Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:johngeig@yahoo.com: 113 ]

Total 113 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 11:19:02 -0800 (PST)
How about in VHF contesting, where rovers post their route ahead of time? Or getting on the local repeater announcing your rover route? Or announcing at the club meeting or club saturday breakfast th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00364.html (12,177 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 11:21:36 -0800 (PST)
So then any casual QSOs I make before the SS starts, even if they aren't to hold a frequency, must be added to my 24 hour limit? Wouldn't that also limit me to what bands I operate on? If I make a QS
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00365.html (11,193 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: [YCCC] Re: SS-CW Tricks et al. (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:43:14 -0800 (PST)
And it is too bad that the contest results articles in CQ and QST do very little for this. They basically rehash the line scores in a textual format. I think new contesters would like to read about c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00484.html (11,054 bytes)

24. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:09:19 -0800 (PST)
In 2001 I moved from Iowa to Oklahoma and ran both the CW and SSB sweepstakes from here. It was interesting to see in the ARRL log checking report that several stations lost a QSO with me because the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00568.html (10,969 bytes)

25. [CQ-Contest] Another SS rules question (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 21:42:14 -0800 (PST)
Here is another hypothetical, but definitely possible, rules interpretation question. Suppose I live in a section that has few SS entries, and run barefoot at 100 watts. Now I know that there are a c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00618.html (8,030 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:39:39 -0800 (PST)
And does the year you were first licensed refer to any amateur license, or the year you received your first US license? 73s John NE0P http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest http://li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00709.html (14,879 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 12:39:25 -0800 (PST)
Actually, you can also sign your callsign by itelf from any US possession. However, the contest rules say that you must sign /whatever DXCC country you are in, so the contest rules do supercede the F
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00715.html (14,465 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Chiming in -- SO2R (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 06:46:30 -0800 (PST)
And how would this limited WRTC type category account for propagation differences, as the true WRTC does? Anyone who lives in the 9/0/5 black hole can tell you that propagation is everything. 73s Joh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00006.html (10,914 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 07:21:06 -0800 (PST)
Can't you also do that with a FT1000D? That would make you SO1R even though you are doing SO2R work. 73s John NE0P _________________________________________________________ http://lists.contesting.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00078.html (9,532 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:41:01 -0800 (PST)
SO why are Field Day line scores still published? They probably make up more pages than all the other contests combined. 73s JOhn NE0P (http://www.designet.com/k1ir/Downloads/ContestProposal_071702.p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00090.html (11,997 bytes)

31. RE: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:47:56 -0800 (PST)
True, but if they had their way CW testing and CW subbands wouldn't be. John NE0P http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Meet the al
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00092.html (10,390 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:04:46 -0800 (PST)
But it is a contest. It has the same goals as a contest, and has contest-type rules. Also, couldn't these technically saavy people find the FD scores on line as well? I wonder if "Up Front in QST" co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00098.html (15,177 bytes)

33. Re: RE: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:28:35 -0800 (PST)
But is that really the future? The shack on a belt walkthon type person could care less about BPL, because it won't affect them, but that is one of the ARRL's biggest focuses right now. Contest activ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00103.html (10,627 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Physical conditioning and contesting. (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:18:26 -0800 (PST)
But most of the ones who need the most improvement are probably not contesters, and probably not even on HF, if the clubs I have belonged to are any indication. 73s JOhn NE0P ________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00120.html (8,737 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Line Scores (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 16:11:24 -0800 (PST)
The problem is, what are you going to threated the manufactures with? Never again buy their product? They know better than that. Who else are you going to buy a contest quality radio from? it isn't s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00137.html (9,841 bytes)

36. [CQ-Contest] SO2R on the same band (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 18:04:26 -0800 (PST)
Is there any sort of device that will allow you to hook up 2 radios to do dual receive on the same band? I know that is simple enough, but the big problem would be to mute the one receiver when you t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00142.html (8,147 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ Contests - Five Not Four (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:32:19 -0800 (PST)
There is actually 9: CQWW CW CQWW SSB CQWW RTTY CQWPX CW CQWPX SSB CQWPX RTTY 160 CW 160 SSB CQVHF 73s John NE0P http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest ______________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00148.html (8,186 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 21:55:55 -0800 (PST)
Hi Bob, I assume you find this mostly on 20 meters. Have you tried running more on 15 and 10 meters, at least during the day and early evening when they are open? I have done a few contests recently
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00151.html (12,784 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: Line Scores (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 05:45:53 -0800 (PST)
And when the scores are printed in QST, a non-contester (probably new ham) may accidently stumble across the article and scores while paging through the magazine. They may even see some familar calls
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00166.html (13,096 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: Line Scores (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 07:30:22 -0800 (PST)
And obviously the ARRL realizes that line scores are important to see in print, or they wouldn't print them for Field Day, whether or not it is a contest or operating event (and I think the rules are
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00182.html (10,212 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu