Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jvarn359@gmail.com: 61 ]

Total 61 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] Tri-Ex W-51 (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2022 18:33:51 -0700
Are you comparing an old Tri-Ex W-51 vs. the newer Tashjian W-51/WT-51? If so, the Tri-Ex is structurally different than the Tashjian version. The Tri-Ex had legs with 0.095, 0.083 and 0.065 inch wal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-07/msg00152.html (7,597 bytes)

42. Re: [TowerTalk] Phillystran (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 10:47:42 -0700
Since Phillystran has been unobtainable or costly, I've been recommending Mastrant-M to my tower clients. I've had Mastrant-M at my station for 5 years now and it's held up very well with little or n
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-10/msg00014.html (7,980 bytes)

43. Re: [TowerTalk] Phillystran to steel tower connection. (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 08:17:29 -0700
Another reason I'm glad I chose Mastrant-M for my towers. The stainless steel duplex clips don't interfere with Yagi patterns. 73 Jim K6OK Tim K3LR wrote: "The problem is significant and is caused by
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-10/msg00077.html (8,383 bytes)

44. Re: [TowerTalk] More friction needed (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 10:25:55 -0800
Dave AB7E wrote>> Personally, I think the idea of using multiple U-bolts is the best way to go. << I agree. And instead of shooting from the hip and guessing, with U-bolts you can calculate and engin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-11/msg00031.html (9,389 bytes)

45. Re: [TowerTalk] More friction needed (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 16:02:12 -0800
Sorry my Gmail messed up the line breaks and made it unreadable. Reposting for anyone interested in calculating U-bolt torsion resistance for masts. I'm fairly confident this method is a good approxi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-11/msg00038.html (9,607 bytes)

46. Re: [TowerTalk] New York state wind survival requirements for antennas (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 10:23:25 -0800
In general here's how design wind speeds are determined: * The city, county or state adopts the Int'l Bldg Code * IBC in Chapter 31, Section 3108, defers all design matters relating to towers to the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-11/msg00149.html (9,046 bytes)

47. Re: [TowerTalk] New York state wind survival requirements for (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 13:14:41 -0800
Not my experience on the West Coast, unfortunately. What has happened in most jurisdictions is the Planning/Building people have, over the last 20 years, seen a lot of permit applications for cell to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-11/msg00151.html (7,942 bytes)

48. Re: [TowerTalk] Trylon (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 09:37:49 -0800
There isn't one. Pascals are units of pressure, while mph and kph are units of wind speed. 1 Pa = 0.020885 lbs per square foot The 550 Pa criterion is roughly 11.5 lbs/sq ft of pressure. Basic wind p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00049.html (7,386 bytes)

49. Re: [TowerTalk] ChatGPT (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 11:52:50 -0700
Here's an example where I asked ChatGPT to calculate the bending moment strength of Rohn 45 leg tubing. It's quite straightforward, a simple equation, and ChatGPT fumbles it pretty badly here: K6OK:
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-04/msg00020.html (10,210 bytes)

50. [TowerTalk] Now Let's Try GPT-4 (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 10:00:23 -0700
GPT-4 is the smarter, next generation AI machine. Let's do the same technical question and see how it does. (Note: I got an e-mail from a really sharp experienced ham who caught my typo in my ChatGPT
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-04/msg00021.html (9,860 bytes)

51. Re: [TowerTalk] Words. (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 19:32:06 -0700
Ed N1UR: "Europeans use the words tower and mast pretty inter-- changeably in my experience. It was clearly what we Americans would call a guyed tower." Seems the American tower building code committ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-05/msg00057.html (7,633 bytes)

52. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower eye bolt source (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2023 10:06:26 -0700
Dave Leeson wrote: "For antenna or tower use, avoid the eye bolts that are just bent in a circle" I don't quite agree with this broad generalization. If the open style eye bolt has a working load lim
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-06/msg00015.html (7,156 bytes)

53. Re: [TowerTalk] EHS cable and torque bars (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 10:01:14 -0700
Mike WB2FKO wrote >> QTH is north Florida so I want to make the setup as storm-proof as practical. Any insight appreciated.<< Virtually all of Florida is in a Special Wind Region (Hurricane Zone). Th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-06/msg00065.html (8,254 bytes)

54. Re: [TowerTalk] Using Mastrant rope guying Rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 15:14:32 -0700
re Mastrant: have experience in the smaller sizes. Installed 5mm on two 25G towers at 65 ft 5 years ago. I haven't needed to re-tension them, creep has been minimal. No visible wear or degradation of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-07/msg00064.html (8,897 bytes)

55. Re: [TowerTalk] Opposing boom to mast plates? (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 09:13:11 -0700
Dave, W6NL/HC8L wrote: "Thanks [to N7WS] for the link to the very detailed Weber papers. They clarify the issue. ." Yes, but as you alluded to, K5IU's analysis is only true in a world where the wind
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-09/msg00069.html (11,719 bytes)

56. Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 21:26:36 -0800
Bob -- You are on the right track. It's a creeping problem where local agencies here in Calif have adopted extensive "wireless facility" ordinances requiring hearings, reports, and expensive fees and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-11/msg00056.html (9,200 bytes)

57. Re: [TowerTalk] SELF-SUPPORTING TOWER NEEDED IN THE MIDWEST (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:40:59 -0800
John KK9A Not just towers. Utility poles, street lights, billboards, 3-story townhomes on zero lot line... all within the neighbor's fall zone. For whatever reason some local agencies have a double s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2024-03/msg00000.html (7,020 bytes)

58. Re: [TowerTalk] Mounting Yagi on the side of the Trylon tower. (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:00:28 -0700
If your tower has legs made out of angle iron instead of tubes or pipe, you may want to have a structural engineering analysis done. Angle iron strength varies greatly depending on the direction of a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2024-03/msg00109.html (8,184 bytes)

59. Re: [TowerTalk] Homebrew 30m beam (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 11:03:58 -0700
If I had 40-2CD parts laying around I would definitely use loading coils to make a 2-el beam for 30m. I would toss the Cushcraft coils and make my own high-Q coils. This will make the 30m beam lighte
/archives//html/Towertalk/2024-05/msg00000.html (6,808 bytes)

60. Re: [TowerTalk] Homebrew 30m beam (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 13:26:53 -0700
Informative site, but not specific to 30 meters. For an excellent example of a 30m loaded beam, see Norm N6JV's website: http://n6jv.com/30meterbeam.html 73 Jim K6OK _________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2024-05/msg00002.html (7,679 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu