Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jruing@ameritech.net: 1145 ]

Total 1145 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:03:13 -0400
What does this mean ? Thanks. == JHR == _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00205.html (7,213 bytes)

322. Re: [TenTec] Yahoo groups (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:09:00 -0400
Geeze, guys... how hard is it? You click on a web page link... you type in your name and a sentence saying why you wanna join, which is designed to filter out unwanted guests and spammers from real m
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00206.html (8,852 bytes)

323. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 12:41:35 -0400
Hi Gerry -- and Ron, et. al.. -- This is what it said in an email to the TenTec Ambassadors... The EAGLE is priced between the TEN-TEC JUPITER and OMNI-VII. U.S. retail prices (not including shipping
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00211.html (8,004 bytes)

324. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 12:53:43 -0400
I would buy that what you describe... not sure about this one. I kinda thought the Eagle looked like price-feature competition for the troubled Yaesu 950 or the newer lower icom models. == JHR == ___
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00212.html (8,699 bytes)

325. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:44:00 -0400
Interesting question, Ken. I think it is a matter of careful marketing semantics. Unique crystal ladder filters... Hmmm... what is unique? A. Is it the use of crystal filters that is unique? - OR - B
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00237.html (9,646 bytes)

326. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:19:57 -0400
Are we being careful to compare apples to apples? When comparing the K-32 any other unit, I always make sure that I am comparing the K-3 factory build price with the other radio, because they are, th
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00238.html (10,643 bytes)

327. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:48:02 -0400
I don't know if it is But it would be swell if it was on the rear accessory jack and simply accessed using an RCA connector. I doubt it, don't know But that would be a swell place to put it, along wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00242.html (9,636 bytes)

328. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:57:02 -0400
Oh Thanks for the update. Parenthetically, for my better edification, what would be an appropriate jack or output connector for this purpose? Happy Trails. == James / K8JHR == _______________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00245.html (9,739 bytes)

329. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:20:19 -0400
OK... thanks for the uptake. Do they do this on the Omni VII ? Reason I ask is, I am a former SWL interested in receiver radios before joining the ham clan, and the Omni VII has a great gen coverage
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00247.html (9,860 bytes)

330. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:35:36 -0400
This is its chief virtue, I think. Newer radios are all incorporating digital processes and technologies and it seems the way of the future. and after I am a new ham. The Omni VII is my first transce
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00274.html (13,567 bytes)

331. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:03:01 -0400
THANKS FOR THE DETAILED EXPLANATION. Helps a lot. THAT makes sense, and gives it an historical perspective. I don't, really. I only mentioned it because, even with the design and purpose limitations
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00276.html (12,181 bytes)

332. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:57:20 -0400
OK... I can follow that. Thanks for the additional gloss. == JHR == == _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00281.html (10,204 bytes)

333. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:21:43 -0400
If there is just one, that is one more than the Eagle will allow. I think leaving off a pan adapter output on a $1800 rig is unconscionable. I should not have to cobble one into the rig myself. I say
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00287.html (10,572 bytes)

334. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 01:47:33 -0400
Rich -- I appreciate your position. Nevertheless, I think I represent a different market segment. Seems like everyone would create the new radio in 1) their own image, and 2) make it as simple and tr
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00311.html (20,951 bytes)

335. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:39:59 -0400
I think the value in the rig is twofold: 1) John Henry says it will be of a modular design, a model for future rig design, easily fixed and updated. 2) If you read the specs, it looks like a fairly u
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00352.html (8,479 bytes)

336. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc. (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 01:13:12 -0400
Oh NO, not at all Andy... Because if we believe all the nostalgic banter, then we would realize radios were so much better in days gone by, as if radio is on a reverse technological drift, where Coll
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00390.html (11,492 bytes)

337. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc. (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 01:56:26 -0400
Yep - I thought so ! ;-) Then, why would anyone want a new radio ? How did this happen ? OK... I am being sarcastic, but really, all this chatter about how good it was in the old days is getting me d
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00394.html (11,852 bytes)

338. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 01:59:19 -0400
* DING ! Perhaps they don't understand what it is. * DING ! Bet-cha I can beat-cha with one rig tied behind my back... ;-) OK... just poking some fun. Nothing serious here. BUT ...I WANT a rig with
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00395.html (10,589 bytes)

339. Re: [TenTec] The Unique Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:06:22 -0400
Gee I sure hope so. But it COULD be argued that the Eagle has a sort of retro appearance, and perhaps that will appeal the LARGE portion of the ham community, who is, frankly, an older, aging demogra
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00396.html (8,602 bytes)

340. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc. (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:52:09 -0400
Nice post, Joe. A lot of buckshot in that one shell. Thank - especially for replying in the spirit I intended my post in. Maybe this Eagle is the right balance between old style and approach and new
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00399.html (11,176 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu