Mail Archive Search: <+from:jmnason@yahoo.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:jmnason@yahoo.com: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Best Headphones? (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:16:42 -0800 (PST); Powers the electronics that perform the noise cancelling process. Works without battery as ordinary headphones. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.c; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00954.html (8,437 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Orion II - Initial Reactions and Impressions (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:54:57 -0800 (PST); Contesters bad habit. Do they every check the signal reports on contest logs? This was one of the reasons that we always give 599 to guys we can barely hear and had to listen through six transmission; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00959.html (10,489 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] CVS TDE headphones (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:50:07 -0800 (PST); The warning is put on by CVS and uses California standards for lead exposure which are pretty tight. Frankly, it does not bother me but then again I am past child rearing age and madness set in long; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00960.html (10,283 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] CVS TDE headphones (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:32:19 -0800 (PST); I am using a stero to mono jack adapter for my Kenwood. It works FB. John _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00962.html (13,880 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] LW receiver (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:31:05 -0800 (PST); That is almost assuredly an image based around the 450 khz IF or multiples thereof. I am awaiting my Orion II and cannot explain why it is happening specifically but this must have something to do wi; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00017.html (8,162 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 08:03:22 -0800 (PST); The Woodpecker, by golly it's been awhile.... gary.huber@us.army.mil<mailto:gary.huber@us.army.mil> wm@fifthinfantrydivision.com<mailto:wm@fifthinfantrydivision.com> www.societyofthefifthdivision.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00122.html (13,792 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Heaqdphone Redux (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 07:38:29 -0800 (PST); Ken, Did TT commit to send out a delivery date? The last communication I got from them is that it would be around the end of January but the specific date was not given. I assume they have a boatload; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00246.html (7,821 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] O2 shipments (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 13:13:24 -0800 (PST); At least the O2 can transmit which is more than my HR-1680 receiver could do. Can this thread outrun the headphones? 73, John NA9U _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00276.html (9,104 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] TT SDR Net New Time (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:28:37 -0800 (PST); There were a bunch of guys on 7.2535 that were all wrapped around the axle about the TT SDR net this afternoon (1/8/06). They claimed that they were there first and had been there since 11:00 AM. I h; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00341.html (9,431 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Web Site Down (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:52:34 -0800 (PST); The website being down is irritating. I don't think it is an expression of their software skills but I understand why the statement was made. They should find a different ISP or fix the problem, it i; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00813.html (8,232 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] LDG tuner install/first impressions (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:30:57 -0800 (PST); The internal tuner is fast and just too convenient to use. At first I was disappointed that it does not have memories but at this point is seems irrelevant and based on comments I have read possibly; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00622.html (9,904 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Help with New Orion II (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:35:42 -0800 (PST); You may know this but look at the boxes on the main reciever made with red and yellow lines. The red lines are the roofers and the yellow is the DSP bandwidth. Did the red line show the roofer activa; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00624.html (10,051 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and Audio Peak Filter (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:44:18 -0800 (PST); I too tried my old Autek QF-1A on the Orion II. It was mandatory on my old Kenwood. However it did not seem to really help with the Orion. I do feel some audio filtering would help but I am hesistant; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00823.html (9,599 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] QST AD (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:27:32 -0800 (PST); I think the review is one piece of information. The test data is another and the expanded review is the best if there is one for a rig. The testing is standard and you can't gloss over that. Some mar; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01016.html (11,069 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Another Possible O-II Issue (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 08:49:04 -0800 (PST); I have reproduced Grant's observation as well. I am a bit tone deaf so these things are harder for me to recognize (maybe that is good). But because of that it does not bother me that much. Let's see; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01180.html (9,322 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] MY_ORION&O2_RF_IN_MIC-PROBLEM_SOLVED!! (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 08:53:52 -0800 (PST); I had a similar problem with my Bose headphones (bought new when the Orion 2 came). Very bad distortion, while transmitting, in the headphones on all bands above 10m. No problems when listening on th; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00042.html (13,423 bytes)
17. [TenTec] Another O2 bug (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 12:30:52 -0700 (PDT); Here is another bug if anyone can confirm. I use the TT 706A microphone, I would be interested in knowing if other mikes do this: 1) Put the rig and the microphone on VOX while on USB or LSB. Make su; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00101.html (9,151 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Problem: Please confirm Orion II Radios (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 17:11:48 -0700 (PDT); Did you have to turn the airplane off and then back on in mid-flight like we have to sometimes?:) 73, John NA9U _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.c; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00107.html (12,926 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] The Bug (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 16:41:25 -0700 (PDT); Why not buy a commercial quality broadcast transmitter? It only works on one frequency and you'll need to rig it to reduce the power but just think about the audio. For about $75,000 there would be n; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00201.html (8,879 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] 40 Meter QRM (score: 1): Author: John Nason <jmnason@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 06:50:56 -0700 (PDT); I do not hear this at all, very quiet on the lower part of 40 hear in Chicago and I use a vertical. Could it be the North Koreans up to some skulduggery? 73, John NA9U _______________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00676.html (8,922 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]