Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k1mk@arrl.net: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] OO reports (score: 1)
Author: k1mk@arrl.net (Michael Keane, K1MK)
Date: Mon Mar 11 08:32:39 2002
Of course our behavior as a group is highly predictable, otherwise a variant of this discussion wouldn't recur each year... Every time the topic does comes up, one thing that strikes me is the degree
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00193.html (9,137 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX SSB on Easter Weekend ? (score: 1)
Author: k1mk@arrl.net (Michael Keane, K1MK)
Date: Sun Mar 17 22:10:38 2002
But there are plenty of locales, where as a vestigial artifact of colonialism the four day weekend is still a secular holiday even though it may not have any particular significance to a majority of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00327.html (12,407 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] vhf qso party (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:19:56 -0400
Limited Multioperator: a maximum of four bands used. (Logs from additional bands used, if any, should be included as checklogs.) From General Rules for ARRL Contests on Bands Above 50 MHz - http://ww
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00136.html (8,376 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating time calculation (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:40:43 -0500
The contest period is specified as beginning 2100 UTC Saturday, and ending 0300 UTC Monday. Does that mean the contest period is 30 hours long like the rules say or is it be 30 hours and 1 minute lon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00250.html (8,130 bytes)

5. RE: [CQ-Contest] Feb 04 QST op-ed article (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Keane, K1MK" <k1mk@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 21:27:00 -0500
At 01:55 PM 1/18/04, W. Wright, W5XD wrote: Emergency and public service communications seem to be the thread of the article. That what it purports to be. I have a slightly different take on it. Thin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00298.html (11,568 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] eQSL change of policy (score: 1)
Author: k1mk@arrl.net (Michael Keane, K1MK)
Date: Fri Apr 5 12:22:49 2002
Jim, requirements for up by the program. It That rigor would appear to already be there, at least in public statements if not enforcement. The DXCC Program has characterized preemptive QSLing even wi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00064.html (14,981 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] ARRL report on line scores decision (score: 1)
Author: k1mk@arrl.net (Michael Keane, K1MK)
Date: Tue Jul 23 09:51:48 2002
There'd be a price difference because... ? Michael Keane K1MK k1mk@arrl.net ________________________________________________ PeoplePC: It's for people. And it's just smart. http://www.peoplepc.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00332.html (9,350 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] making lemonade (was: ARRL report on line scores decision) (score: 1)
Author: k1mk@arrl.net (Michael Keane, K1MK)
Date: Fri Jul 26 09:18:52 2002
I think you're right Pete, the big improvement in what Trey is proposing comes from challenging the log checkers (and maybe even the article writers) to turn things around ASAP rather than working to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00453.html (7,324 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] making lemonade (was: ARRL report on line scores decision) (score: 1)
Author: k1mk@arrl.net (Michael Keane, K1MK)
Date: Fri Jul 26 10:31:19 2002
It's unclear to which date that 45 day lead time is measured relative. The ad deadline for QST is something like 45 days prior to the date of issue so it makes sense if that was the editorial deadlin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00457.html (9,323 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] making lemonade (score: 1)
Author: k1mk@arrl.net (Michael Keane, K1MK)
Date: Fri Jul 26 23:41:57 2002
Nine months ago one could have made the suggestion that the final SS scores be prepared and ready to go onto the Web site in mid-January rather than waiting until mid-April when the results article w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00479.html (7,318 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] Out of Band operating (score: 1)
Author: k1mk@arrl.net (Michael Keane, K1MK)
Date: Thu Oct 31 11:24:03 2002
Well, I don't see what would be wrong with 21000.5 As long as you're keying waveform is reasonable and you're not sending faster than 100 wpm. ;-) No, that's not stated emphatically by anyone. In pra
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00299.html (8,713 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] An Innocent Question about Grid-4's/Grid-Fields andHF (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 08:56:04 -0400
Contests do not quickly or radically depart from their initial conception. Significant format and content changes are not unknown, but they are rare. Historically, organizations sponsoring contests a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00336.html (8,677 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu