Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jruing@ameritech.net: 1145 ]

Total 1145 documents matching your query.

301. Re: [TenTec] Headphones for ORION I? (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:14:49 -0400
Very light weight. Very comfortable, I think. And NOT too snug. I wear them all day - especially when doing stuff around the house. They have a vinyl leatherette ear pad. I cannot say whether or not
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00143.html (10,844 bytes)

302. Re: [TenTec] Headphones for ORION I? (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:12:16 -0400
"Quit Phones" ... eh? Are they of such low quality that they quit ? ;-) (Sorry... could not resist poking a little fun... ;-) == JHR == == _______________________________________________ TenTec maili
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00150.html (8,418 bytes)

303. Re: [TenTec] Headphones for ORION I? (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 20:56:07 -0400
I understand that. BUT IN MY VIEW THOSE K-24OS AND BEYERDYMANIC DT-770S ARE SOME REALLY EASY TO WEAR CANS... and both have awesome sound... so if you cannot wear those all day... er... ah... you are
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00165.html (14,541 bytes)

304. Re: [TenTec] Headphones for ORION I? (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 21:14:51 -0400
I use 12 band graphic equalizer to filter out the highs and lows and thus they don't bother me. It really helps clarify old time radio programs, which are mostly speech, anyway. I sometimes use a Tim
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00166.html (11,528 bytes)

305. Re: [TenTec] Headphones and QRN (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 01:22:02 -0400
That seems a sensible inquiry. It is possible that very, very inexpensive, dollar store headphones have limited frequency response. But even then, they should play way beyond the 200 to 5,000 Hz freq
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00184.html (9,073 bytes)

306. Re: [TenTec] Test (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:14:20 -0400
Check your "preferences" and account settings at yahoogroups.com. There is an option to get daily email copies of all the messages. I presume you know this, but for some reason, for some accounts, th
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00193.html (7,754 bytes)

307. Re: [TenTec] swr (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:53:38 -0400
Phil Salas has written several pieces on matching these big sticks on 160 and 80 meters. http://www.ad5x.com/articles.htm This one is especially helpful for 43 foot monopole owners. http://www.ad5x.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00197.html (8,883 bytes)

308. Re: [TenTec] swr (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:54:22 -0400
I also have a 43 foot monopole antenna (with 63 radials - but I agree 45 radials at 45 feet each is a good base.) I would suspect the balun / un-un you might be using. I know both ArraySolutions - Ze
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00198.html (11,265 bytes)

309. Re: [TenTec] Test (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:57:03 -0400
Duh.... that is right. Thanks Lou and Jim. I apologize for any confusion my answer may cause. My road to He** is well paved with all my "good intentions." ;-) == K8JHR == ____________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00199.html (7,635 bytes)

310. Re: [TenTec] swr (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 23:16:37 -0400
Agreed on all points, Jerry ! Definitely pushes the tuner to its limits. I never work top band with high power... I cannot imagine how little power is actually radiating outward when I work 160 on my
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00204.html (9,503 bytes)

311. Re: [TenTec] swr (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:45:18 -0400
Interesting... I was not aware they had something like that. This may require a deeper look see. I like the honesty of the catalog description when they say: However, at 160/80M it is virtually impos
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00214.html (9,337 bytes)

312. Re: [TenTec] swr (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:48:46 -0400
Not arguing... but how do we know that? So much of the literature claims that impedance is either way high or way low, and SWR is way wacky, and, therefore, there are HUGE losses in the coax... Your
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00221.html (8,990 bytes)

313. Re: [TenTec] swr (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:14:21 -0400
Yes, this comports with conclusions stated in the much of the literature on the matter. Oddly enough, this big stick vertical monopole has proven itself a very quiet, solid RECEIVING antenna for bot
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00237.html (10,420 bytes)

314. Re: [TenTec] swr (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:16:36 -0400
Agreed. That kinda sums it up nicely. I could not find any details, either. I am thinking I favor Mr. Salas's design - it is open, and apparently has the imprimatur of the QST Editorial Board. It loo
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00238.html (9,227 bytes)

315. Re: [TenTec] free to good home (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:23:34 -0400
If you send them to me before you send them to someone else, I will scan them into PDF format and then send them on. I scanned something like 65 some odd manuals for TenTec as a favor to Scott Robbin
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00298.html (8,321 bytes)

316. Re: [TenTec] F.S. Model 217 xtal Filter (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:47:58 -0400
Hi Rick... good luck selling the item. Your listing reminds me of the local ham, a REALLY OLD guy we all love, who wondered what shipping company is called CONUS -- because "all dem guys 'only ship C
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00307.html (7,421 bytes)

317. Re: [TenTec] Looking for "cheap" rig or honest and patient ham (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:14:53 -0400
YES... YOU WERE VERY GENEROUS with her money..... ;-) Some say politicians are similarly generous with a portion of my pay check every week... ;-) (Just poking fun... nothing serious here...;-) == JH
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00017.html (10,163 bytes)

318. Re: [TenTec] Looking for "cheap" rig or honest and patient ham (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:18:32 -0400
HOLY COW... he sure has a LOT of equipment ! If the guy with the most toys wins, then I concede the whole game and match right now ! == JHR == == _______________________________________________ TenTe
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00018.html (9,422 bytes)

319. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and Titan III For Sale (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:01:12 -0400
Lou... how COULD you sell them to make... er... "room" ? You obviously have too many shoes... or furniture... or family members... ;-) Suggestion -- Instead of selling the radio, why not turn these p
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00106.html (7,951 bytes)

320. Re: [TenTec] Omni D issue (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 20:36:25 -0400
How can I get one? ;-) But seriously folks, if what you said is true, can he fix it? == K8JHR == == _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://li
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00113.html (7,792 bytes)

Current List: 301 - 320
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu