Mail Archive Search: <+from:johngeig@yahoo.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:johngeig@yahoo.com: 113 ]

Total 113 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet is the root of all evil but... (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 08:50:25 -0800 (PST); A Multi station could have "listening posts" And since the Omni VII does 6 meters, you could be your own captive rover for VHF contests! 73s John W5TD ________________________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00155.html (7,867 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Omni V vs. TS850 (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:30:07 -0800 (PST); I may be in the market soon for an older (1990s) contest quality rig, and wonder how the Kenwood TS850 compares to the Ten Tec Omni V overall. Anyone have a chance to compare these 2? The QST review; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00321.html (7,418 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] contesting 10 years from now (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 13:23:46 -0800 (PST); It would also be great if you could select the solar flux, K index,etc to see how those things affect propagation at different locations. Dr. DX did offer a DXCC certificate,among other things. 73s J; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00037.html (10,844 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] contesting 10 years from now (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:23:30 -0800 (PST); But what is the fun of going on a DXpedition if you can't get shot at or nearly freeze to death? 73s John W5TD http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest ________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00030.html (10,286 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] contesting 10 years from now (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:20:01 -0800 (PST); Not sure why, when participation in most contests is at an all time high, and getting a general or extra license has never been easier. 73s John W5TD _________________________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00029.html (9,263 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] contesting 10 years from now (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:05:04 -0800 (PST); 1. There will be more SO2R in one box radios along the lines of the Yaesu FTDX9000, and the cost for them will come down into the $3000 or $4000 range. Maybe in the Icom 756PROIV or 756PROV. 2. There; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00028.html (12,216 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] contesting 10 years from now (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 05:53:17 -0800 (PST); Wasn't a program like this developed and marketed about 20 years ago by AEA? Can't remember the name of it right now, but it simulated the CQWW CW contest and ran on Commodore computers. 73s john W5T; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00009.html (9,429 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] the trouble it would be to use a different nameeach time (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:57:36 -0800 (PST); So since there is nothing to send for everyone's first QSO, the contest never really got going. 73s john W5TD ____________________________________________________________________________________ TV d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00305.html (8,794 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:39:01 -0800 (PST); So instead of sending a consectutive serial number, which can take more time in sending, would it be ok for me to give everyone 100 as a serial number, cut to ATT? As long as I log that as the sent n; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00294.html (10,033 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:36:29 -0800 (PST); As I stated before, the RST is purely subjective. R of 5 means perfectly reabable, whatever that means. And S9 means "extremely strong signals", but compared to what? There is no standard for strong; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00287.html (10,474 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:25:06 -0800 (PST); Then why not state in the rules: Check (the last two digits made up at random) It seems pretty straightforward what the check is. I cannot see why some people are so resistant to sending the correct; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00285.html (9,949 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:55:55 -0800 (PST); But remember that the 59 (or the RST system in general) isn't stated as being relative to anything. Compared to the radio signals coming from Pioneer 10 (which is still sending) all terrestrial signa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00283.html (10,639 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:25:39 -0800 (PST); From now on, the check Then you are in violation of the rules and should be moved to the checklog or disqualified category. The rules specifically state: 4. Exchange: The required exchange consists o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00275.html (9,017 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 07:40:12 -0800 (PST); And I had one station say that he copied my call incorrectly, even though he said it correctly, because the name and state I gave him didn't match what he had in the files, as he had the info for the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00242.html (9,297 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet has ruined Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:32:07 -0800 (PST); Don't the rules say something about both callsigns being sent and received for it to be a valid QSO? 73s John W5TD Packet hater #1 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest ____________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00598.html (9,631 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Shorter Time to Submit Log (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:49:09 -0800 (PST); Steve, You took the words right out of my mouth. Before clusters showed up, there was no assisted category, and no one worried if you called a directional CQ or not. Lets get back to the obvious-"ass; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00322.html (8,969 bytes)
17. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX contest and assisted rule (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 07:55:35 -0800 (PST); Here is another issue related to the "assisted vs non-assisted" rules for different contests. In the ARRL DX contests coming up next year, I am thinking of entering as a single band entry: 15 meters,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00237.html (7,636 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Enforceable rules (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 16:53:15 -0800 (PST); Again, if they have decided that the check is meaningless, then why state what it is in the rules? Why not state "send any 2 digit number?" It never says "send an honest signal report" just "signal r; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00222.html (12,676 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Enforceable rules (Was Random acts of viole... er,kindness) (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 20:56:38 -0800 (PST); And what about publicly (more or less) stating that you won't enfore certain rules. For example, to go back to a topic that was discussed before-the SS rules say the check is the last 2 digits of the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00168.html (12,648 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check in SS (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 15:22:17 -0800 (PST); Then why keep it in the exchange? http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest ____________________________________________________________________________________ Want to start your own b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00365.html (9,259 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]