Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jmerrill1@adelphia.net: 413 ]

Total 413 documents matching your query.

261. RE: [TenTec] new filter for omni VI (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:09:55 -0500
What's this new filter? I don't see it on their website. John N1JM I have one of the new filters ordered for my Omni VI+. Does anyone have one of these already installed? If so how do you like it? Pl
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00150.html (7,531 bytes)

262. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter audio (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:24:39 -0500
Is it on all bands? If not it may be a vco/pll problem. I've read of this similar problem before with the Jup and may need a trip to TT. 73, John N1JM East Amherst, NY Hi again, I've moved the power
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00254.html (7,715 bytes)

263. RE: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI+ (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:30:26 -0500
Nathan: Could tell me the serial#? Does it have the original box? I assume it's not an Opt3 upgrade. Thanks and 73, John N1JM East Amherst, NY I have an Omni VI+ with the 500Hz Cw filter and the 250H
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00264.html (7,895 bytes)

264. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 06:34:47 -0500
FWIW,I've had 2 Opt3 pass through me and neither one said OMNIVI Plus on them. 73, John N1JM East Amherst, NY Barry, I said I don't recall all the details, but I'm 100% certain that one of the option
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00305.html (10,182 bytes)

265. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:10:07 -0500
hardi har har Wow! That must have hurt! Did you swallow them whole, or one resistor at a time? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00325.html (9,506 bytes)

266. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI roofing filter JPG (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:44:05 -0500
what's the cost? Here is the completed installation of the INRAD roofing filter. It mounts on the final amp box toward the rear, bottom of the rig. Take a look. Oh, It works too. I noticed no loss of
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00355.html (7,693 bytes)

267. RE: [TenTec] WTB: Omni 6+ (564) (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:13:03 -0500
You've probably got notice by now but money has been sent by PayPal. John N1JM _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00357.html (7,445 bytes)

268. RE: [TenTec] New roofing filter in Omni VI- Opt. 1 (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:23:28 -0500
Bill: I wonder how many do use an offset that low? John N1JM Hz, and works fine with the slightly different offset (600 Hz) of the 753. I suspect that Inrad chose 700 Hz as a compromise offset so tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00384.html (8,837 bytes)

269. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI Inrad roofing filter (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:39:57 -0500
Anyone have any experience with the 400hz roofing filter on RTTY. Will it pass the rtty tones? John N1JM - -- _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00391.html (6,976 bytes)

270. RE: [TenTec] Omni D to Hercules 444 cable (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 06:35:46 -0500
Have you tried Ten Tec? 73, John N1JM East Amherst, NY Does anyone have available the band automation interface cable that was originally supplied with with Hercules 444 linear? It allows auto bandsw
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00424.html (7,927 bytes)

271. RE: [TenTec] Binaural (Stereo) CW Redux! (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:57:21 -0500
you were polite. don't you mean a sales gimmick? HI John N1JM Yep. I turned it on, listened, tuned around, said "ok that's cool", turned it off and never bothered with it again. I don't see the point
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00445.html (9,549 bytes)

272. RE: [TenTec] Binaural (Stereo) CW Redux! (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 13:25:39 -0500
Well, I like it but I guess Steve doesn't. John N1JM as in, next to useless? Barry N1EU __________________________________________________________________ Switch to Netscape Internet Service. As low
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00448.html (11,228 bytes)

273. RE: [TenTec] INRAD Omni VI roofing filter kit - success (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:11:56 -0500
Are u using the 600 or 2800 hz roofing filter? Sounds like u are using the ssb one. 73, John N1JM East Amherst, NY I'm happily enjoying the performance of the INRAD roofing filter kit for the Omni VI
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00465.html (8,643 bytes)

274. RE: [TenTec] WTB: Omni 6+ (564) (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:04:31 -0500
Don: The OmviVI+ arrived, thanks. I didnt see the 705 mic. John N1JM hi i have one, its a nice rig, no issues at all, cosmetics are superb, face is superb, all the filter slots on boith if's are full
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00476.html (8,503 bytes)

275. RE: [TenTec] Airpax Fuses? (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:53:53 -0500
OmniVI+ has current foldback so shouldnt need one. John N1JM I have an Omni VI plus...what does the rig have in it for current limiting?? Thanks.. -- Original Message -- From: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00491.html (9,677 bytes)

276. RE: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Omni's (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 15:38:52 -0500
What's the Omni C inrelation to these? Omni A is an ANALOG display Omni D is a DIGITAL display Omni D series B and series C are upgraded Omni D's. Each version had a different MODEL number. Check the
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00568.html (9,118 bytes)

277. RE: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Omni V / 301 (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 15:43:40 -0500
I'm not either-N1JM Looks like it might be a nice web site, but I'm not getting any of the images. The 301 wiring description is enough without the schematic image anyway. Still I'd like to see his s
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00569.html (8,111 bytes)

278. RE: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Omni's (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 15:53:05 -0500
So the OmniC was not a D series C but came after the D series C? N1JM The Omni C, is a digital only version that added the warc bands and more RIT, XIT options over the series B Omni's. You might cal
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00571.html (10,877 bytes)

279. RE: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Omni's (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:23:07 -0500
Of course then there is the OmniA and OmniA series B. But I think we have all gone through this before.:-). John N1JM This is getting as bad as "who's on first". :) Ron Wb1hga No, the Omni C IS the D
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00578.html (8,747 bytes)

280. Re: [TenTec] FS - Omni VI + Paragon 1 - more info (score: 1)
Author: John L Merrill <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 10:00:39 -0500
Jeff Kelly wrote: 564: Inrad Roofing filter = SSB filter 2.4 Filters Available 9MHZ - 1.8 500 or 250 6mhz - 1.8 500 250 Jeff -- Original Message -- From: "Jeff Kelly" <jkelly@bellatlantic.net> To: <t
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00616.html (9,100 bytes)

Current List: 261 - 280
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu