Mail Archive Search: <+from:k.alexander@rogers.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:k.alexander@rogers.com: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Watch your dits this weekend (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:33:48 -0800 (PST); As the holder of VE3HLS (a.k.a. VE3HLH, VE3SLS, VE3HLI and so on) I'm sure my call is a black mark in more than a few contest logs, and will be this weekend! Being QRP doesn't help either. 73 - Ken _; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00507.html (11,487 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Shack Lighting Ideas (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:30:40 -0700 (PDT); My shack came equipped with pot fixtures in the ceiling with 65 watt halogen lamps with large frosted diffusers in front when I moved in. As it turns out there's a fixture about 2 ft off each end of; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00419.html (9,614 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections - A Cheater Confesses (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:11:47 -0700 (PDT); Folks, All this talk of cheating and station inspections has been weighing heavily on my conscience these last few days. I think it's time to come clean; I'm a cheater! You see, a few weekends ago in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00299.html (10,787 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 80 mtr antenna (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:24:20 -0400 (EDT); Hi Glenn, What you're describing is a Self Contained Vertical (SCV) antenna. It uses the basic delta loop configuration but is fed part way up the side of one of the legs. They're (mostly) vertically; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00043.html (9,164 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] A call to action (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:37:58 -0400 (EDT); Hi Dave, All true, but they were hams already and The Magic Of Radio means something to them. I haven't gotten that far with my non-ham nephew yet. I think that computers will provide the initial hoo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00511.html (10,288 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Call to Action (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:48:57 -0400 (EDT); The "big red button" would be a good thing for those of us with personal ham radio websites to add to our own home pages. Any graphic designer types out there that want to make up a "big red botton"; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00500.html (9,441 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] A call to action (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:31:25 -0400 (EDT); I guess I was thinking of something else then. Well maybe it's high time they had one. Even if they don't, other venues such as Contesting.com might be better at providing timely information and quic; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00497.html (9,811 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] A call to action (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:37:33 -0400 (EDT); I've been encouraging my 18 year old nephew to join me in a contest. I've been emphasizing digital modes mainly because I think they would appeal to his love of online chatting. SSB would be the next; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00496.html (10,591 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] A call to action (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:26:27 -0400 (EDT); I promise not to nit pick, blast packet or propose rule changes! My first impression is that more of what we read about contesting in magazines like CQ and QST should be geared towards beginners, to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00456.html (8,763 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 00:59:55 -0400 (EDT); You exchange contest data with the operator, and maybe get a warm, fuzzy experience if you know the guy, but none of it happens without the equipment (the station) and the location of that station m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00378.html (9,358 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 00:50:40 -0400 (EDT); To continue with my previous example. Working me in KH6 ia all about RF-based point-to-point technology. It couldn't take place without it. That's pretty harsh! Please note that my operating a KH6 st; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00377.html (12,223 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules - Getting out of hand (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:45:52 -0400 (EDT); Sorry, no sale Paul. If I had a ham friend in KH6 who let me operate his station remotely in the next CQWW you'd have to turn your antenna towards Hawaii, you'd have to wait until propagation favours; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00326.html (9,428 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:32:50 -0400 (EDT); As a VE3, I'd love to have a remote contest station on Sable Island (180 mi off the Nove Scotia coast) and another on the west coast of Vancouver Island (British Columbia) and operate from home. Oper; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00213.html (9,339 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] Real-time Scoreboards (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:11:38 -0500 (EST); David, K1TTT plugged W1VE's live amateur radio contest scoreboard (http://www.w1ve.com/livescores/) shortly before ARRL DX CW started. I signed up after I got rolling in the contest and found it was; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00324.html (8,863 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Viral Contesting [was: Contesting Extinction] (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 15:08:41 -0400 (EDT); I don't know about "viral", but... I gave VHF contesting a try for the last 2 or 3 summers and had a great time...when 6m was open. Otherwise it was a fruitless effort. I went to a lot of trouble to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00091.html (11,482 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] not top-10 box competitions & comparisons (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 10:21:38 -0400 (EDT); Nice to see somebody finally taking the ball and running with it. Seems like a better way to see if the concept will work than a bunch of us (verbally) fumbling around. What about combining 1, 2, 5 a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00131.html (10,149 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] A New Perspective [was:WRTC Spot/Log Correlation] (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 10:38:05 -0400 (EDT); I think one of Ev's intentions is to make it easier for us disadvantaged hams to define that smaller hill so we can see how far up we are. 73 - Ken _______________________________________________ CQ-; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00105.html (10,710 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] A New Perspective [was:WRTC Spot/Log Correlation] (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 08:59:56 -0400 (EDT); I need a degree in math to win constests? I always thought I did poorly because I slept too much on the weekend! 8-) 73 - Ken _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list C; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00092.html (10,427 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] A New Perspective [was:WRTC Spot/Log Correlation] (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 08:54:47 -0400 (EDT); That's why this idea is such a non-starter, Ev. Categorizing is the first thing you have to do to extract any meaning at all from the contest results. Call it filtering if you want, it's the same thi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00091.html (12,008 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] A New Perspective [was:WRTC Spot/Log Correlation] (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 18:23:51 -0400 (EDT); Let me see if I understand this. We all operate CQWW SSB (for example) and submit our results. Along with those results we send in a station profile...mine might say: - Single op (oops...nothing revo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00069.html (11,550 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]