Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jruing@ameritech.net: 412 ]

Total 412 documents matching your query.

341. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Talk 43 ft verticals (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:09:04 -0500
Please describe the capacity hat you are considering. I have been talking with DX-Engineering about adding some top and/or bottom loading, and I am curious about your ideas. Thanks. == James - K8JHR
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00573.html (7,068 bytes)

342. Re: [TowerTalk] New SteppIR Antennas (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:57:21 -0500
Greetings RS -- What did they the new models? How would we know if we found them? ;-) Happy trails. == K8JHR == == _______________________________________________ ____________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00607.html (7,257 bytes)

343. Re: [TowerTalk] Mast material (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:25:06 -0500
Right, Rick. Many antenna manufacturers fail to adequately distinguish between inside and outside diameter. DX-Engineering sells a 43 foot monopole made of aluminum TUBING and it starts with a 2" OUT
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00613.html (9,688 bytes)

344. Re: [TowerTalk] Mast material (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:04:57 -0500
Funny that is not what DX engineering said -- or what company that sold me the pipe! Anyway, the point remains you gotta pay attention to what it is you are using because not all metal hollowware is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00623.html (9,249 bytes)

345. Re: [TowerTalk] Power poles as antenna supports (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:29:07 -0500
Woah... that IS great opportunity. I take it you are going to inherit the LAND *and* and POLES... or just the Poles? Your post is not clear. But it may cost you like $200 - $500 per pole to have them
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00625.html (8,233 bytes)

346. Re: [TowerTalk] Two Inverted "Vs" (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:30:59 -0500
How high are they? What are they suspended from? What other stuff is nearby (trees, buildings, poles, metal stuff?) What type of coax are you using? Length ? What gauge wire are the elements? I think
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00627.html (7,761 bytes)

347. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: 6061 T-6 as mast material (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:46:00 -0500
I only made a dumb mistake once... I thought I was wrong... but I wasn't And if you are buying THAT ... Happy trails. == James -K8JHR == == _______________________________________________ ___________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00642.html (8,264 bytes)

348. Re: [TowerTalk] lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 00:45:33 -0500
Is there any reason one would not want to put protective devices at BOTH the tower AND the entry point? Unlike wearing belt and suspenders... it might be a good idea...? == K8JHR == == ______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00706.html (7,298 bytes)

349. Re: [TowerTalk] lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 01:01:05 -0500
That is probably an accurate assessment about many installations. A very experienced and respected local ham has three towers, and one of them is not grounded in any other way than its base in the gr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00027.html (8,615 bytes)

350. Re: [TowerTalk] lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:20:30 -0500
I connect my disconnected cables to a ground buss, that is grounded three feet outside the shack. Bought it form The Wireman. Seemed like a good idea at the time. I did not want the disconnected cabl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00041.html (9,324 bytes)

351. Re: [TowerTalk] Wire Antenna Suggestions Wanted (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:32:32 -0500
Why just one antenna? Why just between the two towers? I would put up two inverted V dipoles, in different directions, plus a delta loop between them - or mix and match some of the suggestions you re
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00067.html (8,719 bytes)

352. Re: [TowerTalk] Wire Antenna Suggestions Wanted. If you have 100 acres to play with and more. (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:38:34 -0500
I would put up just such a dipole.... ON THE TOWER !!! A Tower with some wire hanging off it... you bet I would have a dipole.... on the tower. == K8JHR == == ________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00068.html (7,913 bytes)

353. Re: [TowerTalk] cage dipole (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:08:57 -0500
Dan -- this one of the best messages I have seen in a long while.!!! Funny. ... but Serious. I had the same feeling many times practicing law... what would the client pay to have me just tell him wha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00091.html (9,722 bytes)

354. Re: [TowerTalk] cage dipole (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:11:16 -0500
But that design is much harder to sell to the XYL.... and that outweighs the obvious cool factory you mention !! ;-) == JHR == == _______________________________________________ _____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00092.html (8,678 bytes)

355. Re: [TowerTalk] cage dipole (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:16:00 -0500
No... silly.... it is a LADDER antenna and should be fed with LADDER LINE ..... ;-) Or call it a "co-linear, parallel bridged element dualpole"... or some such mumbo jumbo combination of neat soundin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00093.html (8,713 bytes)

356. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions Solicited (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 01:03:59 -0500
Local fellers seem to admire the Palstar model... == K8JHR == I bought an Array Solutions AIM4170. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00145.html (8,146 bytes)

357. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions: Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:40:16 -0500
Hey.... All is not lost !! If you decide to keep the old standby... that means you have SAVED HUNDREDS of dollars.... which means you CAN BUY something else... some other little shack accessory... or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00171.html (7,991 bytes)

358. Re: [TowerTalk] You have been announced a winner (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 06:03:50 -0400
My car was made in Britain... Oxford, in fact, and it is a left hand drive.... how do you explain THAT? == Richards - K8JHR == == _______________________________________________ _____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00182.html (8,393 bytes)

359. Re: [TowerTalk] You have been announced a winner (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 20:07:45 -0400
Yes... we have probably worked this way too long... == Anonymous - K8JHR == Perhaps many can hold down the BS and divert to other sites. == _______________________________________________ ___________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00195.html (8,786 bytes)

360. Re: [TowerTalk] phasing multiband verticals (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:21:10 -0400
Interesting, Jack. (really... this is a serious question.) What is the cost of doing it your way at the antenna? Thanks. == K8JHR == == _______________________________________________ _______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00218.html (8,328 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu