Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jruing@ameritech.net: 412 ]

Total 412 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TowerTalk] 160/80m Inverted L dualband design (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:12:59 -0400
What 80 meter vertical did you install? A wire or home brew antenna, or a commercially mfd antenna? == -- _______________________________________________ _____________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00066.html (8,208 bytes)

82. Re: [TowerTalk] 160/80m Inverted L dualband design (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:06:32 -0400
Geeze, Pat... those plots all show a rather narrow bandwidth on all the options. What does the modeling program say about the old fashioned V dipole? How about a sloper like the Alpha Delta DX-B sing
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00069.html (9,230 bytes)

83. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator question (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:53:44 -0400
Agreed -- I apologize for acting in hast. My road to Hell is well paved with my "good intentions." Sorry. It really is not my style and was not my best work. == K8JHR == -- == _______________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00083.html (8,028 bytes)

84. Re: [TowerTalk] To Shunt feed or Not to Shunt feed?? (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:04:56 -0400
Absolutely correct. I would not start any antenna project without an antenna analyzer. I put up a ham stick dipole this weekend, as a temporary and portable project, and it would have been impossible
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00183.html (7,959 bytes)

85. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground Clamps (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:29:16 -0400
Did you test when 1) the radio was turned on? and/or 2) when you were transmitting? Maybe it is different if either of those aspects change...? (Don't know, myself, just asking...) == K8JHR == measur
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00202.html (7,478 bytes)

86. Re: [TowerTalk] To Shunt feed or Not to Shunt feed?? (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:49:38 -0400
That is a fair question. I believe the answer depends upon the type of antenna you are constructing, and the circumstances and location where you install it. If you are speaking about constructing a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00206.html (10,421 bytes)

87. Re: [TowerTalk] [Force 12 Talk] Antennas and power lines don't mix (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:54:36 -0400
Amen, Bruddah. Thanks for sharing this story. Your love for fellow hams clearly exceeds your vanity. Happy trails and good luck fixing your antenna. Happy trails and 73. -- Richards - K8JHR -- == . =
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00311.html (7,274 bytes)

88. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Base Fenced Enclosure-Safety/ Limited Access (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:23:01 -0400
My mom used a similar setup (without the top tarp) as a portable dog kennel in her back yard. == JHR == _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00312.html (7,491 bytes)

89. Re: [TowerTalk] NEW TOOL (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:35:39 -0400
I do not recall having all that much trouble with chipped plating from pliers... or any of the other problems this tool is purportedly designed to avoid. == K8JHR == == ______________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00313.html (7,455 bytes)

90. Re: [TowerTalk] Electronic Dog Containment Fence Noisy? NOT (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:51:47 -0400
Geeze... Gene.... If it uses HF frequcies, I wonder if WE could interfere with IT?... f'rinstance, if it ends up working on a HAM frequency, one might end up driving the dog crazy when he transmits!
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00315.html (7,514 bytes)

91. Re: [TowerTalk] [Force 12 Talk] Antennas and power lines don't mix (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:16:51 -0400
Interesting observation, and an important distinction VE4XT raises in his post. The answer is, of course, No - the alternative is to use an antenna that cannot be a problem. One has to live within th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00327.html (10,304 bytes)

92. Re: [TowerTalk] 2 HAMS died in Kansas City (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:23:44 -0400
Someone made a negative comment when I said one should keep his tower twice the distance from power lines. I read that rule in a tower instruction book. I think I will stick to that advice regardless
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00369.html (9,287 bytes)

93. Re: [TowerTalk] 2 HAMS died in Kansas City - Common Sense (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:34:13 -0400
My local ham friends made fun of me when I hired an electrician to run a second 110 v and also a separate 220 v line to my new shack in my new house. They said I should save the $250 and put them in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00370.html (8,467 bytes)

94. Re: [TowerTalk] 2 HAMS died in Kansas City (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:42:12 -0400
Not so, Dick Tracy -- the power company here in Michigan comes by and trims the trees -- they removed five whole fir trees one day from my yard. You would love the power company here: They left quite
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00389.html (10,009 bytes)

95. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower regulatory climate in Fort Collins - Loveland, CO area (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:42:43 -0400
Get a lawyer to help you. Realtors, bless their souls, are often not truly qualified to comment on such zoning and regulatory matters. It might take you some time to fine one really qualified. Get hi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00451.html (9,439 bytes)

96. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower regulatory climate in Fort Collins - Loveland, CO area (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:58:14 -0400
Hi Dave -- I do believe all subdivisions prohibit antennas or towers -- consider my 6 year old development (a subdivision) does not prohibit or regulate antennas or towers in any way! Yippee !! Howev
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00452.html (11,045 bytes)

97. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Dogs on Dateline (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 23:39:00 -0400
Interesting Point, David C -- I had a favorite college economics professor who would diss 60 Minutes for the same reason. He said 60 Minutes locates a single example of some tragic situation, and the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00530.html (8,233 bytes)

98. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower regulatory climate in Fort Collins - Loveland, CO area (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:13:00 -0400
Obviously, Dave, we we have different experiences, and do not handle these matters in the same way. One should never wait until closing to review any restrictions or other documents of title. Doing t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00531.html (13,971 bytes)

99. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower regulatory climate in Fort Collins - Loveland, CO area (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:15:21 -0400
Happy trails and 73. -- Richards - K8JHR -- == _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00532.html (11,835 bytes)

100. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower regulatory climate in Fort Collins - Loveland, CO area (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:25:38 -0400
This is simply not true. It is completely a buyer beware situation. In most places, a seller has no obligation to research or examine title for you. If you don't make your own examination, you will b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00534.html (12,337 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu