Mail Archive Search: <+from:k0dq@analog.org>

Results:

References: [ +from:k0dq@analog.org: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Trlog] Help with PCMCIA in DOS (score: 1): Author: "K0DQ" <k0dq@analog.org>; Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 15:28:09 -0400; Gents. Posting this here on Tree's recommendation.. "Tree, I realize you probably get a million unsolicited questions from folks who think a onetime purchase of TRLog equates to a lifetime consultanc; /archives//html/TRLog/2008-09/msg00000.html (7,874 bytes)
2. Re: [Trlog] Help with PCMCIA in DOS (score: 1): Author: "K0DQ" <k0dq@analog.org>; Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 11:49:57 -0400; Thanks, Timo. In this case, no. All the BIOS are the same (and latest) - but some computers work, some don't. Thanks to Bernie, ZS4TX, and Ron, KK1L, think we've narrowed it to the socket/card driver; /archives//html/TRLog/2008-09/msg00003.html (10,605 bytes)
3. [Trlog] TR4W (score: 1): Author: "k0dq" <k0dq@analog.org>; Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 22:04:39 -0400; Trying to figure out how best to make the transition to Windows based contest logging program for SO2R. Preferred option is TR4W, which I have working on machines with an LPT. I do have a PIEXX SO2Rx; /archives//html/TRLog/2010-06/msg00002.html (6,391 bytes)
4. Re: [Trlog] TR4W (score: 1): Author: "k0dq" <k0dq@analog.org>; Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:04:22 -0400; Tod, Thanks. All that makes sense and am doing that with my older computers (desktops and laptops) that have 'real' Parallel / LPT ports. Haven't used it in a 48 hour contest yet, but all works well; /archives//html/TRLog/2010-06/msg00005.html (11,822 bytes)
5. Re: [Trlog] TR4W (score: 1): Author: "k0dq" <k0dq@analog.org>; Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:55:40 -0400; Thanks, Bob. Very helpful post. And all the best at WRTC. To summarize, I think there are three major tasks involved with implementing SO2R under TR4W when computers with only USB ports are available; /archives//html/TRLog/2010-06/msg00012.html (20,331 bytes)
6. Re: [Trlog] TR4W (score: 1): Author: "k0dq" <k0dq@analog.org>; Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:39:13 -0400; Thanks, Bob. Good clarification. Only possible concern is I'm not sure the CAT function would continue to work on the older rigs if the RTS/DTR aren't connected to the CAT connection. I lose connecti; /archives//html/TRLog/2010-06/msg00015.html (25,450 bytes)
7. Re: [Trlog] TR4W (score: 1): Author: "k0dq" <k0dq@analog.org>; Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:10:50 -0400; Trying again with fewer addees - --Original Message-- From: k0dq [mailto:k0dq@analog.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 4:25 PM To: 'VE5ZX'; 'Tod -MN'; 'trlog@contesting.com' Cc: Mark Bailey KD4D (kd4; /archives//html/TRLog/2010-06/msg00016.html (9,761 bytes)
8. Re: [Trlog] TR4W (score: 1): Author: "k0dq" <k0dq@analog.org>; Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:55:02 -0400; As with Windows, I'm still learning this reflector rules stuff. Below was rejected for too many addressees but went directly to a few. For the record: -- I *think* you can delete the "virtually" from; /archives//html/TRLog/2010-06/msg00017.html (10,309 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]