Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jreid@aloha.net: 281 ]

Total 281 documents matching your query.

81. [TowerTalk] Blowing Mosley Traps ? (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 15:19:04 -1000
Hi, Any one out there actually experience a case of Mosley trap failure; as used on their larger trapped beams: Pro series, TA-34, etc. If so, what power level, and if at legal level, at what vswr??
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00357.html (7,080 bytes)

82. [TowerTalk] Mosley Traps and Henry 3ks -- Thanks for replies (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 11:49:58 -1000
Aloha, Rcv'd many responses. Thanks to all, even those who don't care for Mosley antennas; yes, I heard the talk at Dayton last May, hi. Were the Mosley folks upset -- you bet. They requested an oppo
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00379.html (8,374 bytes)

83. [TowerTalk] Mosley Traps and Henry 3ks -- Thanks for replies (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 14:19:27 -1000
Boy, even on Christmas Eve, I can step into it!! I wrote, a bit ago: Steve replied, and rightly so: for about to - Well, my source was the tall lady in the Mosley booth on the main floor within Hara
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00384.html (11,436 bytes)

84. [TowerTalk] Vertical Antenna Ground systems (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1998 11:06:56 -1000
Tom, W8JI, has written, in part: Well I have just recently purchased 10,000 feet, 10 spools of #16 solid copper radial wire; several hundred dollars. Now I can't use it. I have been "invited" to remo
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00408.html (17,329 bytes)

85. [TowerTalk] Grove Farm Plantation Office Info (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1998 12:55:19 -1000
Aloha, A few days ago I was asked by someone on here to post info on leasing plantation lands for horses here on Kauai. I have evidently deleted the particular piece, so apology for bandwidth in hope
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00410.html (7,143 bytes)

86. [TowerTalk] Observation about elevated vertical antennas (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1998 17:48:49 -1000
Hi again, With my vertical triple bander up on the roof deck, have noticed that the vertical element and radials need to be a bit shorter to resonate within the frequency ranges of interest. For exam
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00413.html (10,485 bytes)

87. [TowerTalk] Vertical Antenna Points (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 11:07:30 -1000
Aloha LB, Boy, very sorry to hear of your discomfort these past several days; sure helps open our eyes to how we take so many things for granted when they are withdrawn!! We had a similar experience
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00452.html (9,913 bytes)

88. [TowerTalk] Gladiator to Half Wave Vertical (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 13:31:29 -1000
Aloha, I believe I have successfully transformed my elevated "ground plane", two elevated radial 10 meter Gladiator into a half wave vertical, center fed. I am sitting out here near mid-Pacific liste
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00470.html (8,475 bytes)

89. [TowerTalk] Re: [AMPS] Antenna Delta (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 08:27:08 -1000
Aloha, a few have asked what test report/Dayton talk did I have reference to in the below statement: ordered a Force 12 C4 antenna. This is the C3 with the addition of a 37 foot dipole element for 40
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00504.html (8,169 bytes)

90. [TowerTalk] Power x RG58 (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 13:00:50 -1000
Most of us avoid the smaller coax because the loss to rcv'd signals! To me, for runs over several feet, I will not use the small coax because of loss to signals and perhaps the chance of missing a w
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00209.html (8,249 bytes)

91. [TowerTalk] Consequences of line loss??? Was: Power x RG58 (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 08:07:06 -1000
Aloha to all, I have rcvd a few responses to my assertion that the loss of RG58 coax, in longer runs, could cause one to miss the weakest signals in the rcv mode. Well, these two responses in particu
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00239.html (9,181 bytes)

92. [TowerTalk] LMR 900 Question (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 15:09:22 -1000
Hi, I want to get more of my xmt signal out to the antenna field, and have been thinking about replacing my run of LMR 400 with LMR 900 -- it is a lot more expensive than what the 400 cost, but also
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00462.html (8,170 bytes)

93. [TowerTalk] "Tuning up" Vertical top loaded antennas (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 13:15:15 -1000
Ok, I have nine of these things; elevated, with four elevated radials each so far; with plans now to add more radials. Also, vines have found the radials to be a great place to hang on to while sprea
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00085.html (10,095 bytes)

94. [TowerTalk] "Tuning up" Vertical top loaded antennas (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 15:18:57 -1000
Hi, I don't think it would make a bit of difference. It is the capacity loading to ground from the radials the drags the resonant frequency of the vertical element/ radial system down below the band
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00091.html (8,400 bytes)

95. [TowerTalk] US Tower Shipping Times (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1998 15:37:23 -1000
Was written: to A few years ago, my US Tower was shipped out here to Kauai by them via Yellow Freight. This trucking company rcv'd the tower in Visalia, delivered it to Matson Shipping in Oakland at
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00119.html (9,049 bytes)

96. [TowerTalk] Multipath vs. A Question of GAIN (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 16:50:59 -1000
Actually 'tis the benefit of antenna diversity reception. It was written, and so it must be: Been used by the telephone companies for decades. distortion Interesting, I notice exactly the same thing
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00681.html (7,982 bytes)

97. [TowerTalk] Mismatch Loss and Tuners (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 15:42:26 -1000
--Original Message-- From: bob alexander <realex@flash.net> To: Charles R Constantine <kr6c@juno.com> Cc: towertalk@contesting.com <towertalk@contesting.com> To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Date: Tues
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00201.html (9,437 bytes)

98. [TowerTalk] Kenwood TS-950SDX F.S. (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 18:11:46 -1000
Aloha, delete immediately if not interested in the purchase of a super DX/contest rig! My TS-950SDX is for sale and is now on the way to the Kenwood Service Center in Calif. I will have it shipped di
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00209.html (10,365 bytes)

99. [TowerTalk] Re: [DXR] Kenwood TS-950SDX F.S. (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 20:17:20 -1000
--Original Message-- From: Leith Jennings <leith@inhb.co.nz> To: Jim Reid <jreid@aloha.net>; Dx-News <dx-news@jerseycape.net>; dx-list@makelist.com <dx-list@makelist.com>; CW Reflector <cw@qth.net>;
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00214.html (8,068 bytes)

100. [TowerTalk] Kenwood TS-950SDX - Sold! (score: 1)
Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 10:19:09 -1000
Thanks to those showing interest. Went to the first e-mail response I rcv'd; fair that way. Mahalo and 73, Jim, KH7M -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00228.html (6,698 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu