Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k1mk@alum.mit.edu: 63 ]

Total 63 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding Standards (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:12:25 -0400
Some of the changes in grounding standards that have been mentioned (10 ft. ground rods vs. 8 ft,; 2/0 AWG copper ground leads vs. 6 tinned copper, etc.) are from the latest revision of the tower spe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01078.html (9,898 bytes)

42. Re: [TowerTalk] HAM RADIO magazine;on PDF, or other? /Sell MS Tooling (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:24:42 -0400
ARRL sells Ham Radio Magazine on CD-ROM <http://www.arrl.org/catalog/?category=CD-ROMs#HRCD> Michael Keane K1MK k1mk@alum.mit.edu _______________________________________________ _____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00747.html (7,958 bytes)

43. Re: [TowerTalk] permit in hand (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:05:26 -0400
Bill, Rights? Rights! We got no stinkin' rights! Seriously, if PRB-1 did actually confer "rights," then it would be a much better situation for us hams. Because then, someone might be successful in r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00851.html (9,903 bytes)

44. Re: [TowerTalk] Takeoff Angles and Non-Reciprocal Propagation (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 12:52:37 -0400
The assumption that an individual ray will follow a different path when moving left-to-right than right-to-left is what shouldn't make sense. As you shoot individual rays outward from the antenna and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00068.html (12,057 bytes)

45. Re: [TowerTalk] Takeoff Angles and Non-Reciprocal Propagation (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 13:56:58 -0400
Ahhh, there's a conceptual issue. In terms of geometric optics and ray tracing, a ray is assumed to be infinitely thin That's a ray bundle or a wave. That's physical (or wave) optics. HFTA is based u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00074.html (12,574 bytes)

46. Re: [TowerTalk] takeoff angles and reciprocity (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 14:02:43 -0400
Because there was a sporadic-E opening over SW Europe which was sufficiently intense and widespread to link up with the F2 opening to NW Africa One of those less than typical occurences that often go
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00075.html (7,706 bytes)

47. Re: [TowerTalk] Takeoff Angles and Non-Reciprocal Propagation (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 15:39:08 -0400
YUp, it sure is valid. :-) Physical (wave) formalism is completely accurate everywhere but tends to be computationally very tedious when thew wavelength is small compared to the physical scale of the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00083.html (12,491 bytes)

48. Re: [TowerTalk] DIN Connectors You Can't Solder To (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:50:37 -0500
Yaseu and Kenwood use the DIN-8/262 for the Band Data connector 73, Mike K1MK Michael Keane K1MK k1mk@alum.mit.edu _______________________________________________ ____________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00425.html (10,410 bytes)

49. Re: [TowerTalk] RTV? What Kind? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 10:01:46 -0500
You definitely want to use a non-corrosive type of RTV. The general purpose RTV you'll find at the local hardware store is most likely to be an acetoxy cure RTV which releases acetic acid as a by-pro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00049.html (8,434 bytes)

50. Re: [TowerTalk] RTV? What Kind? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:25:00 -0500
That's correct. A two-part RTV is needed for use in enclosed spaces or when used as a molding or potting compound. Because the curing proceeds from the outside in, the cure time for a one-part RTV se
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00054.html (9,176 bytes)

51. Re: [TowerTalk] worlds biggest yagi (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:29:24 -0400
Yes, it was Karl Jansky (discover of radio noise from the cosmos), although Jansky's array rotated on tires from a Ford Model-T in a wooden track. It was comparatively lightweight consisting mostly o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00515.html (8,871 bytes)

52. Re: [TowerTalk] tower restrictions (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:34:11 -0400
North Brandford was never a 70 mph wind zone under the earlier "fastest mile of wind" measure for basic wind speed (EIA/TIA-222-E; ASCE 7-88); North Branford was a 85 mph fastest mile of wind zone. P
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00506.html (10,022 bytes)

53. Re: [TowerTalk] Some spectacular views of the abandoned Russian Woodpecker antenna array (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:27:53 -0500
The station whose operators glow in the dark :-) Note the location and why this woodpecker site went QRT ;-) 73, Mike K1MK _______________________________________________ ____________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00492.html (7,593 bytes)

54. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:09:45 -0400
Not really. Mechanically the configuration represents a 50% increase in wind area (and an significant increase in weight) over simply tilting a conventional yagi design at 45 degrees to the horizonta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00275.html (9,261 bytes)

55. [TowerTalk] Polarization and ionospheric propagation (was Re: Gizmotchy's) (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:39:44 -0400
No, virtually never circularly polarized. The general case for a 100% linearly polarized wave that propagates through the ionosphere (a magnetized plasma) is for the wave to be converted into an elli
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00322.html (11,557 bytes)

56. Re: [TowerTalk] Polarization change Was ( Gizmotchy's) (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:44:29 -0400
It's not that the ionosphere preferentially converts a vertically polarized wave into a primarily horizontally polarized wave. In general the ionosphere doesn't do anything like that. It's that the i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00326.html (11,263 bytes)

57. Re: [TowerTalk] polarization change (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:58:46 -0400
I can't recall ever having seen this bit of folklore written down anywhere. Does anyone know a source? Just my curiosity. FWIW, the phenomenon of "skywave" fading was first studied by Bell Labs, RCA,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00362.html (8,978 bytes)

58. Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole revisited. (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 09:35:07 -0400
Increasing the current while maintaining the distribution of current along the antenna does not produce "gain" provided that the applied power is held constant. Directive gain can be realized only if
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00365.html (9,842 bytes)

59. Re: [TowerTalk] polarization change (QSP for N2EA) (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 09:41:02 -0400
I can't post from where I'm at... up in VT. Pse re-post this for me? First, you're right about the Bell Labs work of the 30's. I read the original papers, in proceedings of the IRE, in the engineerin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00368.html (10,032 bytes)

60. Re: [TowerTalk] Tic rotor potmeter replacement? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:54:18 -0400
According to its spec sheet, a 3590S-1-501 is unsealed against water (IP40). A 3590S-3-501 (plastic bushing) or 3590S-4-501 (metal bushing) variants are sealed against a water jet from any angle (IP6
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00438.html (10,478 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu