of the day or night. Then
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00253.html (10,836 bytes)

137. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB (40M) (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 21:01:15 -0500
DX station need to get out of the US bands to be able to focus on the more multiplier-dense Europe without the additional "noise" of the loud USA stations. USA for rate; everywhere else for multipli
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00059.html (9,889 bytes)

138. Re: [CQ-Contest] Thoughts on 40 SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 05:29:04 -0500
The band plans for *all* Regions explicitly permits CW in the entire 40 meter allocation. There is no issue of violating "...the spirit of the agreement..." even if CW fills the entire band for CQWW
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00113.html (8,990 bytes)

139. Re: [CQ-Contest] Competitor Friendly Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 08:54:08 -0500
I think the best all-around solution is to share the load when it becomes too much for one person alone. When the 48 hours seems too daunting, invite some other operators in, and do a Multi-Op. Make
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00440.html (9,588 bytes)

140. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 160 and DX Window (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 04:04:45 -0500
On 160 meters, when a station has many directional receive antennas, it might be that they actually did not hear you. At K1LT last weekend, Victor had 13 Beverages selectable, and often any given st
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00151.html (11,099 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu