- 1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cabrillo for CQWW CW: How Credit Multiple Clubs? (score: 1)
- Author: David Hoaglin <k1ht58@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 22:28:23 -0500
- As I understand it, the procedure has changed a bit from last year. I'm not sure that the FAQ is in step with the software. The log-checking software is now supposed to accept more than one CLUB line
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00000.html (8,487 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] The continuing lesson - log what is sent.... (score: 1)
- Author: David Hoaglin <k1ht58@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:47:59 -0500
- For training purposes, it's too bad that we no longer have the "Internet Sprint," a CW contest that flourished briefly some years ago. One difference from the North American Sprint was the name in yo
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-01/msg00045.html (10,178 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Acking Sprint QSO's (score: 1)
- Author: David Hoaglin <k1ht58@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 09:04:29 -0500
- The order in which a station sends the parts of the exchange is not a problem. It's a matter of good practice. I see no need to formalize the "unwritten rule." After Julie W1DL (SK) introduced me to
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00084.html (10,047 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu