Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jreid@aloha.net: 281 ]

Total 281 documents matching your query.

141. [TowerTalk] Fw: devil's advocate hi hi-coax vs. twin libe (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 09:17:22 -1000
Hi all, Rcv'd this, this morning. Some interesting points re the discussion coax vs. twin line for amateur HF use. I suppose "open-wire" ladder line is what is being criticized below. Open wire line,
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00394.html (8,774 bytes)

142. [TowerTalk] MFJ259 VS MFJ259B (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 11:31:14 -1000
Hi Reid, (Wonder if we are far separated relatives, hi), The B is a completely different unit, even looks different. Has three buttons on the front, a red one for power, and two others labeled Gate a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00402.html (7,692 bytes)

143. [TowerTalk] Re: [Antennas] 377 ohms? (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 18:29:19 -1000
Aloha, And, thanks to all who have responded to my question. I now understand that the ratio of E to H in space has NOTHING to do with antenna design or use! However, I am glad I asked the question.
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00412.html (7,322 bytes)

144. [TowerTalk] MFJ259B: Vers. 6F0 vs. 6F1 ? (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 07:39:31 -1000
Hi all, Well, here I have been having a great time measuring all sorts of things with my new 259B; had it about 3 weeks now. Yesterday, I read a post that one should absolutely insure that your new 2
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00451.html (8,609 bytes)

145. [TowerTalk] MFJ259B: Vers. 6F0 vs. 6F1 ? (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 08:38:54 -1000
Mine does not. Hi Dick, Setting the 259B to a precise frequency is just about NOT possible! Even on 40 meters, just a touch of the tuning knob, and the frequency deltas several kHz; and on the higher
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00454.html (9,598 bytes)

146. [TowerTalk] MFJ259B Tuning Gear (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 09:27:42 -1000
I responded in error to Dick in the following: Obviously there has to be a gear drive in this unit; it requires several turns of the tuning knob to cover one of the frequency band selection ranges, b
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00456.html (7,329 bytes)

147. [TowerTalk] MFJ259B: Vers. 6F0 vs. 6F1 ? (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 19:59:06 -1000
- Yes, but I bought my new 259B three weeks ago; did the 6F1 come out a week ago? So far NO answers from anyone, including MFJ who I have also queried. 73, Jim, KH7M -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contest
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00470.html (8,280 bytes)

148. [TowerTalk] MFJ259B: Vers. 6F0 vs. 6F1 ? (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 20:07:12 -1000
--Original Message-- From: Robert Wood <w5robert@blkbox.com> To: Jim Reid <jreid@aloha.net> Cc: towertalk@contesting.com <towertalk@contesting.com> To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Date: Wednesday, Jul
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00471.html (9,084 bytes)

149. [TowerTalk] Steve's antenna study (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 08:45:21 -1000
steve wrote... <big snip> this shouldn't be a surprise. but it sure bears repeating! Yes, George, What gives an antenna gain has NOTHING to do with the impedance of the antenna. The impedance relativ
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00629.html (9,359 bytes)

150. [TowerTalk] Steve's antenna study (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 12:06:39 -1000
Hi all, in response to the following: I write: Yes, the antenna's impedance is a "fall out" from the geometry which produces the azimuth pattern. we look at the pattern and make judgments about the a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00647.html (10,234 bytes)

151. [TowerTalk] Steve Best on Mismatch loss, transmitters and tuners (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 10:41:02 -1000
Me to: I have to join into this discussion, miss-concepts must be refuted: Above OK. Steve goes on: KH7M comment: No, the power is re-reflected back from the antenna, no more power exits the antenna
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00699.html (16,017 bytes)

152. [TowerTalk] Ward and Steve's Tribander Test Report (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 11:42:05 -1000
Aloha, Some of you may recall I had raised questions about these tests right after returning from Dayton, where I heard Steve's talk. My thoughts were posted in late May, and Steve asked that we refr
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00701.html (10,187 bytes)

153. [TowerTalk] Antenna Comparisons (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 14:32:48 -1000
They will, Tom. Mine, all seven of them!, work better up about 10 to 12 feet on Radio Shack push up poles. I can push them up a bunch more, and just might, hi. I also have only 4 elevated 90 degree r
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00710.html (8,029 bytes)

154. [TowerTalk] Steve Best on Mismatch loss, transmitters and tuners (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 15:18:53 -1000
Jim, KH7M had written: David asks KH7M: Having not heard anything back from Steve Best, I will go ahead and answer David. No, of course not, the feed system has created nothing. What has occured is t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00711.html (13,365 bytes)

155. [TowerTalk] KH7M's Concerns about Groundwave (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 17:02:10 -1000
Aloha Ward, Well now that I have the ARRL BOD and their activities sort of out of my mind, I would like to make a proposal to you and the towertalk reflector. There are certainly plenty of us intere
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00844.html (7,768 bytes)

156. [TowerTalk] Reflections, Conjugate Matching and Jim Reid's comments (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1998 13:33:00 -1000
Hmmm? See my name still remains as part of the subject line. Otherwise, I would not comment; however, such time domain problems as discussed above are of absolutely NO importance in HF amateur radio,
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00865.html (10,820 bytes)

157. [TowerTalk] Re: TopBand: good commercial 160 ant? (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 12:04:25 -1000
OK, so I just loaded 10 new Duracell batteries in my 259B, and out to the base of the TL160 to measure the resistance and reactance. Gladiator TL160 is 38 feet long, with base up about 12 feet, so to
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00917.html (10,053 bytes)

158. [TowerTalk] Re: Impact of Reflected Power (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 18:34:33 -1000
Nope! Always the speed of light in the coax or twin lead reduced by the velocity factor of the particular line, typically, 60 to 80% of llight speed. Of course not, the echos on the transmission lin
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00956.html (11,045 bytes)

159. [TowerTalk] Understanding Lightning Abatement (?) (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 11:23:56 -1000
Thanks to God that lightning strikes are a very minimal problem in the Hawaiian Islands. We have sufficient others to worry about: volcano eruptions, tsunamis, earthquakes on the Big Islands, and the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00155.html (7,761 bytes)

160. [TowerTalk] > crankup use model (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 10:49:55 -0900
Aloha Mike, Six years ago I received both a zoning variance and use permit to have a crank up above the palm tree tops -- the supposed height limit here on the island of Kauai. I was to have the ante
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00317.html (9,969 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu