Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k0xu@iowadsl.net: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:12:06 -0500
(When did this tread get reactivated anyway) Actually I have sent them support for running it just the way that they do. I found it truly simple to set up and run. And I find the level of security to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00398.html (10,876 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:09:20 -0500
Wait a minute. You are telling us you have a US call & can register with it. Then telling us you won't register till you can register like a US licensee. You are kind of contradicting yourself there,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00539.html (9,817 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:12:06 -0500
(When did this tread get reactivated anyway) Actually I have sent them support for running it just the way that they do. I found it truly simple to set up and run. And I find the level of security to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00987.html (10,876 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:09:20 -0500
Wait a minute. You are telling us you have a US call & can register with it. Then telling us you won't register till you can register like a US licensee. You are kind of contradicting yourself there,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01128.html (9,817 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW DXCC (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:53:26 -0500
And the DX desk or contest sponsor should also take a person's word when they say they were operating in North Korea, or Bhutan, or any other hard to get to spot. Surely no one would ever cheat at so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00317.html (11,002 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW DXCC (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:45:22 -0500
Here is another place that we disagree. Operators that claim to be somewhere or someone that they are not are cheating all of us. Why wait till later (after they have a trunkfull of green stamps) to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00329.html (14,670 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW DXCC (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 21:49:47 -0500
Why do so many people say that? Seemed very straight forward to me. Zip, zap, zoop and you are on. Then I forgot to renew my certificates. No problem, bop back on & get them redone. Couple of minutes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00335.html (9,829 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Yanks in domestic contests: Please learn a bit about your neighbours (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 16:45:55 -0600
I always just try to log it as sent. However, if what I am sent is not correct, you can't blame me. I have been sent all of the variants in different contests. But since these guys are presumably Can
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00288.html (10,496 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dealing with eBay (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 17:52:01 -0600
I notice that they are all being sold by the same party. And he really can't spell. At 08:52 AM 2/4/04, Mike Gilmer - N2MG wrote: In case there was any doubt, I reported all 3 devices through eBay's
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00098.html (11,947 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW - Needs More Participation (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 10:26:14 -0500
I upload my logs to eQSL, but I don't really use it myself. I have very little trust in a system that has so little security. I have been using LOTW since the beta test and think it is a much better,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00189.html (10,073 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW - Needs More Participation (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 00:14:44 -0500
I just set up a couple of certificates from them for the current call & the last call. Exported them from DX4WIN with the appropriate date filters then processed the logs & uploaded them with the cor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00201.html (11,382 bytes)

12. Re[6]: [CQ-Contest] LotW - Needs More Participation (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 01:20:06 -0500
I am sure the resistance does not stem from the fact that LOTW might cause a decrease in the flow of green stamps to some operators. But it could sure look like that to some of us. At 08:56 PM 5/21/0
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00246.html (12,120 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Desk design (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:49:37 -0500
I am always interested in these threads as they tend to help me not repeat someone else's mistakes. One thing I know for sure: I will be able to walk BEHIND my next desk so that I can better manage a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-08/msg00123.html (8,811 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Don't we need to change the sprint protocol? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 13:54:58 -0500
Just listen to his next qso to get the missing info. Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Big Bear Lake, CA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00122.html (10,070 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] RE: Contesting from the basement (score: 1)
Author: k0xu@iowadsl.net (Jim Rhodes)
Date: Fri Jul 25 15:58:44 2003
Seems like there are a lot of people going with the Anderson Power Pole plugs. Polarized, self wiping, plenty heavy. The Rig-Runner & other devices can give multiple outlets in small space. Jim Rhode
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00297.html (8,283 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] If You Don't QSL, LISTEN UP! (score: 1)
Author: k0xu@iowadsl.net (Jim Rhodes)
Date: Fri Aug 8 09:20:36 2003
I too have had less than acceptable service from the 0 bureau since they moved it to Kansas City. Sometimes more than a year between envelopes. The money I send seems to be used up much quicker than
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00173.html (9,639 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] Signing/verifying QSLs (score: 1)
Author: k0xu@iowadsl.net (Jim Rhodes)
Date: Sun Aug 10 19:42:33 2003
Ken, if I had worked you I would be glad to get such a card. Remind me to never send a card Bruce. Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rhodesend.net
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00199.html (9,974 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] unique contacts and logging errors (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 17:27:02 -0500
In this situation wouldn't the polite thing to do be sending in a check log? I have done this in the past. At 09:21 AM 9/11/03, Zack Widup wrote: Last year I started into a contest (I forget which on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00129.html (11,210 bytes)

19. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:26:46 -0500
Sounds to me that you have decided that you aren't going to like it no matter what. You even criticize them for going out of their way in trying to help people out. Thanks for letting us know your op
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00331.html (16,222 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Fee Schedule just released !!! (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:45:15 -0500
Personally just not having to send my precious cards through the mail to them would be worth the fee. $20.00 for DXCC or $11.25 for WAS. I have always taken my cards to a hamfest or somewhere where t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00332.html (12,374 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu